More on the Nikon D400 rumor

This is Ken Rockwell’s take on the Nikon D400.

The rumor is that D400, D3x and new lenses will be released for the European Soccer Championship (starts on June 7, 2008). I still think any announcement will on for the Olympics.
*** The link about the specs have been removed after a reader’s request. It seems that the data was completely bogus, generated by a well known in the photography community “psycho”. We have been asked before to remove posts from the same person. This site deals with rumors but we still respect such requests. Sorry for the inconvenience.***
I really have a problem with the name “D400″ - Canon already had a model Canon EOS 400D.
Some web site in Europe already is selling battery for the D400. Typo? Probably.
The D400 cannot be a real rumor without a picture:
I am not going to comment on the authenticity of the pictures - I am sure you will.

This entry was posted in D3x, D400. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

21 Comments

  1. Posted May 31, 2008 at 11:33 am | Permalink

    That seems very nice. However, the pictures look a lot like the D300 with some post-processing magic applied around the model number. One has to wonder where the big pentaprism is …

    [Reply]

  2. Posted May 31, 2008 at 4:57 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think either company cares about confusing comsumers.

    Canon: 300D, 40D & D60
    Nikon: D300, D40 & D60

    [Reply]

  3. Marc
    Posted May 31, 2008 at 8:58 pm | Permalink

    The EN-EL9 battery is for the D40, so I’m sure it’s a typo.

    [Reply]

  4. Posted June 1, 2008 at 3:40 am | Permalink

    Thx for the visit to my site … best wishes from me to your effort on your new site. Bravo!!

    [Reply]

  5. Blog Admin
    Posted June 1, 2008 at 11:56 pm | Permalink

    Yes, that’s probably the case but such leaks from web sites are very useful to track upcoming products.

    [Reply]

  6. Posted June 2, 2008 at 1:16 am | Permalink

    If it’s an FX camera, why is it shown with a Nikkor 18-200 DX lens.

    I call bullshit!

    [Reply]

  7. Blog Admin
    Posted June 2, 2008 at 1:17 am | Permalink

    Freedom of speech - you call it whatever you want!

    [Reply]

  8. Blog Admin
    Posted June 2, 2008 at 1:19 am | Permalink

    Maybe this is a marketing trick to get you interested in the competition.

    [Reply]

  9. Josh Geyer
    Posted June 4, 2008 at 8:58 pm | Permalink

    Sorry, I meant no disrespect to the site.. Just pointed out an obvious flaw in the mock up :D

    Great website by the way. I check every couple days.

    [Reply]

  10. Blog Admin
    Posted June 4, 2008 at 10:26 pm | Permalink

    No, my comment was for the “bullshit” comment after yours. You did not disrespect the site in any way, even the comment after yours did not. This what people think, and I respect that - otherwise I would have removed their comments already

    I am glad you like the site and this is all I care about.

    [Reply]

  11. Yo!
    Posted June 5, 2008 at 6:26 am | Permalink

    As with the D3, you can set it to 1.5 factor to enable you to use your old dx lenses.

    [Reply]

  12. Blog Admin
    Posted June 6, 2008 at 12:50 am | Permalink

    I do like DX lenses - you can get them today for less than 1/2 of the price and weight of a FX lens. Yes, they are not future proof, but by the time full frame become mainstream, the price of FX lenses will be half of what is today - so over time you can get 2 lenses for the price of a FX lens today.

    [Reply]

  13. Nikhil
    Posted June 11, 2008 at 8:23 am | Permalink

    Dear All,

    Theres a huge market waiting for a low cost affordable Nikon Full Frame. Whether its called D10 or D400 doesnt matter. What matters is Nikon should not delay their launch of such a low cost camers and give a upper hand to Canon.

    People are waiting to gobble up a low cost Full Frame. HOPE NIKONS LISTENING?.
    Regards.
    Nikhil

    [Reply]

  14. Artur Kozlowski
    Posted June 12, 2008 at 7:08 am | Permalink

    Also, the viewfinder is too small for FX (full frame) sensor. Cheap job, at least the D10 fakery is consistent.

    [Reply]

  15. Adrian
    Posted June 15, 2008 at 3:40 pm | Permalink

    Euro soccer has nearly finished and no Nikon announcement. Just a heads up for non-Europeans.

    [Reply]

  16. Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:21 pm | Permalink

    Cheap comment message preview tramadol.

    Tramadol dog. Tramadol. What is the street value for tramadol.

    [Reply]

  17. mayur
    Posted July 8, 2008 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

    Nikhil is right–see now canon will go for a low cost full frame–I wish please add GPSsystem in Nikon D400 .Should nikon change from Nikon D300 to Nikon 300F–F will mean full frame–To read FX is little bitter–i think thatnikon should change nikon 400F as full frame future model.

    [Reply]

  18. Posted August 8, 2008 at 1:29 am | Permalink

    tjbtxqdn

    tjbtxqdn

    [Reply]

  19. Posted August 8, 2008 at 1:31 am | Permalink

    tjbtxqdn

    tjbtxqdn

    [Reply]

  20. Posted August 8, 2008 at 1:41 am | Permalink

    pzpxnwnl http://vwuohhzy.com urpdqsxq ensvcahg nmmhnuhr“>http://ubuxtdnp.com“>nmmhnuhr [URL=http://enjsqiwh.comeybnhgzf/URL]

    [Reply]

  21. frank
    Posted August 13, 2008 at 2:32 pm | Permalink

    I won’t buy a digital SLR until Nikon brings out a full-frame DSLR that can take all non-digital-sized AF and manual lenses.

    People’s creativity is being stifled and they are forced to pay out extra for new lenses when the old Nikon and Nikkor lenses were renowned as some of the best.

    Does anyone know whether there is a strap-on CCD for 35 mm cameras that really works? If not someone should invent one.

    [Reply]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.