bjrichus said:
...As Fujikon already exists, is Nifuji rude in Japanese?
How would you pronounce that? Knee-Foo-Gee? Nigh-Fudgee?
A funny thing, but Ni-Fu-Ji could be "2-2-2" in Japanese.
[closed]
Upcoming Nikon Announcement on April 19th
(33 posts) (17 voices)-
Posted 1 year ago #
-
Wataru said:
How would you pronounce that? Knee-Foo-Gee? Nigh-Fudgee?A funny thing, but Ni-Fu-Ji could be "2-2-2" in Japanese.
It's all a big conspiracy .... 222MP in an evil camera? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA....
Actually, as for Nifudji, I was thinking a good pack of sticky fudge to chew on.
:)
Posted 1 year ago # -
Hmmm...don't need a D3200 or the 28 F1.8 :(
/Starts chanting We want other lenses and a D400, We want other lenses and a D400, We want other lenses and a D400
Posted 1 year ago # -
tcole1983 said:
Hmmm...don't need a D3200 or the 28 F1.8 :(/Starts chanting We want other lenses and a D400, We want other lenses and a D400, We want other lenses and a D400
We want other lenses and a D400, We want other lenses and a D400, We want other lenses and a D400
We want other lenses and a D400, We want other lenses and a D400, We want other lenses and a D400
We want other lenses and a D400, We want other lenses and a D400, We want other lenses and a D400Posted 1 year ago # -
It sounds like a neat camera, but for anyone that already owns a dslr there isn't much appeal to the d3200.
The 28 f1.8 might be neat, but doesn't find any use in my kit. I rarely shoot at that focal length...although I know it is fx and probably makes a little more sense there. Wonder why it wasn't a 24 f1.8 though?
I like the f1.8 lenses, but I was really hoping we would see an update of some of the much needed older versions of lenses. We haven't seen an updated zoom in a long time now and so many old lenses could use af-s and vr. They must hate telephoto/super telephoto focal lengths :-( the 18-200 focal length is saturated with zooms and primes.
Posted 1 year ago # -
tcole1983 said:
The 28 f1.8 might be neat, but doesn't find any use in my kit. I rarely shoot at that focal length...although I know it is fx and probably makes a little more sense there. Wonder why it wasn't a 24 f1.8 though?
. They must hate telephoto/super telephoto focal lengths20mm f/1.8G.... Re: Super telephotos..... too much $$$ is my guess.... unless a 600mm f/5.6G???? Let's see, 1.4 x 600 = 840mm. Oh, not much different than 400 x 2 = 800. Oh well....
I would like the 20mm though... the f/2.8 needs updating.
Posted 1 year ago # -
The new 28mm 1.8G might be worth a go for DX shooters?
It's not all that expensive either...
Posted 1 year ago # -
closing this as there are already d3200 and 28/1.8 topics
Posted 1 year ago #
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.
