Yes, it could be a typo

…but we still have to report it.
new nikon 85mm lens small Yes, it could be a typo
What do we have here? A new Nikon 85mm lens? Could be. Why is it listed as NEW? Typo?
Pro and cons:
  • We know already that Ritz is low/out of stock on primes (including the 85mm).
  • SB-900 flash and the 60mm Macro lens are also listed as NEW, so we know this is not an out-of-date ad.
  • It still listed as AF and not as AF-S. One would expect the new 85mm to be AF-S.
  • The price seems to be the same as the old AF lens.
Thank you JJ.
As always, the full-size scan can be found @ http://www.flickr.com/photos/nikonrumors/

Related posts:

  1. Nikon D30 or a typo?
  2. Thom Hogan: Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.4G VR “coming very, very soon now”
  3. Nikkor AF-S 85/1.4G ED
  4. Foto Magazin scan – Nikon Photokina rumor from Germany
  5. Busted!

This entry was posted in Nikon Lenses. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

15 Comments

  1. davidthenikonuser
    Posted August 18, 2008 at 3:21 am | Permalink

    must be a typo. New lenses would be AF-S and G lenses.

  2. Adam
    Posted August 18, 2008 at 3:41 am | Permalink

    It could be that it’s a an AF-S lens with an aperture ring, like the AF-S 17-35 f/2.8 lens. This would allow backwards compatibility with older cameras if they plan on completely discontinuing the non AF-S primes they currently have in production.

  3. Posted August 18, 2008 at 6:07 am | Permalink

    Nikon would be committing suicide by releasing more AF-D primes. They have been trying to sell AF-D incompatible bodies for about 2 years now, and they have yet to release even ONE f/1.x lens with AF-S. UN-ACCEPTABLE.

    Of course I’m confident that the upcoming (and they ARE coming) primes will indeed be AF-S G, and hopefully the pro versions will be ED / N etc…

    =Matt=

  4. matt
    Posted August 18, 2008 at 8:23 am | Permalink

    the question is, which word is the typo?
    the “new” ?? or the “AF” ??
    both could be ;)

  5. christian
    Posted August 18, 2008 at 8:40 am | Permalink

    I think the two “new” are from the version before and they maybe belong to the pc-e 85 and the af-s 60, which maybe were new in the last list.

  6. florian
    Posted August 18, 2008 at 9:41 am | Permalink

    Or it is just “new” on stock.

  7. Anonymous
    Posted August 18, 2008 at 10:05 am | Permalink

    Ya that’s a “new” sb-900 too. Thats about a year old now :)

  8. M
    Posted August 18, 2008 at 12:58 pm | Permalink

    Er, nope. The SB-900 was announced last July together with the D700, so it’s still quite new :)

  9. Blog Admin
    Posted August 18, 2008 at 1:12 pm | Permalink

    SB-900 – 1 year old? You mean 1 1/2 months old – introduced on July 1st, 2008. Check!

  10. Anonymous
    Posted August 18, 2008 at 5:27 pm | Permalink

    AF-D and AF-S are not mutually exclusive, you know… as the 300/4 AF-S, 17-35/2.8 AF-S and 28-70/2.8 AF-S show. I agree that it’s likely a typo, though…

  11. davidthenikonuser
    Posted August 18, 2008 at 6:11 pm | Permalink

    In the past couple of years all new lenses have been G type. The last lens to have an aperture ring was the 50mm f/1.8D in 2002. So I really don’t think Nikon is going to start putting the aperture ring back on. If people want a lens to use on the old manual cameras then they can by the old used lenses for them.

    I beet in a couple more years after Nikon updates all there primes to AF-S they will no longer put in-camera focus motors in any of there DSLR’s.

  12. Jason
    Posted August 28, 2008 at 8:21 am | Permalink

    The shops and re-sellers often get information about new products before the rest of us – remember Digital Depot and the D-700? I thought it’s probably a typo, but there’s just a chance that they’ve put next month’s “NEW!” tags on this month’s price list. And it all adds to the fun, of course
    - JJ

  13. Posted September 6, 2008 at 4:23 pm | Permalink

    fzsmnimw

    fzsmnimw

  14. Posted September 6, 2008 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    fzsmnimw

    fzsmnimw

  15. Posted September 6, 2008 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    [URL=http://oiwurqjy.comtqkjnbks/URL] vzcrjkpm“>http://qtwrmwdi.com“>vzcrjkpm tvbrlvya http://odcjadrx.com xwavvssm kxywmtvt