Dear alls
Hi
I am using NIKON 18-135 lens with my D200 body,when i take pictures in ISO 400 or higher with bounce light,i alway found GRAINS or pics was never taken excelent in low light
I want shift nikoin 18-105vr lens,pls guide me that is this lens work great in LOW LIGHT
thnks
18-105 ISSUE
(8 posts) (5 voices)-
Posted 2 years ago #
-
Absolutely not. It should be the same as the 18-135mm. You have to pay for speed. Look for a used 17-55mm f/2.8 or get the 35mm f/1.8 instead.
Posted 2 years ago # -
You can't expect to NOT GET noise (grain) at ISO 400 or higher (!) in low light . Especially in a "half decade ago's" DSLR .
Keeping sharpness/vivid/contrast levels to a minimum in picture settings can help though ...
Posted 2 years ago # -
Your problem is the D200, not very good in low light, the newer cameras like the D7000 will allow you to push the ISO and get good pictures in low light, even with the lens that you have.
However, the advise posted to get faster lens will also be a cure for your low light ills,
so the questio is, do you spend the money on a new camera that will do so much more than you D200, or do you spend it on the lens..........?
hmmmmmmmm this will start a war for surePosted 2 years ago # -
casperwb said:
Your problem is the D200, not very good in low light, the newer cameras like the D7000 will allow you to push the ISO and get good pictures in low light, even with the lens that you have.
However, the advise posted to get faster lens will also be a cure for your low light ills,
so the questio is, do you spend the money on a new camera that will do so much more than you D200, or do you spend it on the lens..........?
hmmmmmmmm this will start a war for sureNot much discussion there ... The faster lens will give you only an extra fstop worth of ISO at the cost of 1.5 D7000s and you will still have the 5 yr old technology. A new D7000 should be able to give more than a stop ISO advantage over the D200 .
Posted 2 years ago # -
I think that's a conservative claim, Paperman. It's probably more than a stop in a pixel-for-pixel comparison (meaning a 100% crop from each sensor), and then the D7000 has the advantage of having more of those pixels. I agree with the sentiment, though.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Dear all freinds
u all is seniour then me so i hope u must guide myself in positive wayI have also nikon sb800 but from last many days i was face problem from my this sexy sb800,problem was that when i was taken pictures with my this light,many time light was never fire,especially when i was taken pictures in long halls,anyhow my camera mechanic was replaced tube,but problem is still depressed me.mechanic told me that URS LIGHT IS OK but i was told him that light was never response many time even i was change cells...pls advice me what is problem with my this light,here i pointout once important point that i have 18-135 lens or i was borrow 18-105 lens from my friend and use during wedding,i was surprised that my sb800 work great with this 19-105 lens....i am confused that IS MY LIGHT IS REALLY OK OR PROBLEM IS DUE TO SOME FAULT IN MY 18-135 lend....pls adivce me what i do
1- can i replace my sb800
2- can i use 18-105 lens after sale my 18-135 lens
i am really in depression
pls help me
thanksPosted 2 years ago # -
"IS MY LIGHT IS REALLY OK OR PROBLEM IS DUE TO SOME FAULT IN MY 18-135"
YES!
Posted 2 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.
