Decisions, Decisions, Decisions « Nikon Rumors Forum

The new Nikon Rumors Forum is now live at http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussions. This forum is now in "read only" mode until I figure a proper way to import all data over to the new platform. Please register over at the new forum.


Nikon Rumors Forum

where there’s smoke there’s forum fire

Register or log in - lost password?

Nikon Rumors Forum » Nikon DSLR

Decisions, Decisions, Decisions

(34 posts) (18 voices)
  • Started 1 year ago by caitsweet94
  • Latest reply from donaldejose
  • Related Topics:
    1. D7000 vs D5200 vs D5100 runout
    2. Moving from D5100 -> D7000 (7100 coming soon?)
    3. upgrade to d7000 or wait until the d7100?
    4. I want to upgrade from D5100 any advice?
    5. Which Way to Go for Video

Tags:

  • D5100
  • d700 vs d300s
  • D7000
  • ugg boots
12Next »
  1. caitsweet94

    junior member
    Joined: Nov '11
    Posts: 8

    offline

    Hi all,
    I've read through some of the fantastic advice you've given out to others, so I felt compelled to join up to get some great advice for myself :-)
    So, I'm finally in the market for my (own) first DSLR, after years of borrowing other peoples!! I've been shooting with mid-level DSLRs (both Canon & Nikon) for the past 3 or so years, and have finally saved up enough to get one of my own which is both very exciting and daunting, especially because it is quite a big financial decision...
    Having previous photography experience I am looking at buying either the D5100 or D7000, and therein lies my dilemma - spend the extra $600 or so for the D7000 or not?!
    This will be a pretty long term camera for me, I am hoping to use it for the next 5 or so years, and I am concerned whether I might 'outgrow' the D5100 and yearn for the more advanced D7000.
    I am anticipating that my main uses will be: Vacation/Day trip photos, Informal portraits (senior portrait type stuff), and a small bit of artistic photography.
    This leads to all sorts of questions about whether the extra weight of the D7000 will be inconvenient to carry around all day, and if the D5100 will be a little too slow to capture those spontaneous vacation snaps...
    Any advice you can spare is greatly appreciated :-)
    Cheers,
    Cait

    EDIT: I should also mention I'm not particularly interested in the video capabilities, I'm a still-shooting girl!
    It'd be great too if some of you could share your experience of travelling with DSLRs, do you find it tricky at all? Any troubles with airport security and the like?

    Posted 1 year ago #
  2. El_Pickerel

    preferred member
    Joined: Jul '11
    Posts: 581

    offline

    Before Niko shuts this down, check out this thread or any of the 1057 other D5100 vs. D7000 threads: http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4357

    Posted 1 year ago #
  3. caitsweet94

    junior member
    Joined: Nov '11
    Posts: 8

    offline

    Thanks El_Pickerel, but I already read through quite a few of the D5100 vs D7000 articles, and I didn't really find what I was looking for.
    Most people are discussing the topic in terms of price and features. I have thoroughly researched these cameras and am aware of their capabilities, so I am more interested in hearing from owners of either or both - how do they use their camera everyday? is it heavy hanging around their neck if they take a day trip? What kind of lenses have they invested in?
    Cait

    Posted 1 year ago #
  4. donaldejose

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '11
    Posts: 1,043

    offline

    You have seen my advice in the other D5100 vs. D7000 thread. The D5100 with a 18-55 lens will be light and well suited to vacation, close up and portraits. As I said there, the D5100 plus three lenses is all you really need. That combo should do all you want to do. However, I will give slightly different advice here which also could apply to the person who started the other thread.

    This is "the other side of the coin" for someone who has been shooting "mid-level" DSLRs for years and plans to keep a camera for a long time and sees themselves as an advanced amateur who will become very serious about photography. Get the D7000. It is the best, most technically advanced all around Nikon body now on the market. Yes, the FX D3s is much better if you are a professional sports photographer but you are not. Yes, the D3x is much better if your are a professional landscape photographer but you are not. Yes, the D700 (and very soon D800) is much better if you are a professional all around photographer, but you are not. Plus, all of those will be costing you $3,000 to $8,000 for the body alone without any lenses and you are not in that monetary league. Plus, you will not want to haul this heavy gear around on vacations. Therefor, the D7000 is the best, most advanced, reasonably priced, reasonably sized, uses reasonably priced lenses, etc. for most people who are not making their living from photography but who fancy themselves advanced photographers.

    Now what lenses to match to your D7000 body (about $1,400)? I recommend starting with just two: a 18-200 DX VR (about $850)and a 35mm 1.8 or a 50mm 1.8 (each about $200). If you find the 18-200 too heavy for vacation travel you may want to add a light 18-55 (about $150) and it may be all you really need for that use. Add a SB600 flash (about $650).

    When you add up all this cost and compare it to the cost for the D5100 package I recommended in the other thread you will find that you are spending about twice as much money and carrying around about twice as much weight. Will this gear take twice as good photos? No. The photos will be indistinguishable. What do you get for double the price? More robust gear, more flash options (you can use the D7000 pop-up flash to command the SB600 when the SB600 is placed off to the side and is not mounted on the camera), quicker zoom range response time (you can use the full 18-200 range without stopping to change lenses), quicker shutter release response time (my D7000/18-200/plus battery pack) snaps that shutter with more authority and less delay than my D5100/18-55). Basically, you are paying for a stronger and quicker responding and more versatile system. You will be able to miss less shots and you will be able to use a few additional features. There is no question that these advantages are will worth the increased price to a professional who just has to get the best shots to please his or her client. But, of course your family is not so demanding and you are not competing with anyone for their business.

    Which system is for you? Well, how much do you have to spend and just how "advanced" do you fancy yourself? You will be your own worst critic, not your family. Just how much are you going to expect of yourself? Will the ability to bounce a SB600 off an umbrella mounted on a light stand to produce senior type portrait lighting be an essential element of what you expect of your gear? If you want your camera to be able to do that you will want the D7000/SB600 combo instead of the D5100/SB400 combo. The D5100 can take nice senior type portraits in available light and with the SB400 bounced off the ceiling but it will not be able to use the flash on the side wirelessly controlled by the pop-up flash on the camera (but you can get close to the same side lighting effect by holding the D5100 vertical and bouncing the SB400 off a white wall instead of off a white ceiling). As a practical matter, the weight of the D5100/18-55 is a joy to carry around your neck all day. I take it when I know it will do all I want to do that day. The D7000/18-200/battery pack is much heavier. I take it when I don't want any delay in getting a shot but I carry it in a bag or a pack and not around my neck all day.

    Now what if you are a professional photographer? Then this thread isn't relevant to you and you don't need anyone's advice because you already know your needs and what system you want to meet those needs. The D7000 is your "minimum" desired camera and you really want a D400 or a D800 or a D4 (none of which are yet on the market but all probably will be for sale by next summer - so if you are a professional the real advice to you is just wait six months and you will have much better choices).

    Posted 1 year ago #
  5. tcole1983

    preferred member
    Joined: Feb '10
    Posts: 1,553

    offline

    I think any dSLR is a pain to carry all day. I opted to carry my wife's P&S most days while we were at Disney World just for this reason. Even my D5000 with a lighter lens I wouldn't want hanging around my neck all day. So if you want a lighter camera then the D5100 is the obvious choice, but will it make a noticeable difference...probably not. I would suggest a better strap and there are topics on here about that.

    Now the comment on the D5100 being too slow...I am not sure what you mean by this. The camera is basically on as soon as you flip the switch on...so start up isn't an issue for any Nikon dSLR and I don't think you will see a difference in any body for this. As for shooting speed the D5100 shoots 4 fps...which is fast enough for just about anything. I have never missed a shot because my camera (D5000) was too slow in any way. The only slowness I can think of would be using slow lenses (not body related), either slow focusing or slow as in not a low F-stops...anything slower than F2.8. I have shot everything from top fuel dragsters to a bald eagle in flight at 200mm with my D5000.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  6. donaldejose

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '11
    Posts: 1,043

    offline

    The slowness I am referring to is shutter delay. I have not measure it but my subjective impression is that my D5100/18-55 combo has more delay between pressing the shutter release button and the shot occurring and the mirror back down ready for the next shot than does my D7000/18-200/battery pack combo. My D7000 combo seems to snap through the shots with more authority. When do I appreciate this? When I am trying to capture a certain expression or event in time.

    Another way to say it is that I feel there is a quicker response time in the D7000 between you pressing the shutter button and the shot actually being taken and then the camera ready for the next shot.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  7. caitsweet94

    junior member
    Joined: Nov '11
    Posts: 8

    offline

    Thank you very much donaldejose!! That was exactly what I needed :-)
    You have offered up some fantastic advice which has put the two in perspective for me. The camera will actually be my birthday present, so it would be good to get it right!!
    Going off to college next year & hoping to travel a bit more, I am leaning towards the D5100 as a matter of practicality. I am a little wary of carrying around the D7000 and all its components considering their value...and also their extra weight!!
    The faster shutter speed on the D7000 is incredibly appealing because I really love using photography to capture those special moments with my friends & family, but I don't think the extra money really justifies it for me.
    "Will this gear take twice as good photos? No. The photos will be indistinguishable." - This is what I think I will really take away from your post: I have spent so much time doing camera research I have forgotten that I am an important factor in the equation! I will take the same photos with the D5100 and the D7000.
    It's seeming more and more logical to me to start with the D5100 now, and upgrade later since college will be my primary focus for the next 4-5 years, and I will have had more photography experience by then.
    Thanks again for your input, it was most helpful! :-)

    Thanks also to you tcole1983 :-) I will definitely need to check out the thread on camera straps! Hopefully that will make my own visit to Disneyworld less painful...

    Cait

    Posted 1 year ago #
  8. jonnyapple

    Goldfingers
    Joined: May '09
    Posts: 3,400

    offline

    You'll love it, caitsweet94. Even the D7000 is not so heavy that you're going to regret carrying it around, so I wouldn't worry about the D5100. I like what I read ;-) of donald's advice. I would add that you should consider the 18-105 also as kind of an all-rounder that's light and a great lens. It's not much different in weight from the 18-55, but it's much more useful IMO.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  9. iris chrome

    preferred member
    Joined: Feb '11
    Posts: 394

    offline

    El_Pickerel said:
    Before Niko shuts this down, check out this thread or any of the 1057 other D5100 vs. D7000 threads: http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4357

    I'm sorry and I don't mean to pry but is Niko on vacation? I think it's been about a month since I've last seen him here. Hope everything is alright with him.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  10. caitsweet94

    junior member
    Joined: Nov '11
    Posts: 8

    offline

    Thanks jonnyapple :-) Lenses are of course always the real stick when it comes to buying cameras, it's like being a kid in a candy store!! I'll definitely keep an open mind about the 18-105mm - it's a lot more versatility in one lens, and it can be a bit of a pain to change lenses if you're out and about, especially somewhere busy.

    Cait

    Posted 1 year ago #
  11. tcole1983

    preferred member
    Joined: Feb '10
    Posts: 1,553

    offline

    donaldejose said:
    The slowness I am referring to is shutter delay. I have not measure it but my subjective impression is that my D5100/18-55 combo has more delay between pressing the shutter release button and the shot occurring and the mirror back down ready for the next shot than does my D7000/18-200/battery pack combo. My D7000 combo seems to snap through the shots with more authority. When do I appreciate this? When I am trying to capture a certain expression or event in time.

    Another way to say it is that I feel there is a quicker response time in the D7000 between you pressing the shutter button and the shot actually being taken and then the camera ready for the next shot.

    /shrug

    Unless the D5100 is that different from the D5000 I don't see this. There is no delay in my D5000 that I have ever noticed. Like I said...I shot a bald eagle in flight and took around 10 shots from the time it got close enough until it was out of range. I didn't have any time to setup and just turned it on and got the camera up as it took off...I think any of the Nikon dSLR cameras out are fast enough. I mean you can shoot around 20 pics in a row at least with my slow memory card without having to wait for the buffer to clear. I think they are all fast enough for everyone but the professional sports photog that wants to shoot someone jumping in the air for a ball or something...even though I think you could still do this with any body you would just get fewer pics and have to time it a little better.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  12. donaldejose

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '11
    Posts: 1,043

    offline

    I wouldn't expect the shutter delay (fractions of a second) of the D5100 to be significantly different than that of a D5000. Both cameras are in the same class. If you just shoot a D5000 or a D5100 you will never know what I am taking about. You have to shoot the D5100 back to back with the D7000 to notice the difference fractions of a second can make. I notice the same thing with my F5 and I am sure I would notice it with all the D3 series (but I don't have any). I do expect that if I shot a D3 back to back with my D7000 I would notice less fractions of seconds delay in the D3 and prefer the speed of the D3. Why is there a difference? More robust motors in the camera body making the lens focus more instantaneously when you are using old AF lenses without motors in the lens, faster mirror up and down, less delay in the shutter button, etc. I don't know all the components which contribute to the sensation you can feel. Things just happen "instantaneously" or more immediately as you move up from the less expensive D3100/D5100 class to the intermediate D7000 class and then on up to the professional D3 class. It is like having three cars, one with the 4 cylinder engine, one with the V6 option and one with the V8 option. All three will get to you 60mph but the increased torque and horsepower of the more powerful engines make a difference in how quickly you get to 60. The more powerful the engine the more "responsive" that car will be. In Nikon DSLRs I am talking small fractions of a second which surprisingly are noticeable. "Robust" is a good word here. When Nikon makes a less expensive camera it puts in parts that work but they are not all the very "top of the line" parts. The shutter won't last as long, the lenses will have plastic parts instead of metal parts, the motors will be weaker, the electronics will be slower, the internal buffer will be smaller, etc. The average person won't notice it until they actually use the two products back to back during the same photo shoot. Its like the car with the engine options. They all look the same sitting there and if you drive only the low, but adequate, power car you don't really miss the higher power engines because you don't know what you are missing. But once you drive them back to back through the same road course you are going to notice the additional power. Do you need it for day to day normal use? No. But are you going to like it? I bet you will. Is fractions of a second more responsiveness worth thousands of dollars more? Not to the normal person; but worth it to the pro. This is not a key consideration, just a difference I note.

    Since the original poster is not yet in college I would amend my advice to him/her and suggest the D5100 outfit. There is no real need or justification to spend the extra thousand dollars at this time in a person's life. The D5100 body and its associated lenses will certainly last until well after graduation when income should significantly increase.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  13. TaoTeJared

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '10
    Posts: 2,422

    offline

    caitsweet94 said:
    ...I am more interested in hearing from owners of either or both - how do they use their camera everyday? is it heavy hanging around their neck if they take a day trip? What kind of lenses have they invested in?

    Cait -

    Everyone here likes to push DSLR (hell that is what we all shoot.) tcole1983 touched on it and I keep noticing your 2 things you keep talking about - size and weight. Add to that you referred to changing lenses is a pain.

    Almost all of my friends who make those statements as concerns who buy DSLRs never use them. It's a shame, but they never take them because they are so "big."

    So your concerns are:
    Size
    Weight
    Easy to travel with (don't want to carry much gear)
    And you are concerned you will outgrow it.
    Last 5- years.

    5 years for a camera is doable, but not realistic. Many of us are on 2-4 year cycles, 2 years for the level of camera you are looking at, and 3-4 years for the "pro" models. If you become really interested in photography, 5 years is "just not going to happen" due to human nature.

    It really doesn't sound like you need or really want a DSLR. I say go with a P7100 or maybe a J1/V1 series. Much easier to use, carry, great image quality, light, small, easy to upgrade from and has all the features that a DSLR has but in a small package.

    You do not need a DSLR for great images (This is a really bad misconception) and if you are only going to get a Kit lens, then there really is not that much difference than just buying a P7100. If you grow into photography, 1-2 years down the line, then upgrading is easy and you still have a great camera to take traveling. And the newer Tech camera that you have learned to utilize.

    Give you an example - I always walk out the door with A camera. 80% Fuji X100 or a G11. Only time I take my DSLR is when I think I will be around something that I know I have been wanting to shoot. Going home for Thanksgiving in a few hours - I just weighed my bag (it's light this time) and it came in at 22lbs. Those are not kit lenses.

    I bought my G11 (P7100 was not out then) for everything you just described you want a DSLR for because, a DSLR is a pain to carry. I use my D300 for when I go out to specifically shoot something and with advanced lighting set-ups. Hell you can actually do most of it with a P7100 as well.

    I'm just being realistic, and remembering my first few years in college, there is not a chance in hell I would have carried a DSLR around. The Key is to have a camera with you. It sounds like you realize the camera phones suck and want something better. I'm just suggesting that you don't need a 3-pound rock hanging from your neck.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  14. donaldejose

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '11
    Posts: 1,043

    offline

    Good comments and suggestions from Tao TeJard.

    I just don't have experience with the upper level non-DSLRs to have an intelligent comment about them. I have only used the lower level Nikon Coolpix compacts and I find their image quality lacking for me. The Canon S95 gets good reviews. And it is now on sale for about $300 at Amazon and Adorama. The Fuji FinePix X100 gets good reviews but it costs about $1,200. The Nikon P7100 ($500) and the Canon G11 ($600) also get good reviews. Search the web for reviews of these cameras and for examples of the photos taken with them. And remember your computer monitor, even at its high definition setting, will be able to display only about 2 megapixels. Photos will be automatically re-sized downward when you call them up to look at them. The file size may say 10 megapixels and you may have 10 megapixels in that file but your computer has to reduce it to about 2 megapixels in order to display it full screen. Your computer won't be changing the file on your hard drive but it will be degrading the image it sends to your monitor for you to see. Once you get above 6 megapixels on the camera's image sensor you won't see any increased sharpness from the additional megapixels you paid for when you view the image on your computer or print it at 11x14. Just how often do you think you will print your photos at 20x30 inches anyway?

    Tao is correct that when you ask for advice here you will be getting biased advice. We are all biased in favor of DSLRs and also in favor of the most professional DSLRs.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  15. sevencrossing

    preferred member
    Joined: Sep '10
    Posts: 1,265

    offline

    The fact you are asking the question, suggests the 5100 should be fine

    but if you are taking up photography seriously, go for the 7000

    I have had my P7100 for about a week and I am still getting used to it

    So far, in Bright light, it is great for landscapes and family type shots (this is what I bought it for)

    it is OK for Sunsets

    it is hopeless for any sort of action

    It seems useless for portraiture ,the shutter delay mean you a miss "the decisive moment", You cannot see the person's expression in ether the optical of LCD view finder

    wide angel, indoor shots, with flash seem fine

    The noise is OK at ISO 100 but quality deteriorated rapidly if you start to crank it up

    that said, I should perhaps explain I am used to a D700

    Posted 1 year ago #
  16. caitsweet94

    junior member
    Joined: Nov '11
    Posts: 8

    offline

    TaoTeJared, I think you might have misunderstood me a bit!
    The predominant reason I worry about size and weight is that I'm quite a small person, so they factor in for me, whereas they might not really for you guys.
    I did explore all options before deciding on a Nikon DSLR (every camera salesman for miles knows me now!!) and quite frankly I don't think point and shoots are really what I want - I feel quite detached from the photos, especially without the viewfinder, and I'd rather manually focus the shots too. Lenses aren't really a problem, -I've been changing lenses for years- but I'm just thinking ahead about travel, because you have to be a bit smarter when you travel so you don't take 5 lenses when 1 or 2 should do.
    Thanks again for your input though :-)

    sevencrossing, the P7100 sounds like a decent little camera then? The noise at relatively low Point and Shoots is a bit of a stickler for me though...
    What is the optical viewfinder like? It looks very small in photos...
    I've already got a perfectly good point and shoot -albeit not as fanciful as this-, but maybe this/its progeny can be its replacement :-)
    Thanks for the info!

    Posted 1 year ago #
  17. Ron

    senior member
    Joined: Sep '10
    Posts: 53

    offline

    I love my D7000 with 18-200 vr and 35 f/1.8. That is what I walk out the door with most of the time and leave the other equipment at home.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  18. flx11e

    new member
    Joined: Nov '11
    Posts: 1

    offline

    May be some helpful info here...
    *LINK REMOVED*

    Posted 1 year ago #
  19. jonnyapple

    Goldfingers
    Joined: May '09
    Posts: 3,400

    offline

    Caitsweet94, have you considered the NEX-5N? I have one and you might be surprised at how well it's set up for manual focus and/or manual exposure. In manual focus you touch the screen to zoom to the area you're interested in—it's a sweet feature, and if you want to get lazy you touch to autofocus—which works during video recording as well. The kit 18-55 lens is very capable and they're (finally!) releasing more lenses for it. They're also releasing an electronic viewfinder for it, but it's a bit pricey. :-(

    On image quality it's not a slouch, either. My feeling is that my D7000 is only slightly better.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  20. golf007sd

    preferred member
    Joined: Nov '10
    Posts: 585

    offline

    TaoTeJared said:

    ...Going home for Thanksgiving in a few hours - I just weighed my bag (it's light this time) and it came in at 22lbs. Those are not kit lenses.

    LMFAO...I know Exactly what you mean my friend!!

    Now to the our new lovely lady caitsweet94: Heading to college and considering getting a DSLR...ooh how fun. I wish I had gotten into photography back in 2006-2008 while I attended SDSU (hence never to late in finishing something you start long time ago...graduated Cum laude too by the way :P). From reading all the great recommendation given so far, and the amount of time you yourself have put in this; hence "every camera salesman for miles knows me now!" I would like to put in my two cents: get the D7000. As for the lens to get: one prime lens is a must have. Nikon has some that are outstanding and priced very aggressively (i.e. the 35/50mm 1.8) and the other an all purpose lens (18-200 VR II) In fact, the 35mm 1.8 and the 18-200mm were the first two lens I bought and still use today. However, if your budget does allow you to reach just a little more, them young lady may I recommend considerate some of the 2.8's: My latest love is the Nikon Micro 105 2.8...boy the things I can see you shooting on campus with this bad boy. The other would be the 24-70mm 2.8...nothing needs to be said about this that I'm sure you don't already know....period!

    As for the D7000, here is why I think it is a good choice for you. The built quality (i.e. weather protection, magnesium body, DUAL memory slots etc, etc) and overall camera functionality, will allow you to hedge towards your time horizon (in your case 5 years) in getting another camera for the years to come. Moreover, if and when you do, the D7000 will make an excellent backup.

    I'm not even worried about the whole weight argument here regarding your physical size...the energy level you have expressed in your writing makes it mute. Just get yourself the Black Rapid R7 and kick ass...if you know what I mean.

    Let us know which way you go and by all means, keep us updated on your progress....cheers :D

    Posted 1 year ago #
  21. sevencrossing

    preferred member
    Joined: Sep '10
    Posts: 1,265

    offline

    caitsweet94 said:
    severncrossing, the P7100 sounds like a decent little camera then?... ...
    What is the optical viewfinder like? It looks very small in photos...

    As you say it is very small. it is useful in bright sunlight when the LCD is difficult to see

    Posted 1 year ago #
  22. NikonMick

    member
    Joined: Jun '11
    Posts: 32

    offline

    Hi Cait,

    In summary, I bought a D7000, played with it overnight, returned the camera the next day, luckily got a full refund and then bought a D3100, which I'm really happy with.

    Want the whole story?

    ;-)

    In March 2009 I traded a black FM3 and black 45mm/P lens, all mint, for a D60 and twin lens kit, 18-55 and 55-200. 



    I'd had Coolpixes since 2000 (990, 995 and 4500s) but I resisted getting a DSLR until finally I sucumbed when I was offered the trade/swap above.



    Was very happy with the D60, but within six months after purchase I'd traded both kit lenses for other, better lenses (DX & FX ) and had also sold two manual focus lenses during the course of my buying and selling.



    When the D7000 was announced about twelve months ago, I was hot to trot and ready to "trade up" to a "better" DSLR, I thought.

    Shortly after the Japanese earthquake earlier this year, I finally committed and traded in my two-year-old D60 for the D7000.



    Like many of us, I'd read the spec sheets for the D7000, followed the reviews, absorbed the discussions and figured that this is the one for me.



    So I got the camera home, did the unboxing, charged the battery and then spent eight hours (7pm-3am) playing with everything and settting up the camera as I thought I may use it.



    Toward the end of the session, around 2.30am, I was feeling dissatisfied, partially with the camera, but mainly with myself and my purchasing decision.

    

Over the two years of owning the D60 I'd become very accustomed to its small form-factor and low weight, I liked having only three focus-points in the D60's screen, and the lack of a front wheel selector hadn't been noticed.



    The D7000 was 300gm heavier than the D60, the menus were unnecessarily convoluted, the thicker body was a concern, and the viewfinder screen real estate was too full of sensors and information, distracting me from the composition.



    So the next morning I returned to the camera store that I deal with, and have also done a lot of secondhand buying and selling over the years. 

I told them of my bad decision, to my mind, about the D7000 purchase and after a brief discussion, they refunded my money in full.

    When I asked if I could have the D60 back, they laughingly said it was out of the store 30 minutes after I traded it in on the D7000.



    I waited two days before making my next decision, thinking i should be less impetuous - and then bought the D3100.



    I am very happy with the D3100 after eight months, it's substantially better then the D60, fits all the DX & FX lenses that I settled on, and is slightly lighter than the D60 was.



    One of the reasons I wanted the D7000 was to use some legacy AI & AIS manual focus lenses with auto exposure that the D7000 provides in the non-CPU lens function. But the histograms of the D3100, and use of the LCD screen to assess exposure works just fine for me.



    So now my only "missing preferences" from both the D60 and the D7000 are these: audio-in socket; wireless remote front and rear: intervalometer; higher rez LCD screen; and maybe the non-CPU lens menu.



    So this is simply a tale of wondering what we really want from our machinery, and how "good" does a body have to be before it's capability is irrelevant to the output we can achieve.

    For me, the smaller form factor of the D40/60/3000/3100 line was/is the main consideration.

    I used Minox 35 film cameras for many years, amongst other devices, and the output from those small cameras was great.

    Michael

    Adelaide AUSTRALIA

    PS: my current lens kit is 35/f1.8 DX, 12-24/f4 DX, 24-85/f3.5-4.5FX and a 1979 28mm/f2 AI manual focus

    Posted 1 year ago #
  23. jonnyapple

    Goldfingers
    Joined: May '09
    Posts: 3,400

    offline

    Consider the new 40 2.8 DX macro, too.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  24. Rx4Photo

    preferred member
    Joined: Oct '10
    Posts: 951

    offline

    Caitsweet94, you've gotten a lot of excellent advice and personal opinions here. As for me, I've never used a D5100 but I must say, I'm in the "get the D7000" boat here. For everything donaldejose, golf007sd, and others have said I think it will give you years of creative capability. Even considering features that you think you might not use, who knows what you might want your camera to do a year from now. I also get the feeling you will NOT be overwhelmed with the feature set.

    The camera is robust, yet light in my opinion. If you stick a f/1.8 Nikon 35mm or 50mm lens on it I think the weight is just about perfect for walking around or evenings out with friends . If you get a zoom for campus life or vacation (e.g. 18-200mm) then you'd have more weight but it's not near as heavy as some of the f2.8 lenses and at least you're prepared for almost any shot you want to take.

    As far as carrying the camera around, I could recommend taking off that stock Nikon neckstrap and replace it with something like golf007sd said, a Black Rapid RS-7 or a Crumpler disgrace. Those straps are longer so that you can sling it over your shoulder and hang the camera on your side much like you'd carry a purse. You could probably walk around all day with a camera like that. Just don't leave it in a restaurant like I did once.

    Airports have been no problem so far although I've only carried my D7000 with several lenses in tow through Miami International, Atlanta Hartsfield, and to the West Indies. Never been asked to open my bag.

    Good luck, have fun.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  25. pbull221

    senior member
    Joined: Jan '11
    Posts: 57

    offline

    Look at the UPStrap. I have one for each of my 3 cameras now. They are designed to sit on your shoulder and DO NOT slide off. Made in the USA, ran a recall for an issue I didn't know existed and sent out a parts replacement after basically clicking a link from my registration that arrived from them in the mail.

    My question about "how big" is one of, how big are you? At 6'1" and 250lbs, the 5100 and even the 7000 dissolve into my hands. The controls are just not that comfortable. Are you 5'3" like my last girlfriend? She would have been fine with the 5100. If I had the $$ it would be a D3s and a 200-400mm zoom w two more lenses in a fanny pack.

    Try them on. Even rent them for a week and try them out. :-)

    Posted 1 year ago #

RSS feed for this topic

12Next »

Reply »

You must log in to post.

NikonRumors Forum (http://nikonrumors.com/forum) is proudly powered by bbPress
Disclaimer: This site has no affiliation with Nikon USA or any other subsidiary of Nikon. Please visit the official Nikon website at nikon.com
Copyright © 2008-2011 NikonRumors.com