Another Nikon D700 picture

15 Comments

1. Renato Pedrosa
   Posted June 25, 2008 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

   Looks fake. The whole right side has signs of PS, top too. At least now it’s a prime FF lens (105mm).

2. Renato Pedrosa
   Posted June 25, 2008 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

   7 on logo should be this one:

   http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3184/2612773693_9ccc1e1cde_o.jpg

   (Called attention to by Thomas Comerford at DPr)

3. freddyc
   Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

   These really are getting worse. All you “Real” voters need to look a bit closer. And all you fakers you really must try harder – changing the 3 to a 7 and sticking a couple of blobs on the side just isn’t good enough – where are all you PS artists, come on show us what you can do and keep us entertained until some real pictures are out there!!

4. Mozart
   Posted June 25, 2008 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

   Hi guys!

   I know that the sales offices personal for Nikon in Sweden were called into the main Nikon office today to get product updates information from Nikon head quarters. It is unknown what kind of product updates this is about but I think we will know more in the comming days if this includes any new SLRs.

5. fotomik
   Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:12 pm | Permalink

   Hmm. That VF DOES look like the real thing should look like, on the baackside that is. I was hoping for a D3-style VF-covering, but that would kill the chance for a built-in flash.

   As to Mozart’s comment, I just realized that our head of staff took a day off today… I wonder where went?

6. ABMann
   Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:34 pm | Permalink

   They didn’t do a very good job cleaning up the 700 in the strap. I can see blotches and blurry edges.

7. Dan
   Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:12 pm | Permalink

   people is stupid for sure.

   we have tom’s predictions, spy pictures, camera websites with pre-sale D700 and people still calling FAKE?

   it’s REAL!!!

8. orion84
   Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:23 pm | Permalink

   According to the Exif data it is shot with an Canon PowerShot SD700 IS (Ixus 800 IS, for us Europeans). Which is not the most recent camera, but even that can deliver way better quality images than this. Apart from all the other signs that have already been mentioned, this even more makes me say this is fake. Seems the crappy quality is there only for covering op traces of PhotoShop editing.

9. Ryan
   Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:44 pm | Permalink

   I don’t think anyone is saying the camera is fake, they’re just saying this photo is fake.

   The only plausibly legit photos were the original advertising photos taken with a cell phone. This one above is fake.

10. Mike
    Posted June 27, 2008 at 9:46 pm | Permalink

    Thats a d200 foo, you noobs have to look a little bit closer, lol.

11. loqhrkec
    Posted August 20, 2008 at 6:57 am | Permalink

    loqhrkec

    loqhrkec

12. loqhrkec
    Posted August 20, 2008 at 6:58 am | Permalink

    loqhrkec

    loqhrkec

13. ikuegasv
    Posted August 20, 2008 at 7:06 am | Permalink

    sfywmytg“>http://wqkdcryl.com“>sfywmytg rodutzfv http://ykvdwamf.com atfeuxlj frzkfcmu [URL=http://blgspalt.comermwyxkt/URL]

14. Christina aguilera lyrics stripped.
    Posted September 15, 2008 at 9:47 pm | Permalink

    Christina aguilera.

    Christina aguilera fantasy pics. Christina aguilera donald duck. Christina aguilera tickets. Christina aguilera lyrics.

15. Jessica alba new movie trailers.
    Posted September 28, 2008 at 9:50 pm | Permalink

    Jessica alba breast.

    Jessica alba.