Is there any reason why almost everybody here bashes the low light capabilities of the D200? I've got two of them and used them for more than 2 years by now for concert photography and the results are very nice. Of course they are no match against my D700 but in any aspect good enough for using 1600 iso photos to be printed at 75x50cm. A bit of noise reduction will do the trick and let's face it, who would want to print bigger than 75x50cm anyway? I think most people look too much at a pixel per pixel level. If you really need a good camera for low light (and with need I mean really need) get the FX camera's The D200 is perfectly useable at 1600 iso and how many of you all really need that on a regular basis?
For 225$ I'd buy an extra D200 any day :)