d7000 telephoto lens advice « Nikon Rumors Forum

The new Nikon Rumors Forum is now live at http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussions. This forum is now in "read only" mode until I figure a proper way to import all data over to the new platform. Please register over at the new forum.


Nikon Rumors Forum

where there’s smoke there’s forum fire

Register or log in - lost password?

Nikon Rumors Forum » Nikon DSLR » [D7000]

d7000 telephoto lens advice

(78 posts) (19 voices)
  • Started 1 year ago by greeper
  • Latest reply from tcole1983
  • Related Topics:
    1. Probably going to go for the D7000, but I need advice on lens (specifics inside)
    2. Nikon D7000 with lens buying
    3. I'm new here, I need your help. Which lens is good for D7000?
    4. D7000 highest per sq mm Nikon camera ever. Lens issues
    5. 16-85 DX ED VR - Worth buying today?

Tags:

  • blog
  • christian louboutin outlet
  • D7000
  • lens
  • wide angle lens
« Previous1…34
  1. The Man From Mandrem

    preferred member
    Joined: Aug '10
    Posts: 151

    offline

    I'm not sure I understand the strong prejudice about cropping in this forum. People here don't get offended by bumping ISO as high as 3200 (which I think was suggested by others) but cropping is a big deal. I have D7000 and I am much more willing to crop images than bump the ISO that high. I seem to be losing quite a bit of sharpness with 1600 -> 3200 ISO on the D7000; In contrast, I can crop a tremendous amount so long as the initial image is very sharp (good lens, subjects in focus, HIGH shutter speed, a monopod if needed). I DO think the 70-300 VR is an amazing option, but am surprised by the overwhelming view that cropping is a deviant act. -- I think the high megapixel count of the D7000 sensor is far more forgiving than the supposedly stellar high ISO and most good Nikon lenses seem to keep up with the D7000 sensor. I only use the ISO that high if I have no other option and resign myself to a tradeoff in image quality.

    Another option that didn't get mentioned above is the 180AF-ED/2.8. I have one and the images that lens produces are amazing (especially on slide film). It's cheap ($400 cheapest on eBay, got mine for $450), light weight, and truly stellar images. However, not get you as close (and people here hate croppers), hunts in low light, not as good AF, so I would recommend the 70-300 over it.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  2. DaveyJ

    preferred member
    Joined: Jun '10
    Posts: 452

    offline

    @The Man from Mandrem: I agree that cropping is required at times. When photographing wildlife I find I often crop as even with a 70-300VR I am not as close as I would like. I do not myself shot ISO much above 1250 for any purpose but did a LOT of testing and use 640 almost all the time and bump to 800 when I need it.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  3. tcole1983

    preferred member
    Joined: Feb '10
    Posts: 1,553

    offline

    The Man From Mandrem said:
    I'm not sure I understand the strong prejudice about cropping in this forum. People here don't get offended by bumping ISO as high as 3200 (which I think was suggested by others) but cropping is a big deal. I have D7000 and I am much more willing to crop images than bump the ISO that high. I seem to be losing quite a bit of sharpness with 1600 -> 3200 ISO on the D7000; In contrast, I can crop a tremendous amount so long as the initial image is very sharp (good lens, subjects in focus, HIGH shutter speed, a monopod if needed). I DO think the 70-300 VR is an amazing option, but am surprised by the overwhelming view that cropping is a deviant act. -- I think the high megapixel count of the D7000 sensor is far more forgiving than the supposedly stellar high ISO and most good Nikon lenses seem to keep up with the D7000 sensor. I only use the ISO that high if I have no other option and resign myself to a tradeoff in image quality.

    Another option that didn't get mentioned above is the 180AF-ED/2.8. I have one and the images that lens produces are amazing (especially on slide film). It's cheap ($400 cheapest on eBay, got mine for $450), light weight, and truly stellar images. However, not get you as close (and people here hate croppers), hunts in low light, not as good AF, so I would recommend the 70-300 over it.

    The main different is one is avoidable and one isn't. If you are in a low light situation you have no choice but to raise the ISO. If you can't use a flash there is no other option to get the picture...even the fastest lenses won't work in very low light situations. For cropping there is equipment that can hold this to a minimum. You can get closer if possible, you can buy a longer lens or if you already have a lens you can get a teleconverter. People crop pictures, but my biggest gripe is buying a short lens with the intention of cropping all the pictures. Its like buying a econo car to take to a race. You know it is never going to do what you want it to do, but you still bought it and keep taking it there. I know everyone isn't made of money and donaldejose suggest the cropping as a no cost option, but they make the 70-300 or the 300 F4 for a reason. With all the money that people dump into having the newest and best bodies and then don't want to spend the money on the proper equipment to go along with them...it just seems weird and pointless to me.

    Posted 1 year ago #

RSS feed for this topic

« Previous1…34

Reply

You must log in to post.

NikonRumors Forum (http://nikonrumors.com/forum) is proudly powered by bbPress
Disclaimer: This site has no affiliation with Nikon USA or any other subsidiary of Nikon. Please visit the official Nikon website at nikon.com
Copyright © 2008-2011 NikonRumors.com