You know this one was coming (Nikon lens coffee mug)

When Canon came up with their coffee mugs during the last Winter Olympics, I thought for a moment that they may really have better stuff than Nikon. Today I got my faith back - the Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 coffee mug is "now available for pre-order" on eBay icon smile You know this one was coming (Nikon lens coffee mug)

nikon 24 70 coffee mug You know this one was coming (Nikon lens coffee mug)

But wait, there is more - for all you caffeine addicts: the Nikon Lens AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Coffee Cup is also available:

nikon 70 200 coffee mug You know this one was coming (Nikon lens coffee mug) nikon 70 200 coffee mug 2 You know this one was coming (Nikon lens coffee mug)

Prices vary, to see all Nikon mug entries on eBay click here.

Related posts:

  1. Much better deal on that Nikon lens coffee mug
  2. Who wants a Nikon lens speaker?
  3. Poland: 10% price increase coming at you
  4. Expected prices of upcoming Nikon lenses
  5. New Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.4 G lens coming in September
This entry was posted in Nikon Humor Rumor. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

111 Comments

  1. Karl Guevara
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 9:10 am | Permalink

    We. Are. Saved.

    • Banned
      Posted June 3, 2010 at 10:10 am | Permalink

      $50 for a mug????!

      • stepper
        Posted June 3, 2010 at 11:09 am | Permalink

        I guess isnce this a photo related item then the “you get what you pay for” cliche still applies – hopefully. Regardless, I can’t resist!!!

      • Tabitha Green
        Posted June 3, 2010 at 12:17 pm | Permalink

        At that price this is a complete joke. $50 for $1 worth of plastic. D:

        • GlobalGuy
          Posted June 3, 2010 at 1:12 pm | Permalink

          Is it safe to even drink from these things — how is it certified? Do you trust this manufacturer?

          Lead poisoning and other leeching agents may be at play — the type of PAINT & coatings on the cup is particularly in need of explanation. I would not drink out of this mug unless there was a third-party certification by a reliable source.

          Any illegal use of a brand/id/corporate logo shows me that there is not likely any concern for law or safety involved in this product.

          • iamlucky13
            Posted June 3, 2010 at 5:39 pm | Permalink

            It’s probably safe to assume the nano-coatings cause cancer. On the plus side, the AF-S motor can be repurposed to stir in your coffee and sugar, while VR helps prevent spills when traveling on bumpy roads.

            As for price, 77mm lens cap alone retails for around $20!

            On a more serious note, plastic molded components are really cheap if you make enough of them, but the initial cost of the molds can be quite high. While I have no doubt there’s a very big novelty markup, just because you can get a plain travel mug produced in volumes of tens of thousands per year at Target for $10 doesn’t mean the unit cost for these before profit is that low.

      • Anonymous
        Posted June 3, 2010 at 3:08 pm | Permalink

        It’s as overpriced as the lenses themselves.

      • ali
        Posted June 5, 2010 at 11:40 pm | Permalink

        No, $50 for the Nikon logo!! Bwahahahaha! $1.50 for the actual mug if you are a great shopper. The logo itself is what jacks up the price of this insane idea of a coffee travel mug.

    • Johan Krüger-Haglert
      Posted June 3, 2010 at 11:58 am | Permalink

      The 70-200/4L mug look way hotter though =p

      • Tabitha Green
        Posted June 3, 2010 at 12:18 pm | Permalink

        Sure does! :)

  2. Karl Guevara
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 9:11 am | Permalink

    Great info in the auction: “This is NOT an actual lens! You can NOT attach this to your camera, and it is mug that can contain hot liquid.”

    • Johan Krüger-Haglert
      Posted June 3, 2010 at 11:59 am | Permalink

      Fail!

      One can attach the 70-200/4L mug to a Canon body :D

      Turn it on the highest FPS, hold the shutter release and hope the sensor keep the chocolate milk hot? :D

      • GlobalGuy
        Posted June 3, 2010 at 1:16 pm | Permalink

        Are they going to make a Mug-to-Nikon adapter?? =P

        • quilmore
          Posted June 4, 2010 at 3:12 am | Permalink

          will a coffee on this mug give you better “focus” on your work/study than the canon equivalent will? :-p

        • Karl Guevara
          Posted June 4, 2010 at 9:24 am | Permalink

          I am waiting for an M version with adaptor for M43, so we can have espressos from a Summicron.

  3. Posted June 3, 2010 at 9:16 am | Permalink

    For once, the 70-200 VRII might be *too* big…

  4. Bauke
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 9:27 am | Permalink

    This great, I immediately ordered one

  5. Chris L
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 9:28 am | Permalink

    I’ll drink to that!

    • Vladi
      Posted June 3, 2010 at 6:37 pm | Permalink

      Viva la Depeche Mode!

  6. Anonymous
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 9:33 am | Permalink

    Hopefully Nikon will actually deliver this coffee mug. But my best bet is to see “out of stock” :-)

    • GlobalGuy
      Posted June 3, 2010 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

      6 months waiting list. ;-)

  7. preston
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 9:37 am | Permalink

    no – keep trying though :)

  8. preston
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 9:40 am | Permalink

    $40 for a coffee mug?? That’s very cool, but I’d rather save that money for a real 70-200 VRII.

    • Pat
      Posted June 3, 2010 at 11:05 am | Permalink

      Or apply this $40 towards half the cost of a Nikon 77mm clear filter I always think is too expensive…

      • Posted June 3, 2010 at 8:03 pm | Permalink

        mine was half price at Adorama when I bought mine a few months ago.

  9. taurui
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 9:45 am | Permalink

    Finally!!! :D

  10. Posted June 3, 2010 at 9:47 am | Permalink

    About the only 70-200 VRII that I’ll be able to afford :(

  11. Alexander
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 9:50 am | Permalink

    I’m waiting for the Sigma 200-500/2.8 coffe mug…

    http://www.cyberphoto.se/?http://www.cyberphoto.se/info.php?article=200500c

    • neuro
      Posted June 3, 2010 at 11:53 am | Permalink

      nooo that would be for beer not coffe XD!!!

      • Johan Krüger-Haglert
        Posted June 3, 2010 at 12:02 pm | Permalink

        With recent and future advancement in beer manufacturing that would be a little excessive:
        http://idle.slashdot.org/story/10/06/02/1231248/The-Race-To-Beer-With-50-Alcohol-By-Volume

        • GlobalGuy
          Posted June 3, 2010 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

          Beer is not meant to be hard alcohol. How are you supposed to drink a 6 pack, if it kills you in the process and tastes too strong to boot.

          They are better off selling watered down hops with nice flavors.

          • Alexander
            Posted June 8, 2010 at 11:22 am | Permalink

            My favourite beer for the moment is Mikkeller Jackie Brown.

  12. Click
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 10:03 am | Permalink

    Nikon is really “Proud” of anything with their name on it? Like most items, they are the most expensive and “Out of Stock” of course you can put your name on a list.

    Check out this lens technology, Surely this will be adopted by DSLR videographers. Technology is advancing in leaps & bounds.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eq8eD9zU7p4&feature=player_embedded

  13. Steve
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 10:08 am | Permalink

    OK, two things come to mind when I look at this:

    1. Walking up to an overlook to take a photo with it in my hand, then taking a drink out of my lens in front of everyone. That ought to freak ‘em out a bit eh?

    2. Leaving the lens in the cupholder of my truck only to come back and find it was broken into because someone thought it was a real lens.

    • GlobalGuy
      Posted June 3, 2010 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

      Yeah, but you’ll have insurance and a new window. The thief is going to have a bloody hand and a cup.

      • preston
        Posted June 4, 2010 at 12:46 am | Permalink

        yea, and then he’s so pissed that he sets your car on fire. .

  14. Posted June 3, 2010 at 10:09 am | Permalink

    Will the VRII stabilize my shaking hands after a whole pot of coffee?

    • Astrophotographer
      Posted June 3, 2010 at 1:24 pm | Permalink

      I was thinking the same thing. I could use a coffee cup with VR.

      • i_want_a_D900
        Posted June 3, 2010 at 2:40 pm | Permalink

        The VR would stablize the mug only , not your hand, sorry!

  15. Gary
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 10:20 am | Permalink

    And the prices are about the same as the Real Lenses!
    We must have the word “stupid” tattooed across our foreheads.:-)

  16. pb
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 10:25 am | Permalink

    24-70 is great, but I will wait for the VR version ;)

  17. tsnake
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 10:41 am | Permalink

    BFD, honestly, I could not care less about Nikon memorabilia.
    All I want to read is that a D700 size body with 25mp, ISO 12800, 5 fps, and 51 focus points for $3000 has been officially announced. Oh, and they can skip the video. If and when I want to become a videotographer I will buy a video camera.

  18. daniel
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 10:51 am | Permalink

    I want one!
    Maybe this is what I was waiting for to start drinking coffee

  19. Zoetmb
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 11:00 am | Permalink

    Did this guy get a license from Nikon to produce these? Because if he didn’t, I think he’s going to be shut down real soon.

    And these look a little too good to be true. Are those photos of the cups or slightly modified Photoshopped photos of the actual lenses? If those aren’t the actual cups (and I don’t think they are), you might be a little disappointed as to how they actually look. Although the “lens cap” does look thicker than a real cap and looks like it was designed to keep the liquid in. Which is actually too bad because a real Nikon lens cap costs something like $16.

    Anyways, the guy seems to be getting bids, so assuming he does have a license, he’s a genius for being able to sell $50 coffee cups. He probably gets a bigger % margin than Nikon does on some of the actual low-end lenses.

    • stepper
      Posted June 3, 2010 at 11:41 am | Permalink

      Good point. The photos of the mug look way too good to be real. And with the relatively low feedback ratings of the sellers I find it just a tad bit suspect as to whether or not these things actually exist – or will ever exist for that matter.

      • stepper
        Posted June 3, 2010 at 11:47 am | Permalink

        Come to think of it, although they are probably legit, this would make for a near perfect scam. Offer auctions for a pre-order item and tell the buyer that the item will take up to 35 days for delivery when Ebay’s window to file for complaints is only 30 days (example only, I have no clue how long the complaint window is opened).

        • Posted June 3, 2010 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

          Regardless of the complaint window`s length, good luck with eBay helping you with anything. At least, I`ve never gotten any help, much less response from them.

  20. Bob
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 11:01 am | Permalink

    While the lens mug would be really neat to have, I don’t see anyway to justify spending $40-50 plus $10 for shipping for a mug! Maybe Nikon will include one with the purchase of a DSLR body.

  21. Darkness
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 11:04 am | Permalink

    The 24-70 looks big enough for nespresso…

  22. Anonymous
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 11:07 am | Permalink

    Easy way for photographers to sneak in liquor at sporting events? highly likely.

    • Anonymous
      Posted June 3, 2010 at 12:32 pm | Permalink

      YES! LMAO…

  23. Jay A
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 11:19 am | Permalink

    Nikon needs an F4 version of the mug…otherwise noway

  24. Anonymous
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 11:23 am | Permalink

    What if you accidentally brought your lens to work instead of the mug? That could be disastrous on so many levels… lol

  25. Anonymous
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 11:25 am | Permalink

    I bet it smells and tastes like plastic too..

  26. Geo
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 11:39 am | Permalink

    You can hold more coffee by attaching a TC-1.7E II

  27. Blocky Face
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 11:49 am | Permalink

    One guy did review of Canon mugs and plastic one (24-105) smelled and coffee tasted like, well – plastic.So I guess it’s only good for keeping your pens and pencils in.(then $45 +s&h is way too much).

    Canon’s 70-200 was stainless steel inside, so no plastic aftertaste.

    We’ll see if Nikon versions are better…

    • jim
      Posted June 3, 2010 at 6:09 pm | Permalink

      Nikon’s is always better!!!!

      • Anonymous
        Posted June 5, 2010 at 8:30 pm | Permalink

        Only fools believe…

  28. Anonymous
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 11:50 am | Permalink

    http://www.nikonmall.com/detail/NIK+5547

    1/10th of the price and doesn’t taste like plastic!

    • preston
      Posted June 3, 2010 at 7:34 pm | Permalink

      . . and doesn’t look like a lens, which is the entirely novelty.

  29. Posted June 3, 2010 at 11:57 am | Permalink

    prices will probably go down once this comes to the US (if it is legal of course)

    • jim
      Posted June 3, 2010 at 6:10 pm | Permalink

      Will it be offered in grey market? Will NIkon USA service any warranty claims–e.g., my cup develops a leak, the coffee tastes stale, etc.

      • Posted June 3, 2010 at 9:32 pm | Permalink

        wait for the bundle with the D3 “keep warm/re-boil base”.

  30. thefunk
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 12:00 pm | Permalink

    Surely no-one is actually going to buy one of these ?

  31. thefunk
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 12:13 pm | Permalink

    ever been mugged ?

  32. fzz
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 12:23 pm | Permalink

    those ebay dealers are mainly from HK, they import from China at about USD 10 each, i saw it on taobao.com (which equivalent to ebay in China)

  33. Anonymous
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 12:40 pm | Permalink

    It has begun.

  34. Coffee adicted Edwar
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 1:13 pm | Permalink

    Well it´s better buy the 70-200 mug it´s a littlebit more plastic for the money 5 dollars oke mabe10 photo related but 50 no way Jose

  35. Digitalux
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

    Nice. My reseller always gives me goodies…

  36. Posted June 3, 2010 at 1:22 pm | Permalink

    The price seems a little steep but that’s flippin awesome. I’d buy one just to throw around and scare people with. “Oops oh sheet, I just dropped a $2500 lens!”

    As someone else said, the 70-200 would be a huge drink cup. I think that a 24-70 would be just about right. Although an inverted 14-24 might make for a nice desktop mug with a wide stable base.

  37. Coffee addicted
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 1:25 pm | Permalink

    Well i want an 300mm vr 2 or 200-400vr2 mug funny variable coffee mug oh and open please a nikon store in Medellin Colombia that makes me original dutch and a lot professional photographers happy we still have to get almost everything from nikon via USA Europe or panama

  38. Posted June 3, 2010 at 1:42 pm | Permalink

    I agree. $40-50 for a coffee mug, even this cool, is dumber than $8,000 for the D3x when it launched…

  39. longtimenikonshooter
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 2:01 pm | Permalink

    they’ve switched their production from making lenses to making coffee mugs? what’s their core business?

  40. chunkee
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    Ordered Two already
    costing @ US$12~~~
    coz ordering with another 40 guys~~~
    (China shipping to Macau)~~~

  41. Anonymous
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 3:20 pm | Permalink

    Imagine getting beaten up and mugged for your coffee…

    “no honestly this is not a lens….. it is my beverage!!???!!…help”

    lol

  42. Posted June 3, 2010 at 3:57 pm | Permalink

    Am I the ONLY commenter in over NINETY comments to call this BLATANT photochop? The 24-70 especially, it is SO clearly just a photoshopped empty space on top of a normal 24-70. The 70-200 looks similarly photoshopped with what looks like the inside of a generic metal pipe. The inside just doesn’t match the lighting of the outside, and the edge is just so clearly a photoshop trick. I’m sorry…

    And if anyone has seen the Canon mugs, they’re hardly this good of reproductions, they’re just cheap vacuum-formed plastic.

    I’m just saying. Everyone is right to balk at the $40 price, and talk about how society is descending into materialism since people WOULD pay that much for such a product, …but you all get an EPIC FAIL for not noticing the photoshop. Sorry!

    I bet this guy is just taking the money and running. Either that or, he hopes to get enough sales to actually START production on a cheapo, vacuum-formed plastic version that will look nothing like this.

    =Matt=

    • preston
      Posted June 3, 2010 at 7:50 pm | Permalink

      But it looks like this is a REAL ebay entry, meaning HE WILL TAKE YOUR MONEY! And this won’t even finish production until July, but he’s “pre selling” it now – yea this is definitely a scam like someone mentioned earlier. Everyone is saying (including me) that $40 is too much for a mug, but if it really duplicated the lens to that level of detail, like the same speckled texture on the metal between the rings, then it would cost a lot more than this.

  43. thefunk
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 4:07 pm | Permalink

    I eat my breakfast from a rusty old paint tin. I phoned this guy in china and he said it would be fine as long as I sent him $20. Quids in.

  44. Posted June 3, 2010 at 4:30 pm | Permalink

    how upset would the common car thug be if he to go to the trouble of breaking into my car for nothing more than a coffee mug

  45. lunar
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 4:50 pm | Permalink

    where is the hood?

  46. jim
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 6:12 pm | Permalink

    I’m waiting for my D700X coffee mug, otherwise I’m switching to Canon!

    • Christina
      Posted June 3, 2010 at 9:56 pm | Permalink

      +5

  47. Posted June 3, 2010 at 6:17 pm | Permalink

    That is the only way I can afford a 200mm G VRII. LOL
    But I drink a lot of coffee I need a 500mm mug.

  48. GeorgeofSacramento
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 7:05 pm | Permalink

    But Ken Rockwell prefers a Dixie Cup.

  49. Sqeener
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 7:23 pm | Permalink

    yeah i’m not gonna buy this thing until Ken Rockwell puts up a review and tells me to. I’m being sarcastic. Ken also told me to be sarcastic.

  50. York
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 8:22 pm | Permalink

    I had the Canon 70-200 mug. What I can say is “what a piece of crap” It looks so good in the picture and feel so cheap when you hold it in your hand. Canon may just pay $1 for it… Hope Nikon has the mug build like their camera. I love Nikon but I’m a Canon shooter.