Real Nikon fan

35 Comments

1. Jay
   Posted August 25, 2009 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

   I hope that’s a temporary tat….what if he switches to Canon, or worse….Sony?

   • MW
     Posted August 25, 2009 at 3:52 pm | Permalink

     haha

   • Anonymous
     Posted August 26, 2009 at 9:58 pm | Permalink

     I’m afraid it’s real. Some people are nuts beyond anything a normal brain can picture.

2. John
   Posted August 25, 2009 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

   So… was the original Nikon logo too subtle and too cool?

3. Ennan
   Posted August 25, 2009 at 3:18 pm | Permalink

   craaaaaaaaaaazy!

4. mikeymike
   Posted August 25, 2009 at 3:27 pm | Permalink

   wow what a loser. geezus christ. what an embarassment…

   • Anonymous
     Posted August 25, 2009 at 4:04 pm | Permalink

     Idiot is what I was thinking. That’s way worse than the guy who got the lens diagram of a Pentax tattoo’d on his arm.

     http://pentaxlife.com/fa-77mm-limited-tattoo

     • NikoDoby
       Posted August 25, 2009 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

       Ha Ha I remember that one.

5. lox
   Posted August 25, 2009 at 3:28 pm | Permalink

   I’d call it courage if it said “Pentax”.

   • NikoDoby
     Posted August 25, 2009 at 3:39 pm | Permalink

     LOL, I agree

6. NikoDoby
   Posted August 25, 2009 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

   For a second I thought that was the second giveaway prize.

   • NikoDoby
     Posted August 25, 2009 at 3:38 pm | Permalink

     Admin that’s not your arm is it?!

     • [NR] admin
       Posted August 25, 2009 at 4:44 pm | Permalink

       mine says Nikon Rumors….

       • Dweeb
         Posted August 25, 2009 at 9:40 pm | Permalink

         Same place?

7. Alex
   Posted August 25, 2009 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

   Too quiet in the Nikon world lately…. Come on!! D700x!!!!!!!!!!!

   • Anonymous
     Posted August 25, 2009 at 5:38 pm | Permalink

     and 1.4 AF-s primes!!!

     • jcvjcvjcvjcv
       Posted August 26, 2009 at 3:46 am | Permalink

       But then with fast AF instead of the half-baken AF the 50 has

8. Monsieur T
   Posted August 25, 2009 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

   If I where to do that I’d let nikon pay me bigtime

9. GingerJimmy
   Posted August 25, 2009 at 4:23 pm | Permalink

   and i thought this was bad http://zajebiscireporterzy.wordpress.com/index.php?s=trix

   • Bob Jobson
     Posted August 26, 2009 at 7:02 am | Permalink

     that IS bad

10. Pflip
    Posted August 25, 2009 at 4:23 pm | Permalink

    No one has mentioned ***FUGLY!!!!***??? Photographers generally have better design sense than THAT. Hideous.

11. GeorgeofSacramento
    Posted August 25, 2009 at 4:27 pm | Permalink

    I get it. He’s got a clever plan to extort $$$$$ from Nikon to have the tattoo removed! At least he didn’t tattoo “CANNON”.

12. iHateCanon
    Posted August 25, 2009 at 4:31 pm | Permalink

    I’m curious.. WHY IS EVERYONE RATING ” DO NOT POST AGAIN ” I MEAN COME ON ! ARE YOU SERIOUS !!! THIS IS AWESOME !

13. Simon
    Posted August 25, 2009 at 5:02 pm | Permalink

    Hope he only shoots wide angles….. No way that arm can hold a 400mm

14. paulo
    Posted August 25, 2009 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    hahahaha I almost did the nikon logo (the real at the heart of the image one) on me.
    But to almost get to that it included a bottle of patron.
    I passed out when I sit on the chair and the guy could not tattoo me without my permission hahahahahaha

15. Zorro
    Posted August 25, 2009 at 6:54 pm | Permalink

    Lucky he’s not a Minolta fan.

16. low
    Posted August 25, 2009 at 8:29 pm | Permalink

    i think thats Thom Hogan’s arm.

    • low
      Posted August 25, 2009 at 9:07 pm | Permalink

      i mean how else would he know what nikon will release unless you show them your loyalty..;-) heheheh i keeed!!

17. jcvjcvjcvjcv
    Posted August 26, 2009 at 3:48 am | Permalink

    Why would you get a tattoo at all? I hate them. Why modify your body and inject paint?

18. jon
    Posted August 26, 2009 at 8:46 am | Permalink

    fantastic

19. Nige
    Posted August 26, 2009 at 10:08 am | Permalink

    Good job he doesn’t have a Hasselblad – or even worse, a camera made by Krasnogorsky Mekanicheski Zavod… that would sting a bit.

20. Anonymous
    Posted August 26, 2009 at 11:39 am | Permalink

    This is a big pet peeve of mine so I will keep my rant short…..I don’t even like logos on clothing let alone a logo tattoo…. not too sure why people do this? Is it to feel accepted, important or what?…..So this says you are a photographer and you shoot Nikon!!??….. basically you are advertising for free and looking like a very shallow personin the process…. nothing cool about it…sorry….

21. Anonymous
    Posted August 26, 2009 at 12:47 pm | Permalink

    I think he used that tatoo to cover up a unicorn tatoo

22. Peachfuzz
    Posted August 26, 2009 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    Hope TatBoy doesn’t have to have a MIR anytime in the future. The metal in the ink reacts harshly to the strong magnetic field.

    Think pain…lots and lots of…pain

    • Anonymous
      Posted August 26, 2009 at 9:57 pm | Permalink

      What’s a MIR? Ah well..