
| SPECIFICATIONS | |
| Model Name | G005 |
| Focal Length | 60mm |
| Maximum Aperture | F/2.0 |
| Angle of View (diagonal) | 26 degrees and 35 minutes (APS-C size equivalent) |
| Optical Construction | 14 elements in 10 groups |
| Minimum Focusing Distance | 0.23m (9.1in.) |
| Max. Magnification Ratio | 1 : 1 |
| Minimum Working Distance | 100mm (3.94in.) |
| Filter Diameter | 55mm |
| Overall Length | 80mm (3.15in.)* |
| Maximum Diameter | 73mm (2.9in.) |
| Weight | 400g (14.1oz.)* |
| Diaphragm Blade Number | 7 |
| Minimum Aperture | F/22 |
| Standard Accessory | Lens Hood |
| Compatible Mount | For Canon, Nikon (with built-in AF motor) and Sony |
Related posts:
- New lens coming out soon: Voigtlander Color Skopar 20mm F3.5 SL II Aspherical (for Nikon Ai-s)
- New ultra high power zoom: Tamron AF18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC LD Aspherical (IF) MACRO
- Tamron SP AF17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di-II VC LD Aspherical IF (Nikon mount)
- New Tokina AT-X 16.5-135mm DX Wide-Range Lens
- I say those are samples from the new Nikkor 16-35mm f/4 VR lens








25 Comments
I want to go to there.
one day too late.
nooo, more like 8 hours late
Why does it say 35 minutes on APS sensor?
Because the field of view is 26 degrees 35 minutes. There are 60 minutes to a degree. 360 degrees is a full circle. This is a minute of arc, not a minute of time.
Oohh!.. make sense. thanks
hi D800, when are you coming?
you are LATE !
I’d buy that for a dollar!
But not much more
wow.. it even comes with its own food.. yipee, no need to buy food for this lens…
I wish my lenses came with Lens Food as standard, that’s normally a pricey aftermarket accessory.
lol – I copied that from the original Tamron site…
… and people sometimes complain that I make mistakes
I corrected it
I never buy Lens Food. The lens will just get fat and lazy, which makes them heavier, harder to fit into camera bags, and may shorten their lifespan. I want my lenses lean and hungry.
never knew that lens needs to eat as well. The typo’s still there NR
Nice. I’ll wait for the test results, but I can see buying this down the road.
+1 If it can focus quickly, loca isn’t horrible and it’s as sharp as Tamron’s other macro glass. I’m guessing about US$450.
I hope Tamron releases a 24-70 or 24-75 f2.8 with VC (or whatever they call the stabilizing system), built-in AF motor, and weather sealing.
That would be a great choice to compete with Nikon and Canon Zooms (much more expensive)
I agree! But it seems that neither Sigma nor Tamron are able to put their versions of VR in their 2.8 lines. Why not in their 70-200 2.8s?
I read a rumor Tamron is working on a new 24-75mm f/2.8 VC and updating the 70-200mm with VC. here, http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/anything-coming-from-tamron-cr2/
so basically, useless on my D700
If you’d like to swap your D700 for my D90 it’ll be ok…..
You already have the option of the Tamron 90mm FF macro lens, which is well respected. This new lens adds a DX alternative with a similar field of view.
Gee, is it possible for any manufacturer to introduce a DX lens without the FX crowd bursting into tears?
So ugly, like any other pirate manufacturer lens.
Great news. I’m anxious to see some video podcast reviews of this lens in action by professional photographers.