Is anyone using Zeiss ZF/ZF.2 lenses or Leica R lenses? « Nikon Rumors Forum

The new Nikon Rumors Forum is now live at http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussions. This forum is now in "read only" mode until I figure a proper way to import all data over to the new platform. Please register over at the new forum.


Nikon Rumors Forum

where there’s smoke there’s forum fire

Register or log in - lost password?

Nikon Rumors Forum » Nikon Lenses

Is anyone using Zeiss ZF/ZF.2 lenses or Leica R lenses?

(30 posts) (13 voices)
  • Started 2 years ago by TaoTeJared
  • Latest reply from bossa
  • Related Topics:
    1. fashion film shot using Nikkor macro lenses on RED Epic Camera
    2. AF mode setting for using manual lenses
    3. Anyone using this Wide Angle Lens?
    4. Anyone using Video Glasses to replace viewfinder/Display ?
    5. Is anyone else worried about lenses from Japan?

Tags:

  • Leica R
  • Zeiss ZF
  • Zeiss ZF.2
« Previous12
  1. Godless

    preferred member
    Joined: Oct '10
    Posts: 241

    offline

    TaoTeJared said:
    Has anyone tested/compared Nikon counterparts? Or even seen any good reviews that do this?

    Check out Photozone.de and Lenstip too. They have reviewed the Zeiss ZF range.

    Posted 11 months ago #
  2. Beso

    newbie
    Joined: Mar '12
    Posts: 171

    offline

    I am currently debating whether to purchase the Nikkor AF-S 85mm f/1.4G or the Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 100mm f/2 ZF.2. Since the purpose is primary as a portrait lens the manual focus on the Zeiss is not an issue for me. The reviews on both are very, very good with a slight edge perhaps going to Zeiss for bokeh and the intangibles of color and warmth. One local shop tells me the Zeiss is very good but parts and service are difficult. He suggests sticking with Nikon (but he sells Nikon and not Zeiss). I would like to hear from others with experience regarding these two lenses and also service related comments. The cost difference is only about $150 between the Nikon and Zeiss and at this level that is really pretty minimal.

    Posted 11 months ago #
  3. TaoTeJared

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '10
    Posts: 2,422

    offline

    Godless said:
    Check out Photozone.de and Lenstip too. They have reviewed the Zeiss ZF range.

    I have looked there - their tests are too generic for what I look for in a portrait lens. Zeiss have a look, some say 3d. The Nikkor does as well, to a point. As Beso put, the intangibles are what I look at. At the price for the Zeiss, it doesn't mean much for me - I want the VR & macro of the Nikkor so it's not going to go anywhere.

    Posted 11 months ago #
  4. msmoto

    big gun cougar
    Joined: Mar '10
    Posts: 2,736

    offline

    To ask a question regarding the Zeiss Distagon T* 28mm f/2.0 Lens with ZF.2 Mount for Nikon F vs. the Nikkor 28mm f/1.8 and the 24mm f/1.4. Some opinions regarding the overall performance and experience is appreciated.

    My thoughts are this is a nice prime, either on a DX (D400 if it gets here) and FX. Also, I was thinking of using it on a Fujifilm X-E1 with a Novoflex adapter.

    And, your help is appreciated. I do know the test of the Zeiss lens shows it is very sharp.

    Posted 8 months ago #
  5. bossa

    senior member
    Joined: Jun '12
    Posts: 63

    offline

    I love my Zeiss 21/2.8
    DSC_6097.jpg

    Posted 7 months ago #

RSS feed for this topic

« Previous12

Reply

You must log in to post.

NikonRumors Forum (http://nikonrumors.com/forum) is proudly powered by bbPress
Disclaimer: This site has no affiliation with Nikon USA or any other subsidiary of Nikon. Please visit the official Nikon website at nikon.com
Copyright © 2008-2011 NikonRumors.com