80-200 AF-D + 1.4 Teleconverter or 70-300 VR? « Nikon Rumors Forum

The new Nikon Rumors Forum is now live at http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussions. This forum is now in "read only" mode until I figure a proper way to import all data over to the new platform. Please register over at the new forum.


Nikon Rumors Forum

where there’s smoke there’s forum fire

Register or log in - lost password?

Nikon Rumors Forum » Nikon Lenses

80-200 AF-D + 1.4 Teleconverter or 70-300 VR?

(9 posts) (8 voices)
  • Started 2 years ago by Peppermint15
  • Latest reply from TheCaz
  • Related Topics:
    1. Teleconverters - 1.7III?
    2. Price on Nikon 80-200mm Af-D ?
    3. What determines teleconverter compatibility?
    4. Teleconverter for AF-D/ Screw-type focus lenses
    5. Diffraction and effective aperture while shooting macro / teleconverters

Tags:

  • Nikon 70-300
  • nikon 80-200
  • teleconverters
  • Tokina 80-400
  1. Peppermint15

    new member
    Joined: Mar '11
    Posts: 3

    offline

    What would produce better images on a D700?

    -Nikon 80-200 f2.8 AF-D with a Kenko 1.4x teleconverter (equiv. of 112-280mm)
    -Nikon 70-300 VR
    -Tokina 80-400 (can't afford and really don't want the Nikon version)

    I mostly need the 200-400 end, and I'm shooting outdoors during the day. I already own the 80-200 which is a very good quality lens, but I need more zoom. I'm also considering using the DX crop mode. My budget is $500 max.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  2. Krevlin

    preferred member
    Joined: Jun '10
    Posts: 316

    offline

    If I were you I'd look into getting a Kenko 1.7x or 2x

    I use to own the Tokina and while I liked it's build quality and it's optical quality I absolutely hated how slow the AF was on my D90 and that I could not really use it in anything but bright sunlight outdoors.

    Also the focal lengths would overlap so you'd basically be stuck with a 300-400 that goes from f/5.2 to f/5.6.

    The 2XTC + 80-200 combo would be the best because you get the 400mm @ f/5.6 and the aperture values along the focal length will be better compared to the other lenses as well as you can always remove the TC and get f/2.8 where the others will always start at f/4.5

    Posted 2 years ago #
  3. JeramPhotography

    new member
    Joined: Mar '11
    Posts: 1

    offline

    I dont know about the TC but the 80-200 is a great lens. Nothing beats F2.8 @200.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  4. Drdobs

    senior member
    Joined: Feb '11
    Posts: 63

    offline

    This may sway your decision - 70-300 Refurb for $349.95
    http://www.adorama.com/NK70300AFVRR.html?utm_term=Other&utm_medium=Affiliate&utm_campaign=Other&utm_source=rflAID021866

    I own one and love it..

    Jon

    Posted 2 years ago #
  5. TaoTeJared

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '10
    Posts: 2,422

    offline

    Nikon 70-300VR - VR will help tons and it is a great lens.

    80-200 is great also but much much heavier. Adding a TC just reduces the IQ especially if it is not a Nikon one.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  6. Peppermint15

    new member
    Joined: Mar '11
    Posts: 3

    offline

    I am mostly concerned with image quality at the 200mm+ focal lengths. I don't need VR because I'm shooting outdoors during the day at 1/500 or 1/750 at least. I'm not concerned a whole lot with the build. I am very tempted by the 70-300, but I already own the 80-200 and don't want to sell it and regret it later. Don't know much about the Tokina 80-400...

    Posted 2 years ago #
  7. IndyGeoff

    preferred member
    Joined: Aug '10
    Posts: 107

    offline

    80-200 with TC gives you effectively two lenses, one with f2.8 and one longer reach that is a little slower depending on which TC you use.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  8. kanuck

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,405

    offline

    I think you'd love the 70-300mm VR on your D700. I used to have one and thought it was a great lens. Despite the lack of 2.8, I always felt the 70-300 was faster than the 80-200! Seriously, but obviously not as fast as the 70-200 lenses. Maybe I had a great sample? It is super light, sharp, a good price, and the VR is really wonderful. I used to have a 70-200mm VR 1 but gave it up for the weight, and eventually traded in my 70-300 for the new 28-300mm VR. For some reason the D700 and the 70-300mm are one of those magical combinations. Some lenses really work well together giving excellent results go get one!

    Posted 2 years ago #
  9. TheCaz

    senior member
    Joined: Nov '10
    Posts: 55

    offline

    Peppermint, there's no need for this to be complicated. Since you already have an 80-200 that you like and have a budget of $500, look at the Nikon teleconverters. If the idea of lighter weight intrigues you, try the 70-300mm first.

    Most stores have 30 day return policies, so buy from one of them and find out which works for you.

    Posted 2 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.

NikonRumors Forum (http://nikonrumors.com/forum) is proudly powered by bbPress
Disclaimer: This site has no affiliation with Nikon USA or any other subsidiary of Nikon. Please visit the official Nikon website at nikon.com
Copyright © 2008-2011 NikonRumors.com