Would You Want A Nikon DSLR With Built-In Wi-Fi? « Nikon Rumors Forum

The new Nikon Rumors Forum is now live at http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussions. This forum is now in "read only" mode until I figure a proper way to import all data over to the new platform. Please register over at the new forum.


Nikon Rumors Forum

where there’s smoke there’s forum fire

Register or log in - lost password?

Nikon Rumors Forum » Nikon DSLR

Would You Want A Nikon DSLR With Built-In Wi-Fi?

(34 posts) (14 voices)
  • Started 3 years ago by NikoDoby
  • Latest reply from alphanikonrex
  • Related Topics:
    1. DIY Long range WiFi for Nikon for $200!!!
    2. Iphone App to use GPS info on a Nikon DSLR
    3. How much for Nikonos IV?
    4. Nikon 50mm 1.4 G or Sigma 50mm 1.4 HSM- Reviews/Pros-Cons
    5. Nikkor 18-200mm 3.5-5.6 Won't Autofocus

Tags:

  • Nikon
  • Why not bluetooth adapter for GPS
  • Wi-Fi
  • Wireless
« Previous12
  1. alphanikonrex

    I'm under 18!
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,999

    offline

    soap said:
    Exactly as if you were connected via the serial/accessory (10 pin) port. I have a buddy with one of these, it's slick.
    http://www.aokatec.com/Product.html

    Yeah, that's pretty awesome! Any other stuff you can do with the bluetooth—wireless camera control per chance?

    Posted 3 years ago #
  2. NikoDoby

    The Terminator
    Joined: May '09
    Posts: 6,598

    offline

    I'd still want it internally along with a digital compass like the new point & shoot Sony HX5V!

    Posted 3 years ago #
  3. PB PM

    preferred member
    Joined: Jan '10
    Posts: 2,217

    offline

    I don't have any need for WiFi in my cameras, I'd rather have GPS built in.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  4. Panamon_Creel

    senior member
    Joined: Jun '09
    Posts: 95

    offline

    WiFi, sure why not. Like Adam would like to have it with the ability to control the camera remotely, hate running long USB cables.
    Integrated GPS okay too but I have a BT solution right now (foolography)so not so much in a hurry for it.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  5. alphanikonrex

    I'm under 18!
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,999

    offline

    PB PM said:
    I don't have any need for WiFi in my cameras, I'd rather have GPS built in.

    Actually, with WiFi and the proper firmware, couldn't you properly have a GPS similar to the EyeFi SD card?

    Posted 3 years ago #
  6. soap

    preferred member
    Joined: Jul '09
    Posts: 606

    offline

    alphanikonrex said:
    Actually, with WiFi and the proper firmware, couldn't you properly have a GPS similar to the EyeFi SD card?

    Please expand this thought. I'm not sure at all where you're going with this.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  7. alphanikonrex

    I'm under 18!
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,999

    offline

    soap said:
    Please expand this thought. I'm not sure at all where you're going with this.

    I'm just saying if we have built-in GPS, all we have is built-in GPS. However, if we put in WiFi, we not only have the usual advantages of WiFi (like wireless data transfer) but can also integrate a GPS like the GPS of the Eye-Fi SD Card system.

    EDIT: More specifically this link.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  8. soap

    preferred member
    Joined: Jul '09
    Posts: 606

    offline

    alphanikonrex said:
    I'm just saying if we have built-in GPS, all we have is built-in GPS. However, if we put in WiFi, we not only have the usual advantages of WiFi (like wireless data transfer) but can also integrate a GPS like the GPS of the Eye-Fi SD Card system.

    EDIT: More specifically this link.

    That's not GPS, and they go to great lengths to not say GPS. That's a Geotagging routine which notes what Wi-Fi access points are visible at the time a photo was taken. It then, after the fact, compares the list of found access points to Skyhook Wireless's http://www.skyhookwireless.com/ proprietary database and gives you a rough position.

    Problems:
    1 - Only works when you are in range of a broadcasting Wi-Fi access point (doesn't have to be an open AP nor do you need to be connected to it).
    1b - Only when said AP has been mapped by Skyhook Wireless.
    2 - Only accurate to a resolution dependent on the range of said Wi-Fi access point.
    3 - Depends on access to Skyhook Wireless's subscription database (free access with Eye-Fi Geo/Explore/Pro cards) which is a paid service.
    4 - Nikon Wi-Fi solution would need to implement the recording of the above mentioned data.
    5 - (nitpick) need access to internet to geotag.
    6 - (nitpick 2) must use their software and pray they update it for your new OS version. (Windows users likely need not worry).
    7 - (Not a nitpick) - Only works where Skyhook Wireless has mapped APs. That means (according to Eye-Fi's docs) 70% of the population of the USA. This level of coverage would make ATT's 3G coverage look large. ;) (Mind that this uses Skyhook's WPS service, not their totally different XPS service which is a neat variation on AGPS ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assisted_GPS ) using Wi-Fi points as hinting tools)

    Posted 3 years ago #
  9. alphanikonrex

    I'm under 18!
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,999

    offline

    Excuse me for calling it GPS, you're right, it's not. I just call it that. Nobody knows what WPS is anyway.

    Fine, it has its problems, but at least you would kind of have a "two in one" deal. But come to think of it I don't think it's worth the trouble.

    Posted 3 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

« Previous12

Reply

You must log in to post.

NikonRumors Forum (http://nikonrumors.com/forum) is proudly powered by bbPress
Disclaimer: This site has no affiliation with Nikon USA or any other subsidiary of Nikon. Please visit the official Nikon website at nikon.com
Copyright © 2008-2011 NikonRumors.com