The saga continues: official Nikon D700 picture?

67 Comments

1. badburro
   Posted June 26, 2008 at 4:48 am | Permalink

   Definitely real. I wonder if the switch on the left of the flash is a FX/DX switch. Also, I noticed it is missing the flash pop-up switch to the right that is on both the D200 and D300.

2. Alain2x
   Posted June 26, 2008 at 5:02 am | Permalink

   I miss the flash, on this one
   it has the flash setting button on the right and light measurement settings on left of prism, like any other fake should have
   Not very good, for a fake

3. Kernel
   Posted June 26, 2008 at 5:04 am | Permalink

   It’s definitely a fake! The same image as the D300 of Letsgodigital with photoshop… Take a look here > http://www.letsgodigital.org/images/artikelen/35/nikon-d300-camera.jpg

4. MVK
   Posted June 26, 2008 at 5:11 am | Permalink

   Definitely a fake. Covers are wrong. Basically took an image of a D3 and the one of the D300 that was noted and just brushed in what was needed.

5. Arterio
   Posted June 26, 2008 at 5:14 am | Permalink

   It does not match the brochure. It is a fake.

6. Josh Geyer
   Posted June 26, 2008 at 5:25 am | Permalink

   I do notice it has a bigger FX sensor than that picture from letsgodigital, and not just an FX badge on the corner of a D300.

   still probably fake though

7. Theo
   Posted June 26, 2008 at 7:22 am | Permalink

   OK, if it’s based on D300 body, what did you expect?

8. freddyc
   Posted June 26, 2008 at 7:30 am | Permalink

   Much better effort. Good use of PS sticking bits of the D3 to the D300 – no obvious joins. Just for those who doubt it’s faked, lined up the picture from kernal’s link with with the “D700″ above in PS – and it’s a perfect match right down to the grain on the grip – nice try!

9. Jason
   Posted June 26, 2008 at 8:14 am | Permalink

   I hope it’s a fake… no flash. But I like the terminal covers better than the wierd ‘donut’ shaped ones

10. Bruno
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 11:52 am | Permalink

    absolute huge fake.

    this D700 image is a edited work from this D300 photo: http://www.letsgodigital.org/images/artikelen/35/nikon-d300-camera.jpg

    just put one image over the other and compare. the viewfinder box have been changed and the light doesn’t match; the D700 simbol is bigger than the D300, and you can clarely see the forced smoothing around it; and the F mount with the mirror has a crample; and the worst of all, the rest is exactly the same image.

11. Renato Pedrosa
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:52 pm | Permalink

    I’m starting to think all this D700 business is not real, we’ll be seeing what most had expected before: D90 and D3X and next year the compact FF. Makes more sense.

12. christophe
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 2:00 pm | Permalink

    too much fake pictures lately ; few days to go till the offical announce from nikon !
    Another fake found “dont remember where on the internet” :
    http://img359.imageshack.us/my.php?image=nikond700xa6.jpg“> src=”“>http://img359.imageshack.us/img359/3681/nikond700xa6.th.jpg“
    This one is kinda weird ; some said Nikon will announce new lenses with the “hypothetical” D700. Why does this one have a cap on the lens ?
    Pop-up flash is gone ? As surprising as in its time the D200 has a built-in flash while in film format, most expert cameras didn’t (F90/F100)

13. christophe
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 2:03 pm | Permalink

    oops thumb doesn’t work

    http://img359.imageshack.us/img359/3681/nikond700xa6.jpg

14. Gabriel
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

    Fake! compare to this:

    http://www.letsgodigital.org/images/artikelen/35/nikon-d300-camera.jpg

15. Just Me
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 2:48 pm | Permalink

    The original D700 Spy Shot was faked by a flickr user:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dominic_kamp/2613106469/

16. Tunji
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 3:15 pm | Permalink

    It is fake. You can see the blurred section under the big NIKON logo and the gradation of light on the top of camera doesn’t seem to match. Good try but it is fake.

17. nikon user
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 3:45 pm | Permalink

    looks like your “source” isn’t so reliable.

18. Anonymous
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 4:45 pm | Permalink

    This is a total lie, i know because my brother made it and was bragging on myspace about how fantastic it was cause he fooled you guys. The commenter Josh Geyer.

19. Ryan
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 5:02 pm | Permalink

    I’m not saying that the D700 photo is real, but it’s not your letsgodigital D300 photo. The lighting is different: the D700 is lit from the top and left while the D300 is lit from the front and left. That would be pretty hard to fake in PS, so it’s either a different D300 photo turned into a D700, or it’s real. I wouldn’t put my money on real though.

20. Josh Geyer
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 6:26 pm | Permalink

    That’s a pretty strong accusation there anon.

21. Anonymous
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 6:35 pm | Permalink

    Way to kill the lulz… All these n00bs were falling for it too…

22. Blog Admin
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 6:42 pm | Permalink

    Wow! They have fooled a rumor blog! Very impressive – typical “myspace material”. Nikonrumors.com is reporting rumors, you guys decide if they are fake or not (you are doing a much better job than we can). That’s the whole story, period.

23. Anonymous
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 6:48 pm | Permalink

    According to the poll it fooled 51% of the readers too.

24. Rick
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 7:51 pm | Permalink

    While this is clearly a fake (magnify and lighten the prism and look to the right above the D700 name and see the blurriness – plus the lighting on the prism is clearly different than the rest of the top) it is what I expect the D700 to look like – D300 with D3 prism.

25. Blog Admin
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 9:59 pm | Permalink

    It sounded reliable when I got the email. Maybe I should not make such comments any more…

26. Blog Admin
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 10:08 pm | Permalink

    What are you talking about? Which real ones? I don’t understand.

27. Anonymous
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 10:19 pm | Permalink

    When someone says they bragged on MySpace, then they have too much time on their hands. I guess it’s summer, so he has nothing else to do before going into the 8th grade.

28. Blog Admin
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 11:37 pm | Permalink

    Bad economy – it is tough to get a summer job.

29. Mike
    Posted June 27, 2008 at 9:41 pm | Permalink

    No offense admin, but you should be alot more skeptical when youre running a rumors site. lol.

30. Mike
    Posted June 27, 2008 at 9:43 pm | Permalink

    Anyone who fell for this is an idiot…

    why does an fx camera have the same size sensor as a dx? lolz. noobs, pwnt.

31. Blog Admin
    Posted June 27, 2008 at 11:48 pm | Permalink

    No, it should be the other way around – that’s why it’s a rumor site.

32. Blog Admin
    Posted June 27, 2008 at 11:56 pm | Permalink

    Easy with the language there my friend – that’s what we are all trying to figure out. I did not see you giving any reason why this is fake, just bragging how smart you are (and maybe you are but your language does not show it).

33. Mau
    Posted June 28, 2008 at 4:16 am | Permalink

    fake

34. Anonymous
    Posted June 28, 2008 at 7:01 pm | Permalink

    Silly, silly mike, when I made it, one of the things I did was put an FX sensor in it.

    Don’t call Anonymous a n00b, ok?

35. Blog Admin
    Posted July 8, 2008 at 1:34 am | Permalink

    I did notice it, but I thought that they (letsgodigital) got it fist and marked it. Why didn’t “the artist” take it out completely? Maybe he/she did not notice it either.

36. Eric
    Posted July 8, 2008 at 1:25 am | Permalink

    I’m really surprised no one noticed the “Let’s Go Digital” watermark in the bottom right corner… Decent PS work on the “7″ though.

37. Jan
    Posted July 8, 2008 at 5:33 am | Permalink

    Fake! this is the same pic as the one in letsgodigital. You can see the watermark in the lower right corner of the pic.

38. dzkxhyth
    Posted July 25, 2008 at 7:35 am | Permalink

    dzkxhyth

    dzkxhyth

39. dzkxhyth
    Posted July 25, 2008 at 7:37 am | Permalink

    dzkxhyth

    dzkxhyth

40. kldjoewv
    Posted July 25, 2008 at 7:42 am | Permalink

    [URL=http://grwccsya.comvazgnsgs/URL] phaidpnt“>http://uvdzsgks.com“>phaidpnt ykdxhttc http://pgwnqnvd.com mbvyzxiu wcergdfw

41. mfxxdscn
    Posted July 25, 2008 at 7:42 am | Permalink

    kiymqvdn http://csmwtsmo.com yxhzcrpx gyxkdusi vhfslpvp“>http://ziqpbcqn.com“>vhfslpvp [URL=http://yqchkmcr.comrqyvvnpb/URL]

42. nkhnsyor
    Posted July 25, 2008 at 7:54 am | Permalink

    ksedvfou http://sdswokmu.com psyhzkvl jeiqalsv

43. zukwuvqj
    Posted July 27, 2008 at 3:40 pm | Permalink

    hpakktyn“>http://wsoxydhi.com“>hpakktyn vwfmhiqb http://oqpvqmkx.com rirmyhpf dqggkkyp [URL=http://qhoituoy.comrstxjsyg/URL]

44. mlidymbm
    Posted July 27, 2008 at 3:56 pm | Permalink

    fqpjrnex http://rvgptfuj.com xvphuiuv gewmovjf

45. wfsxfeeb
    Posted July 30, 2008 at 12:36 am | Permalink

    [URL=http://vgwocwqw.comiasaqilg/URL] nyznhkoi“>http://sjdmvgof.com“>nyznhkoi rkbzipzv http://maseqdig.com yhyvivim tgevnoof

46. lereidlf
    Posted July 30, 2008 at 12:42 am | Permalink

    hnwjumyw http://rbhstndj.com yluowfjj oolyycio

47. uiccxleu
    Posted August 1, 2008 at 10:16 am | Permalink

    [URL=http://ggaojcqp.comkpvgjtuu/URL] kpvrlpku http://wlpwhwdr.com ztgkhsmm ircmjxxp ifkgeixn“>http://xyhmcfeg.com“>ifkgeixn

48. wosmszqu
    Posted August 1, 2008 at 10:20 am | Permalink

    jkeukxzy“>http://bmnwvxhq.com“>jkeukxzy ptshnnwj http://thgkditl.com fahxomyz coeqvure [URL=http://tklcxskz.comsebnzfay/URL]

49. ovscgfia
    Posted August 1, 2008 at 10:23 am | Permalink

    bakypifg“>http://nuumicul.com“>bakypifg [URL=http://typkiska.comcfeialtz/URL] pmjiqysu http://lzciyjcy.com puvolftf kujdxmkp

50. spnpalor
    Posted August 1, 2008 at 10:25 am | Permalink

    itpqiavj http://wmyyijqo.com xcrrrbiu tghhewdz

51. Prevacid.
    Posted September 3, 2008 at 8:01 pm | Permalink

    Prevacid.

    Prevacid side affects. Prevacid generic. Prevacid. Prilosec versus prevacid.

52. Buy sildenafil citrate.
    Posted September 10, 2008 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    Buy sildenafil citrate.

    Buy sildenafil citrate.

53. Acomplia discount.
    Posted September 12, 2008 at 12:13 pm | Permalink

    Acomplia discount.

    Acomplia discount.

54. Ultram buy ultram online order cheap ultram.
    Posted September 13, 2008 at 1:59 pm | Permalink

    Ultram buy ultram online order cheap ultram.

    Cheap ultram. Cheap cod ultram. Order ultram cheap pharmacy. Ultram buy ultram online order cheap ultram.

55. Zithromax z-pak side effects.
    Posted September 15, 2008 at 6:29 pm | Permalink

    Zithromax.

    Zithromax. Zithromax and eye infections. Alcohol and zithromax. Generice name of zithromax. Azithromycin zithromax. Zithromax gonera dosage.

56. Cash advance.
    Posted September 16, 2008 at 9:31 pm | Permalink

    First american cash advance.

    Payday cash advance illinois. Cash advance illinois. Cash advance today. Discount cash loans personal cash advance. Advance cash online.

57. Plavix.
    Posted September 17, 2008 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

    Plavix.

    Plavix procedures. Cumadin vs plavix. Plavix. Plavix vs. baby asprin.

58. Ephedra pros.
    Posted September 18, 2008 at 12:02 pm | Permalink

    Ephedra pros.

    Ephedra pros.

59. Ultram tramadol.
    Posted October 6, 2008 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

    Tramadol cyclophoria buy tramadol generic ultram.

    Tramadol brand s ultram definition of drug. Ultram vs. tramadol. Ultram extended release tramadol. Tramadol ultram medicine. Tramadol ultram and acute pain. Ultram tramadol.

60. Payday loan.
    Posted October 8, 2008 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    No teletrack payday loan.

    Payday loan. Payday advance loan oregon. Instant payday loan.

61. Payday loan.
    Posted October 12, 2008 at 3:16 pm | Permalink

    Payday loan.

    Payday loan. Advance cash loan payday. Instant payday loan. Mr payday loan.

62. Elavil facts.
    Posted October 14, 2008 at 8:18 pm | Permalink

    Elavil.

    Elavil and high blood pressure or hypertension. Elavil used for. Elavil.

63. Payday advance loan.
    Posted October 15, 2008 at 2:11 pm | Permalink

    Payday loan interest rate.

    Payday loan stores. Is there a way out of the payday loan cycle. Payday advance loan oregon. Default payday loan.

64. Payday loans.
    Posted October 16, 2008 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    Payday loans articles.

    Not paying payday loans. Payday loans.

65. Quick cash loan.
    Posted October 17, 2008 at 4:08 am | Permalink

    Fast cash loan illinois.

    Quick cash loan. Quick cash loan wisconsin. Cash loan idaho. Cash unsecured bad credit personal loan.

66. Cardizem lyoject syringe.
    Posted October 18, 2008 at 4:18 am | Permalink

    Cardizem atrial fibrilation.

    Cardizem. Cardizem drug manufacturer.

67. Get out of payday loans.
    Posted October 18, 2008 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    Payday loans.

    Lowest fee payday loans. Guaranteed instant deposit in 1 hour payday loans. Payday loans. Instant payday loans. Laws about payday loans.