< ! --Digital window verification 001 -->

Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD full frame lens with image stabilization announced

Tamron announced a full frame 24-70mm f/2.8 lens with built-in ultrasonic motor and image stabilization. Price and availability were not revealed.

Update: the price of the lens will be $1,274.00.

Press release:

Tamron develops full-size, high-speed standard zoom with built-in image stabilization – SP 24-70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD (Model A007)

February 6th, 2012, Saitama, Japan - Tamron Co., Ltd., a leading manufacturer of optical equipment, announced the development of the SP 24-70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD (Model A007), a full-size high-speed standard zoom lens equipped with VC ( Vibration Compensation) image stabilization and USD ( Ultrasonic Silent Drive), with resolution at the top of its class.

The price and availability of the SP 24-70mm will be announced at a later date.

Product Features

1. A full-size, high-speed standard zoom with built-in VC ( Vibration Compensation). Even when shooting in low-light conditions with a slow shutter speed to render sharpness, Tamron’s acclaimed VC allows for stable handheld camera work, to more fully enjoy the benefits of this high-speed zoom lens.

2. Uses special high-grade glass in the three LD elements, three glass molded aspherical lenses, one hybrid aspherical lens and two XR (Extra Refractive Index) glasses, delivering top-of-the-class quality images suited to this high-grade lens. Using a rounded diaphragm, the lens achieves gorgeous blur effects. This rounded diaphragm retains a nearly circular shape even when taken two stops down from its fully open state.

3. Features Tamron proprietary USD ( Ultrasonic Silent Drive) to power a speedy AF drive together with a continuous manual mechanism.

4. This high-speed standard zoom lens has a wide-end focal length of 24mm that expands the photographic area.

5. The lens adopts the new technology including the latest optical design, VC ( Vibration Compensation) image stabilization and USD ( Ultrasonic Silent Drive), all in a lighter and more compact package.

6. Moisture-resistant construction helps prevent water from penetrating the lens.

Specifications:

  • Model: A007
  • Focal length: 24-70mm
  • Maximum aperture: F/2.8
  • Angle of view (diagonal): 84°04’ -34°21’ (for full frame 35mm format cameras)
  • 60°20’ -22°33’ (for APS-C format cameras)
  • Lens construction: 17 elements in 12 groups
  • Minimum focus distance: 0.38m (15.0 in)
  • Maximum magnification ratio: 1:5 (at f=70mm: MFD 0.38m)
  • Filter size: φ82mm
  • Length: 108.5mm*
  • Entire Length: 116.9mm*
  • Diameter: φ88.2mm
  • Weight: 825g*
  • No. of diaphragm blades: 9 (rounded diaphragm)
  • Minimum aperture: F/22
  • Standard accessories: Flower-shaped lens hood
  • Compatible mounts: Canon, Nikon, Sony

* Length, entire length and weight values given are for the Nikon mount.
* Entire length is the distance between the tip of the lens and the tip of the protrusion.
* The Sony mount does not include VC, because the body of Sony digital SLR cameras includes image stabilization functionality. The product name for Sony cameras is “SP 24-70mm F/2.8 Di USD” without the VC designation.

VC ( Vibration Compensation)
VC ( Vibration Compensation) is Tamron’s proprietary image stabilization system. Tamron’s VC is a three-coil system, whereby three driving coils activate the shake-compensating VC lens group electromagnetically via three steel balls. The VC lens elements are held in place only by contact with the steel balls, achieving smooth movement with little friction. This provides a stable viewfinder image with excellent tracking performance. And as the VC lens may be moved in parallel using only the motorized control, the mechanical structure has been simplified, enabling the creation of a more compact lens.

New VC system (moving coil method)
Tamron’s original VC image stabilization mechanism utilized a moving magnet system whereby a heavy magnet was positioned near the moving VC lens element. In the new VC unit the positions of the magnet and the coil are reversed, because of this the VC optical lens element is attached to the coil. The new VC mechanism employs a moving coil mechanism with a lightweight coil, and the lighter coil reduces the load on the drive system. Thus, the lighter, more compact new VC unit contributes to the lens’s overall light weight and compact size.

Because the 24-70 mm F/2.8 Di VC USD is a high-speed zoom lens with maximum aperture of F/2.8, its VC system must drive a lens that is larger and heavier than other zooms. Therefore, the shape, size and layout of the drive coils are all designed to obtain sufficient thrust. The result is a full-size, high-speed zoom that provides the same high level of compensation effect.

About the ultrasonic motor
In the ultrasonic motor, a piezoelectric element arranged in a ring formation generates ultrasonic vibrations in a metallic ring stator, and the vibration energy is used to rotate a metallic ring rotor that is attached to the stator. The rotation energy is in turn transferred from the metallic ring rotor to operate the focus lens.

This entry was posted in Nikon Lenses and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.
  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/ilovewalkman/ Abhinav

    Such release may put pressure on nikon or canon to come up 24-70mm with VR or IS.

    • http://haroldellis4444@gmail.com Harold Ellis

      i wish
      but i want a lens with internal zoom and focus.
      not interesting.

      • karl

        which of the 24-70 lenses have internal zoom ? both nikon and canon extend when zooming

        • http://haroldellis4444@gmail.com Harold Ellis

          none and thats the problem, but nikon at least extend only little and inside a hood.

          i liked 35-70, it was also extending, but when beaten to the front, it didnt broked but collapsed.

          • http://haroldellis4444@gmail.com Harold Ellis

            or if they would at least make something like 35-105 but FX
            24-70 is getting boring.

            • T.I.M

              @Harold Ellis
              If I have to make a choice between optical quality and look, I prefer the image quality.
              Lens manufacturers have to deal with optic physics laws.
              It’s already great to have autofocus, internal focusing, aspherical lens, constant aperture and VR available.

            • Photdog

              @ T.I.M
              For that matter physics is not really the problem. One would just have to take in account that the physical length of the lens would increase to achieve internal focus.
              @ Mr. Ellis
              I agree with you. Would love to see an AF-S Nikon with internal zoom & focus and VR II at f2.8 and 77mm filter thread if possible.
              Hopefully a tad better concerning the optics as we have to deal with up to 36 MP soon.

            • tigrebleu

              Agreed, a 35-105mm F/2.8 FX lens (or a 50-135mm F/2.8 FX) would be a perfect complement to the 16-35 VR, while giving the user extend reach the 24-70mm F/2.8 doesn’t have.

              Yes, there is a 24-120m mF/4 FX lens, but it’s F/4 instead of F/2.8, and performance at the tele end is reduced because of the rather ambitious zoom range.

              While a 5x zoom is not ambitious for an amateur-enthusiast product, it is ambitious for an expert-pro zoom. Most pro zoom don’t go far beyond the 3x ratio: 12-24mm F/4 DX, 14-24mm F/2.8, 16-35mm F/4, 17-35mm F/2.8, 17-55mm F/2.8 DX, 24-40mm F/2.8, 70-200mm F/2.8, 80-200mm, and F/2.8, 200-400mm F/4. All these zooms aren’t much more than 3x. The wider the zoom ratio gets pushed, the more image quality gets compromised.

              And as such, a 35-105mm F/2.8 FX would still be a 3x zoom, with less IQ compromises.

              I’d rather do a 50-135mm F/2.8 FX lens, though. The added reach would be welcome (without the bulk of a 70-200mm F/2.8), and the gap between 16-35 and 50-135 can be taken care by making one step foward or one step back.

              Just my two cents.

            • http://haroldellis4444@gmail.com Harold Ellis

              TIM: the problem is that new lenses are not robust enough. One beat on the ground or wall when trying to catch moment and the zooming mechanism was broken.
              Also the hood is too big and screw on hood wont help when it is not internally zooming.

      • IndyGeoff

        As do I .. I like lenses that have internal zoom

      • KL

        Just curious, internal zoom to reduce dust intake, bumping up to objects during close-up photography or for other reasons?

      • 120-300 OS

        Well that´s why i have now the sigma 120-300 os nick name the Black swan Cisne negra zwarte Zwaan.

        • 120-300 OS

          And that´s why i want the D800 and D400 when batpack fit´s both.

    • sade

      Not necessarily. Tamron, canon and sigma, all have 17-55 ish f/2.8 lenses with VR for years but still there is no Nikon equivalent lens with VR.
      I am sure that even if Nikon produces 24-70 VR, it will be so big and pricy that still many photographers prefer to have/keep the older version.

      • http://haroldellis4444@gmail.com Harold Ellis

        VR makes no sense under 80mm and fast lens

        • Dolph Lundgren

          Sure, I guess that’s why Nikon put VR in their 16-35mm zoom lens …

        • thw

          Obviously, you assume everyone shoots events and nothing else.

        • doodah

          You obvious think everyone shoots events with f shorter than 80 mm lenses and nothing else.

        • http://www.amanochocolate.com Art

          It all depends on what you want to do. For example, I would love to have a 24-70 with VR for photography in cathedrals in Europe where it is relatively dark and tripods are not allowed.

          • Dan

            I agree. There are plenty of situations where VR would be helpful with my 24-70. I’ve seen over and over again how much stabilization helps with my compact cameras, even at short focal lengths.

            • texajoe

              16-35 has VR

            • Photdog

              @ Texas Jo
              yes, but its 4.0 and comes with that much distortion that I’m thinking about to switch to the Nikon 17-35/2,8
              Anyone out there, who have both lenses and can compare?

            • tigrebleu

              Yes, that’s why there is VR in the 16-35, even though this ultrawide to wide zoom is far from being close to the standard to short tele focal lengths, were VR starts to be “more useful”.

              Coming from a Pentax DSLR with built-in SR (Shake Reduction), I can confirm image stabilization can make the difference between success and failure in low light with short focal lengths (even though image stabilization is slightly less efficient with wide angle FL than with telephoto FL). The 1 to 1.5 F-stop advantage I’d get with wide angle was better than nothing, even if it wasn’t as good as the 2.5 to 3 F-stops advantage I would get in telephoto).

              Saying that VR isn’t useful on a 24-70mm because it doesn’t has long enough telephoto reach is like saying VR isn’t useful on a 400mm+ lens because you should use a tripod with such long tele lenses anyways.

              Even a fisheye lens could benefit from VR. It’s just that the benefits of VR would be so marginal on such a lens, it wouldn’t justify the higher price tag.

              So yes, VR can be useful at any focal length, including wide and ultrawide ones. The real issue is in fact is VR useful to you or not and is the higher price okay to you or not.

          • Roger

            +1

        • http://frisianphotography.wordpress.com/ FrisianPhotography

          How about for the occasional hand-held filming?

        • mitch

          you dont know what youre talking about

    • http://www.4togadget.com/ HotDuckZ

      It is 82mm filter size, Hope Nikon still use 77mm. :(

  • http://www.cpearson.me.uk Chris Pearson

    Be interesting to see the price on this and the quality of the images. Does look awfully plasticy though.

    • KL

      Can you point out what in the image above gives the appearance that its made of plastic?

  • Adam

    Dang, 82mm filter size. Lets hope the IQ is as good as what they claim.

    • Dweeb

      Yeah Sigma and Zeiss just don’t get it. For quite a few lenses the killer is having to buy several hundred dollars of their goofy filter sizes. That’s cost them quite a bit from this guy. If it’s not 77 forget it.

      • Drew Hoover

        lol what does anyone use filters for anymore?

  • Photo

    How about d800 news? Any update?

  • http://richardcromptonphotography.com RichM0nster

    Mmm, something that might make Nikon venture into VR for their 24-70. Interesting. Not sure it would make me purchase though. My 24-70 is a sweet lens.

    • karl

      given how Tamron has destroyed it’s 17-50 f2.8 when they added VC, I don’t expect this new lens to be of any interest to those, who consider buying the original nikon/canon version.

  • fringuello

    Mmmm zeiss 24 70 putt on sony is stabilized too, but has bad resolution… hope nikon dont die with sonys tecnology

  • http://www.natugrafia.com Filipe Caetano

    Please change the title to “…full frame lens with image stabilization announced”

    I agree with Abhinav.

    • NemoSum

      I quite like the idea of a mage stabilizing the lens.

      • ozzmania

        Yes, mage stabilization is great when your wizard has had a little too much to drink.

    • telecomm

      Mages are likely to offer the absolute best in image stabilization.

      • Stefan

        Only arcane mages level 50 and above who mastered the freeze-time spell.

        • El_Pickerel

          I heard the Nikon 24-70 will use their new SP technology, where the lens comes with its own Shinto priest who calls upon the gods to remove any camera shake, as well as increase the effective existing light by one stop over existing conditions.

          • Calibrator

            They already employed Shinto priest when making the 13 mm F5.6 – at least to KEN ROCKWELL… ;-)

    • Rob

      Tamron actually calls it “Wizard Equalization” to get around Nikon’s patent.

      • Goose

        YOOUUUU SHAAAALL NOT PAAAAASS!

  • Jimmy

    I would be interested in taking a punt at this if they’d only designed it with the hood attachment on the body itself (like Nikon’s 24-70, 17-55).

    OK, so the hood has to be bigger to accommodate the extension of the lens, but it is less susceptible to dust ingress, accidental knocks etc.

  • Psycho McCrazy

    And here I was just about to drop a ton of $$$ on the Nikkor! This throws a spanner into the works!!! Needta see reviews!!!!!

  • gonzalo

    Tamron has been doing very good lenses lately.
    I have a 17-50F2.8 dx, a 90F2.8 Macro (BEST LENS EVER!), and a 70-300F4-5.6VC. All of them gives nikon a run for their money, specially the 17-50.
    I will wait for the tests of this lens (lenstips, photozone, fm, etc), but if i ever switch to fx… this will be my main lens.

  • Aaron

    There is something about tamrons that look extremely tacky. The build quality doesn’t look great either, happy to be corrected tho

    • Kirk Vagg F A Photog

      +1

    • Art K.

      This one looks exactly like a Nikkor zoom. Tamron are finally doing their design homework.

  • Steve

    Mage Stabilization…for the older mage less steady on his feet.

  • Baraldi

    I’ve had a Tamron 17-50 2.8 and now I have a Nikkor 17-55 2.8.

    The Nikkor worth every cent …

    Today I would prefer a nikkor 50mm 1.8G than a Tamron or Sigma 24-70 …

  • Adnan

    A LOT depends on the price and the image quality. I REALLY hope its a winner in terms of both!

  • Slow speed

    Canon’s new 24mm and 28mm prime has IS.

  • JakeBarnes

    Don’t think I’ll be trading my Nikon 24-70 f2.8 for this.

    On the other hand, I’m very interested in Tokina’s 70-200 f4. Now there’s a quality lens maker.

  • Christopher

    I have the old Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 lens, and it performs magnificently, sharp with creamy smooth bokeh. It’s a little difficult with AF in low-light conditions than an equivalent Nikkor lens but at less than 1/2 the price, you can’t really complain, and with the AF beam from the SB-910 on top of the camera it focuses fine in low light.

    If this 24-70mm f/2.8 VC can deliver similar optical performance with added VC then I may consider getting this!

  • http://www.photobubble.ro Catalin

    the weather seal sounds good. my current tamron 28-75 lacks this feature and it was really a must have on this type of lens

  • neversink

    HUH!!!!! Just another plastic lens???

    I don’t understand this format anyway…. I have the 14-24, 17-35, 50 (1.4), 70-200, 105 Micro, 35 and 24 prime….

    Unless I am a wedding photog, which I am not, why does one even need this ranger.. I’d rather work with a 50 or one of my other lenses… I would never use it, myself, but I know pros who love their 24-70. Different strokes for different folks….

    • UA

      Simple, you can go from 24mm to 70mm without changing a lens. And the current 24-70/2.8 from Nikon is excellent on those two ranges. If you do arts, you can go with primes. If you do events or journalistic photos, zooming is a must (unless you like changing lens constantly and want to expose your camera to dust and moisture often).

      Something like 75% of my pictures are taken either at 24mm or 70mm. The rest 25% of the pics are taken with 70-200 and ranges vary more. I mainly shoot events.

      So instead of carrying 5 or so lenses, I carry one or two.. and 2.8 is fast enough 99% of the time, if you do not mind using ISO6400 or if you are not bokeh junkie.

  • Some guy

    External zoom/focus and 82mm filter size aside, these specs could make this lens best in class.

    Remember, at the end of the day its all about Image Quality. And the extra effort to make a nearly round aperture at 2 stops down from wide open are nice touches to that end. Nice engineering thought leadership.

  • Thai Tom

    this is it…the ultimate walk-around low light lens….F2.8 VC

  • Zoron

    Sigma will be second to release a mid-range F2.8 OS lens…..cant wait

  • Nirvana

    Had a 17-50 BIM and I won’t buy another Tamron’s.

  • Fiatlux

    Had a 17-50 bim too, and loved the IQ , the lightweight and small size (67mm filter). Construction was very good, even if plasticky.

    Now have a 28-70 2.8 afs which is very good but definitely not lightweight. I would have considered a lighter Tamron alternative.

    But with VC and 82mm filters, this Tamron is almost as heavy and probably just as large…

  • Kabouter buttplug

    Hopefully the price will be nice. I’m thinking to buy a d700 and a 24-70 nikon is too expensive for me. I’m just a hobby photographer and there are not much normal price lenses like this one. Now I have a 17-50 tamron and like it a lot. It’s verry sharp. The only problem is that it’s noisy.

  • http://ronscubadiver.wordpress.com Ron Scubadiver

    Two questions, how good is it optically, and how much does it cost? I presently shoot with a Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 BIM. If this lens is anywhere near as sharp and around $800 street price, I just might buy one.

    • danpe

      Release date would be nice to know, does Tamron announce things years ahead as Sigma does and Canon recently started doing?

  • Doug

    Mr. Admin. even if there was someone interested on the Tamron lenses atm in time they would be craving for news about the D800, not about V1 J1 Tamron, i know im bitching but hey at least im writing about not just wondering.

    • http://nikonrumors.com/ [NR] admin

      What other D800 news do you need? I got everything already.

      • mlu

        price?

        • http://nikonrumors.com/ [NR] admin

          around 2,800 EUR for the D800

  • http://sepetaweddings.com Matt

    ^

    I am interested in any 24-70 fast stabilized lens.

    I am NOT interested in the D800.

    Weird, I know.

  • Geoff

    Quote: “Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD full frame lens with mage stabilization announced”

    How does this lens stabilize nearby wizards????

  • http://www.nikonplanet.com MC

    Since Tamron 28-75/2.8 is a steal for the money I believe that the new 24-70/2.8 with stabilization must be definitely a step forward. I see Tamron is improving the quality of its products despite the plasticky look and feel. Also the huge front element requiring a 82mm filter is a clear sign of a superior light transmission quality of this new lens. I am very impatient to test it.

  • Camaman

    82mm filter!
    Hello!!! Damn.

  • Stefan

    I love it – not sure about image quality or anything from Tamron, but i like that they offer a fast normal-angle zoom with image stabilization. If Nikon is going for megapixels then image stabilization will be a must to actually use the added resolution .. their existing 24-70mm won’t cut it any longer without VR.

  • El_Pickerel

    First Tokina announces a 70-200 f/4 VR, and now Tamron pulls out a 24-70 f/2.8 VC? I’ll definitely wait on reviews but this might finally be a midrange zoom for me to get. (Currently have the Tokina 28-80 f/2.8 but just use primes instead due to its terrible IQ)

  • Wade

    The good news is that they are finally stabalizing those pesky Mages.

  • Doug

    wow, nice one.

  • Dorian

    Any word on the price?

    • KL

      Admin did note that the price wasn’t revealed, but if they keep with the pricing of their current product line I would guess it would be between $600 and $700 USD.

  • grantourismo

    I know this question has nothing to do with this post, sorry for that, but at what time will the D800 announcement be in european time? London time. Greatful if someone could reply.

    • Doug

      midnight ;p

      • grantourismo

        Thanks! But 5 in the morning seems more likely.

    • WoutK89

      5am if I am not mistaken.

      • grantourismo

        Thank you!

  • http://na dino

    Two things:
    1) My opinion is mostly positive although I don’t like that much such focal lenght range. I’d have preferred a 28-90 F/2.8 (with the pretence to do later a 90 F/2 lol) or a 28-135 F/4 – 70 is SO short for portraiture !

    2) My copy of 28-75 is very very good. It’s now 6 yrs old and asks to be replaced but it worked a lot and I hope my next standard zoom is at least as good as it was. Actually, I had a 90 macro (replaced with a 100 Zeiss given a little fortune) and I do have ALSO the 70-200 and couldn’t be happier of the three lenses I got from Tamron. Nikon? My only Nikon lens is the 50 F/1.4 actually, plus a 200 F/4 AIS

    • http://na dino

      Oh, I forgot this..
      a 28-85/90/135 would also avoid such a large filter size….. Actually, it’s the only real “cons” of the lens.

  • http://www.jpgmag.com/people/markwjr Mark

    Canon 5Dx will be announced February 28, at a price of $2700. Any chance Nikon will take their price down to match or come close? Although, there have been quite a few rumors of them staying below $3k..

    As for the Tamron lens, damn. I JUST got the Sigma 24-70mm F/2.8 IF EX DG HSM II. It’s a spectacular lens. If this one performs just as well, I may have to jump ship to have the VC for events.

    Mark

  • Ong Arttasan

    Typo on the headline.

    Image not Mage I supposed.

  • UA

    Most likely this will be a sharp lens with semidecent build quality and bad AF problems.

    Old screw type 3rd party lenses focused great. These with ultrasonic motors seem to be more or less trial-and-error -type. Eventually, they’ll drive you crazy. I’ll stick with lenses from Nikon.

    VR is a nice addition to the 24-70/2.8, but not really compulsory (what it is in 70-200). Just more moving parts that can go wrong. I can shoot 1/10 handheld at 24mm without major problems, if the ground is steady. So VR is beneficial, but not necessary. If Nikon releases 24-70/2.8 with VR some day, I might consider upgrading, if the price does not go much higher.

  • KL

    Does the 82mm filter size give any indication of the actual size of the lens elements – also would a larger diameter lens produce better IQ at the edges of the picture as compared to a lens which has a 77mm filter size?

    • UA

      Using 82mm should allow thicker filters/produce less vignetting at wide end. 77mm @ 24mm adds vignetting quite easily. Should not affect on any other way to the IQ.

  • Fabian

    First the Tokina 70-200 f/4 VR and now this? Nikon needs to get with the program. The 3rd-party manufacturers are starting to take the lead in lens design.

  • Sat

    Are people going to be selling the D4 for more than its asking price once it is sold out?

  • http://lgphotoart.com LGPhotoArt

    I really love my Tamron 28-75 f/2.8, so I bought the 17-50 f/2.8 with VC and I am disappointed. The VC actually works really well, although its quite different from the Nikon one, but the lack of sharpness at 50mm f2.8 just does not do it for me, so I am thinking to move to the non VC version. Hopefully Tamron did not repeat the mistake, I am looking forward to try out this lens.

  • fringuello
    • InTheMist

      Hm, also 82mm. Is Tamron the manufacturer of this L lens? Quite the coincidence with the timing.

  • http://southfloridapics.com Jose S.

    I like it. This should make it possible for people to upgrade to make the move from DX to FX with a smaller initial investment, as compared to buying a comparable Nikon FX lens such as the Nikkor 24-70 2.8.

  • http://www.chrisandcami.com Chris & Cami

    With the way HD Video is becoming incorporated in new cameras, VR makes very good sense even on wide-angle lenses. A Nikon Rep told me that’s why the new 16-35 has it. So I suspect the next iteration of the 24-70 will too. I for one am all for it!!!

  • KR

    Can’t wait to get this and mount it on myD3s and take better pictures than those guys with 24-70 ha ha

  • Chris Lilley

    Hopefully this is just as resistant to axial chromatic aberration as their SP 70-300 – the lack of fringes and purity of color on that lens surprised me (compared to the Nikon equivalent). Look forward to reading tests on this.

  • Back to top