Now that's just rude gentoo, i wasent trying to correct you in any way.
And im just handing out my opinion, you do know what that is right?.
As for the book etc. the whole point was indeed to at least make people learn something about their subject, i did say "something", i don't care how they learn it, but it is a good idea init.
the whole 300/f4 part, i was agreeing with you,not correcting you? or maybe i am on drugs?.
Now, you saying shooting burst is rubbish? perhaps you believe that, but it still increases your chance of getting "The Shot" in my "O P I N I O N", i didn't say to shoot like a machine gun for all the time your out there, but every time you shoot, taking 3-5 pictures can't harm anyone, its so easy to delete all the unwanted ones.
Especially if your new at photographing, shooting bursts may help you, i thought this thread was to help new people?.
Soap was correct in the 600mm lens part.
I never said you couldn't hand hold, i just said i thought using tripods was better, i believe in using tripods.
the reason i said "wrong" is sure you can hand hold it, but for how long at a time? i don't know about you, but id rather have it steady on a tripod.
Also, im handicapped, i can't turn my palms up so i can have the lens "resting" in my hand as i hand hold, proberly explains my tripod fetish?.
"[I would say that a 300F4 would be the minimum]" "Scroll up and read again. What's with this forum and people not reading carefully then misquoting, then disagreeing with something you never said in the first place?"
I was mentioning the 300/4 as a good lens, so i don't get this reply from you?.
If you're that easy to upset ill try not to say my opinion anymore?. jesus
im deeply truely sorry that i even bothered trying to help people, i won't reply anymore so you can be satisfied.
Nice shot you have there, but ill be slaughtered just for saying that right?.