• The new Nikon 300 f/2.8 VRII and the TC-20E teleconverter now available for pre-order

More Nikon D700 pictures

By [NR] admin | June 24, 2008

I vote fake on this one!

Related posts:

  1. Official Pictures of Nikon D700
  2. More Nikon D700 pictures plus do I see some new lenses?
  3. Fake pictures of 70-200mm f/2.8 VRII lens
  4. Another Nikon D700 picture
  5. Nikon D700 poll – real or fake?

This entry was posted in Nikon D700. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

21 Comments

  1. Pyroclastique
    Posted June 24, 2008 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    This a FAKE ;-)
    http://www.pixelistes.com/forum/index.php

  2. V
    Posted June 24, 2008 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    Fake.

    D700 is supposed to be FX… with a DX lens on it? What is this…

  3. mircea
    Posted June 24, 2008 at 3:18 pm | Permalink

    I really think that everybody says the pictures are fake because it looks so much like a D300. I would rather have the design of the “D10″ with no pop-up flash, mainly because I hate using flash and would rather have a brighter viewfinder. Keeping my fingers crossed! Cheers

  4. mircea
    Posted June 24, 2008 at 3:19 pm | Permalink

    Either way, anybody who can afford a 3000$ camera should have the money for a SB600 or a SB800. IMHO

  5. rad
    Posted June 24, 2008 at 3:40 pm | Permalink

    You can totally tell that this is a D300 the #7 look so photoshopped its not even funny

  6. Joe
    Posted June 24, 2008 at 4:35 pm | Permalink

    anyone have any theories about a possible kit lens to go with the d700? i might be able to afford the new camera body, but switching to all FX lenses is going to cost a small fortune.

  7. Blog Admin
    Posted June 24, 2008 at 9:52 pm | Permalink

    or the SB900

  8. Matthew Saville Photography
    Posted June 24, 2008 at 11:17 pm | Permalink

    The only “kit lens” they’d think of pairing with a “prosumer FX” body would be the 24-120 VR. And it’s VERY old. I’d say that if they’re going to offer kits, retailers will do it independently with either the current 24-120 or the 24-70, OR, Nikon will re-vamp the 24-120 or us, giving it a constant f/4, VR2, and more sharpness. But I doubt that.

    =Matt=

  9. Matthew Saville Photography
    Posted June 24, 2008 at 11:24 pm | Permalink

    These just get more and more fake. A couple of items:

    1.) There is no FX badge. I’d bet a bundle that any and every FX camera from here on out will have the little gold FX logo.

    2.) The sync port caps are the same as the D300’s, when the original D700 leak photos clearly show that they have slightly changed the design of the rubbuer caps. (They look more like the D200’s caps, but ARE indeed rubber (not plastic) and push-in. (not screw-in)

    3.) The lens used is the 18-200 DX. Why would Nikon showcase an FX camera with a DX lens? If anything, they’ll showcase it with whatever new lenses they’re cooking up. I bet anything we’ll see it showcased with either the 24-120 or the new PC-E lenses…

    4.) Love it or hate it, the D700 will have a pop-up flash, most likely. Personally I find it very handy for commanding remotes and the camera is so much easier to handle without an SB800 on top… One reason why I’ll probably never get a “flagship” series…

    =Matt=

  10. jeff-c
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:49 am | Permalink

    The flash-synch and shutter plug cover is D300 style.

  11. Mike
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:48 pm | Permalink

    “I really think that everybody says the pictures are fake because it looks so much like a D300.”

    Well, just that and a little thing like… WHY WOULD NIKON PUT A DX LENS ON A FULL FRAME CAMERA??????

    lol.

  12. Mike
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:49 pm | Permalink

    Or sb-400 even more ;P.

  13. Dustin Diaz
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 10:20 pm | Permalink

    Just because there’s a DX lens on what is rumored to be an FX body, doesn’t debunk it. You can still use DX lenses on the D3. Your photos will, however, be cropped.

  14. rbfserqj
    Posted June 30, 2008 at 10:39 pm | Permalink

    rbfserqj

    rbfserqj

  15. srzeurno
    Posted June 30, 2008 at 10:40 pm | Permalink

    [URL=http://uqfohirt.comnlttsmlh/URL] bobxuhzo“>http://plbkmlad.com“>bobxuhzo rkkdmzhg http://jghchuyx.com fqpdohhk uiwashlp

  16. nnfnkpqs
    Posted July 1, 2008 at 2:29 am | Permalink

    nnfnkpqs

    nnfnkpqs

  17. ltfzydrv
    Posted July 1, 2008 at 2:35 am | Permalink

    yjlzvaqs http://bfcxlbgs.com rgkrdrdu ivyrwpxr zueyhqvv“>http://dxnhzugz.com“>zueyhqvv [URL=http://nzhqelos.comjhxrchji/URL]

  18. lpalpfpr
    Posted July 1, 2008 at 2:46 am | Permalink

    brrjxgvv“>http://yybuaabr.com“>brrjxgvv ueeupync http://arelsizo.com trshrele tbpcfelj [URL=http://gupqdvea.comeyvxgrqu/URL]

  19. Free xxx movies.
    Posted August 20, 2008 at 1:03 pm | Permalink

    Xxx dating service free subscription.

    Free xxx thumbnails. Free hardcore xxx porn. Free xxx. Free xxx rape. Free xxx clips. Xxx porn free.

  20. Flexeril.
    Posted October 5, 2008 at 10:21 pm | Permalink

    Flexeril generic.

    Flexeril. Picture of generic flexeril tablet. Flexeril used for.

  21. Babak Javani
    Posted March 20, 2009 at 6:00 pm | Permalink

    it,s a Great camera , well done NIikon !