Horrible day shooting « Nikon Rumors Forum

The new Nikon Rumors Forum is now live at http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussions. This forum is now in "read only" mode until I figure a proper way to import all data over to the new platform. Please register over at the new forum.


Nikon Rumors Forum

where there’s smoke there’s forum fire

Register or log in - lost password?

Nikon Rumors Forum » Nikon DSLR

Horrible day shooting

(29 posts) (18 voices)
  • Started 2 years ago by tcole1983
  • Latest reply from bjrichus
  • Related Topics:
    1. Photographer's role in critical situations
    2. Shooting FX and cropping to DX
    3. D800 Error when shooting above f8
    4. Looking for Advice to Improve on Action Sports Shooting
    5. Shooting in an indoor rockclimbing gym.

Tags:

No tags yet.

12Next »
  1. tcole1983

    preferred member
    Joined: Feb '10
    Posts: 1,553

    offline

    Wife graduated today and the auditorium had pretty terrible lighting, but just all around I felt like I was shooting bad. About half blurry pictures, but I am not sure I can help it with moving people in bad light. I have my mind set now to save some money for a faster zoom then my 18-200. We were then taking some family shots and I gave the camera to my sister in law and had it on A mode...so those are all blurry as well. Just a disappointing day all around taking pictures and I feel bad especially since it was my wife's graduation for her masters degree :( I did at least get one pretty good shot of her before everything...so not a total failure, but almost.

    Ever have those kind of days?

    Posted 2 years ago #
  2. kanuck

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,405

    offline

    I have found that you really need the higher priced lenses once you are shooting in challenging light and on the fly with VR. I bet if you were working with the 70-200mm VR1 or VR2 you'd see a big difference. I loved my old 18-200 when I was shooting with DX, but only for walking around situations. Of course everyone has "one of those days" were the shots just aren't working out, but if I were you I might add a new zoom lens to my Christmas list :)

    Posted 2 years ago #
  3. Segura

    preferred member
    Joined: Sep '09
    Posts: 120

    offline

    Curious, was your LCD display broken? I mean after a few shots you knew it was not working out right? And you didn't make some adjustments? Can't say I have those days, as I take some test shots and try to get what I can sorted out.

    You mention blurry, but I don't think you are talking about out of focus, I am sure you are talking about motion blur because your shutter was set too slow.

    So before I can chime in, what camera were you using, and what was your ISO? I am guessing you were zoomed all the way to 200mm, so you were shooting at f/5.6. You had motion blur, so your shutter was probably less than 1/100s, more like 1/60s.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  4. SilenceBrokenTT

    preferred member
    Joined: Sep '10
    Posts: 125

    offline

    As dumb as it may sound... did you check to see if your AF was on Auto or Manual? Same with the lens...

    Posted 2 years ago #
  5. kceezie

    member
    Joined: Sep '10
    Posts: 18

    offline

    I'm a beginner photo and just got into DSLR world. I have problems in low light with my 35mm 1.8 when autofocus...so usually if I notice blurriness I just switch to manual and it seems to do the job. I know it takes somewhat longer, but worth it if you can't find the autofocus working...but if you are talking about blurring like movement I would have to agree with Segura and the ISO part...I also switch to fully auto no flash if I see my pictures being messed up just to see if it is my settings (like I said I'm a noob, but it is the only way I know what I'm doing wrong and how to fix it). Don't know if this helps

    Posted 2 years ago #
  6. Rx4Photo

    preferred member
    Joined: Oct '10
    Posts: 951

    offline

    tcole1983 said:
    Wife graduated today and the auditorium had pretty terrible lighting, but just all around I felt like I was shooting bad. About half blurry pictures, but I am not sure I can help it with moving people in bad light. I have my mind set now to save some money for a faster zoom then my 18-200. We were then taking some family shots and I gave the camera to my sister in law and had it on A mode...so those are all blurry as well. Just a disappointing day all around taking pictures and I feel bad especially since it was my wife's graduation for her masters degree :( I did at least get one pretty good shot of her before everything...so not a total failure, but almost.

    Your next line should be..."that's my story and I'm sticking to it...I NEED faster glass, sweetheart!!!!" ; P

    Posted 2 years ago #
  7. Bland

    preferred member
    Joined: Nov '09
    Posts: 883

    offline

    I had the same type of day, tcole. We had our Christmas today and my flash wouldn't fire correctly. All I can figure is it was the first time I used rechargeable batteries in my SB400.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  8. Mike Gunter

    preferred member
    Joined: Sep '10
    Posts: 946

    offline

    Hi tcole,

    A faster zoom is great, but then you also have a shutter speed that you'd want watch. As Segura pointed out, a higher ISO (if your sensor and surroundings can afford it) might also help.

    You might even, heaven forbid, consider a tripod or monopod. I probably am the only person on the forum who uses one, and I use one for nearly all my shots. Not terribly convenient at all, but it really helps.

    Likely as not, you know all this and much, much more. What I would caution you on is that the weight of the fast lenses is a burden (pun not intended), and might actually cause some unintended additional blurriness. For the images to be sharp (considering the DOF), you'll likely stop down a bit anyway. Perhaps not as much as the widest as the slowest kit lens, but near it. So, your "average" gain on the main, may not be so much.

    I'm suggesting that you work with what you have, for technique anyway, before you jump into another lens.

    Congratulations to your wife! Getting a Master's Degree is a terrific accomplishment!

    Buy her something nice!

    My best,

    Mike

    Posted 2 years ago #
  9. SkintBrit

    preferred member
    Joined: Jul '10
    Posts: 1,149

    offline

    Mike Gunter said:

    You might even, heaven forbid, consider a tripod or monopod. I probably am the only person on the forum who uses one.

    A tri or mono what ?????? Never heard of them :-)

    Mike Gunter said:

    Buy her something nice!

    Yes, get her a 70-200 VR2, she'd like that! (remember to duck on your way out).

    Posted 2 years ago #
  10. smarterchild

    preferred member
    Joined: Jan '10
    Posts: 678

    offline

    I had one of those days the other day. It made me feel like crap for days and also I had a bad shoot today. :/ it just sucks but I'm hoping to get some wonderful images soon or I'll have to give away all my gear :P

    Posted 2 years ago #
  11. adamz

    The Predator
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 3,461

    offline

    Mike - You are not the only one on this forum :)

    tcole - solution is simple, get d3s + N70-200vr2, and You'll be able to take snaps even in the night :) but seriously high iso + flash is the only solution in such cases. You can also shoot RAW and underexpose 1 stop - You gonna get sharper (faster shutter speed) pictures that needs to be corrected during PP.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  12. tcole1983

    preferred member
    Joined: Feb '10
    Posts: 1,553

    offline

    I did crank the ISO up some because I was taking to practice shots before they started walking across the stage. Kind of hard to use a tripod when sitting in seats...well actually impossible or I would have. Also it was like a one shot thing...as a person is walking it is kind of hard to make any changes.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  13. bmxdad

    preferred member
    Joined: May '09
    Posts: 1,864

    offline

    tcole1983 said:
    I did crank the ISO up some because I was taking to practice shots before they started walking across the stage. Kind of hard to use a tripod when sitting in seats...well actually impossible or I would have. Also it was like a one shot thing...as a person is walking it is kind of hard to make any changes.

    Hi, Don't be afraid of cranking the ISO all the way up, yes they will have noise, but you might actual have workable pictures. There are software that can help removing some of the noise issues also

    Pete

    Posted 2 years ago #
  14. markogts

    junior member
    Joined: Sep '10
    Posts: 8

    offline

    It's almost impossible to get good pictures while sitting... However, before changing equipment, you should read this post from Thom Hogan: http://www.bythom.com/blame.htm

    Why didn't you walk nearer? Could you use a (set of) flash? Did you try beforehand some dummy shots to check white balance, histograms etc?

    Posted 2 years ago #
  15. bjrichus

    preferred member
    Joined: Nov '10
    Posts: 921

    offline

    Lots of interesting advice here about low light shooting, but for me, super fast lenses are not an option. I am not a rich person or a pro, I can only afford relatively slow longer lenses myself.

    As my kid graduated yesterday and I was in exactly the same situation myself as TCOLE1983 was, here are a few tips I got from a sports pro photographer several years ago and I hope these might help someone else as they saved the day for me:

    1. Get to the venue early. This lets you scope out the best location to shoot from and get practice shots in without being rushed. You can then know what works and what does NOT work. This lets you PLAN for the best shots and know what not to bother with; less stress and a better chance of success. Also sit on the end of the row of seats (see #4).

    2. Use a monopod. When you are in a poorly lit stadium (as I was), a monopod is useful when a tripod is not permitted or possible.

    3. Stand up. It might be rude to those behind you, but if you are there early (see #1) you can practice this to get good and quick at it. Lets be honest, being "up" for a few seconds when you HAVE to so you get the one shot you need, is better than missing it! Many photographers will tell you to overcome the embarrassment of getting in the way of someone who is waiting for their kid/wife/whatever to walk across the stage, which 99.999% of the time won't be for ages yet.

    4. Stand on the stairs. I did a few shots adopting the "tripod position" (with the monopod as one leg of the three of course) standing on the otherwise almost empty stairs next to the row of seats I was in (seated on the end seat makes this EASY).

    5. Use a monopod. I said that already, but reason #2 for this is that the best I know I can do hand held at the venue without flash (I was about 60 yards from the stage and using a 70-200mm lens) was right on the border of visible shake. Using a monopod lets me be almost 100% steady, so I was able to also use MANUAL settings... No flash at 1600ISO, 1/60th to 1/125th at F5.6-ish and I got a series of slightly noisy but well lit and tack sharp shots with just a small touch of movement blur showing where people were walking or waving fast. In short, while not perfect, I got the shots.

    If I had something like a D7000 I might have been able to go to 3200ISO and a higher shutter speed and get lower noise levels, but I don't (yet), so that's just too bad. You can't worry about the things you can't control and I did at least get the shots I wanted.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  16. bjrichus

    preferred member
    Joined: Nov '10
    Posts: 921

    offline

    Rx4Photo said:
    Your next line should be..."that's my story and I'm sticking to it...I NEED faster glass, sweetheart!!!!" ; P

    ROFL.... I know what my wife's reply would be.... :(

    Posted 2 years ago #
  17. bjrichus

    preferred member
    Joined: Nov '10
    Posts: 921

    offline

    Mike Gunter said:

    You might even, heaven forbid, consider a tripod or monopod. I probably am the only person on the forum who uses one, and I use one for nearly all my shots. Not terribly convenient at all, but it really helps.

    Mike, I couldn't agree more. A support of some kind is often a really helpful item. As one gets a little older, shake levels increase - too much good living. LOL... Seriously, I find that even my el-cheapo tri and mono pods lets me shot at 1/60th or even (most of the time on the tripod) 1/30th and be tack sharp. It is a modern (35mm street photography inspired) trend not to use a support.

    I recall reading in several text books - especially for large scale landscape and portraiture that a tripod is not an accessory but a necessity. When my kid graduated high school 4 years ago, we had the classic graduation shots done by a pro photographer in our town. The camera she used was a for then a top end DSLR costing several thousand but the support was this huge wooden and steel contraption, bolted to a massive concrete base. She said they had it made for them and it cost more than all of the cameras they used.

    Perhaps a subject for another thread? ;)

    Mike Gunter said:

    Congratulations to your wife! Getting a Master's Degree is a terrific accomplishment!

    Buy her something nice!

    Absolutely. I wonder if there is a Phd on the way too? ;)

    Posted 2 years ago #
  18. LoveTheBerry

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '10
    Posts: 156

    offline

    I've always heard that "It's the Photographer,..not the camera", but i this case,..a D3s and a 70-200 VII would make this picture work.

    I still believe that you have to have the knowledge,..but,.....

    My suggestion,..that WONDERFUL camera store in NYC can ship you intime for Christmas!

    Posted 2 years ago #
  19. Mike Gunter

    preferred member
    Joined: Sep '10
    Posts: 946

    offline

    Hi BJ,

    Tripods are more and more of a necessity for me due to my age, of course, but it does keep things sharp.

    Perhaps a tripod thread is in line. Better do a search first. ;-)

    @Lovetheberry,

    I'm in lust with FX, and I'm trying to convince myself that I need the F700, but I'm not sure that is just a green grass/other side of the hill thing.

    While there are absolutely better pictures to be made the camera, I equally sure that my market base wouldn't notice. If I bought the camera, it would be me I'd be pleasing.

    My best,

    Mike

    Posted 2 years ago #
  20. foto2021

    member
    Joined: Oct '10
    Posts: 10

    offline

    Mike Gunter said:
    You might even, heaven forbid, consider a tripod or monopod. I probably am the only person on the forum who uses one, and I use one for nearly all my shots. Not terribly convenient at all, but it really helps.

    Tripods and monopods are not of much use with moving subjects, which was the OP's problem. VR lenses reduce the effects of camera shake but do nothing to reduce motion blur.

    The answer is to use the highest ISO setting that you can get away with. While this will increase noise, at least some of that noise can be removed in post-processing.

    For a one-off occasion such as a graduation, the shooter has to decide what matters most. Choose between (1) subject blur and low noise, or (2) a crisp, sharp shot and higher noise that can be reduced (if not eliminated) with careful post-processing. I would choose (2) and increase the ISO until I had a shutter speed that all but eliminated motion blur. You may choose differently.

    Someone else suggested buying an expensive f/2.8 VR lens. This is not the answer unless you are going to make enough use of that lens to justify its high purchase price. Bear in mind that the 70-200mm f/2.8 VR lens is a large, heavy beast. It is likely to get left at home because of its weight and bulk. The occasions when you need f/2.8 may be few and far between, which is why Nikon is reported to be working on an f/4 version.

    It may be worth upgrading to a camera body that offers low noise performance at higher ISOs, such as the D7000 (DX sensor) or D700 or D3 (FX sensor). I use my D3 for theatre work (under contract) and find that images shot at ISO 12,800 need very little post-processing.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  21. bjrichus

    preferred member
    Joined: Nov '10
    Posts: 921

    offline

    foto2021 said:
    Tripods and monopods are not of much use with moving subjects, which was the OP's problem.

    If I may?

    Yesterday, I was in exactly the same situation as the OP (see my earlier lengthy comment).

    A monopod allowed me to get sharp shots when hand holding alone would not and my subject was moving about quite a bit, waving hands and jumping up and down with the emotion. I used the movement to produce a couple of shots showing that dynamic nature of the event. I need to posterize one of the shots with more blur in it in Photoshop and it'll be a bit of an 'arty' image. The other 56 images of the day (I deleted another 40 or so 'failures') are good.

    These people were not really sports shots, or street or journalistic subjects. A D7000 (couple of stops faster ISO than my current older DSLR body) and a lens one stop faster would have sorted it for me at least. Remember that not everyone is on the "upgrade the same day a product is released" (or as amateurs, can afford to be) bandwagon.

    As Mike says, using a support is out of fashion these days, and in this situation it is not like I am trying to look like Henri Cartier Bresson would with a small hand held 35mm rangefinder camera, now is it? The monopod works, and I'm going to do what works to get the shot within the limits of my budget. If that means I'm carrying a pole with a camera on the top at this event, then that's what it takes.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  22. gelu88

    preferred member
    Joined: Feb '10
    Posts: 295

    offline

    I would add this wonderful post on how to hold your camera to minimize camera shake. I rarely see these positions being used but they really work well depending on the circumstance.

    http://www.digital-photography-school.com/how-to-avoid-camera-shake

    Also, another thing i do is use my gorillapod; while shooting an opera for a paper, i sat in my seat, put my feet on the seat so my knees were level with my face, and shaped my gorillapod to be stable on my knees, this worked very well. A beanbag would also do the trick in this situation

    also, placing the gorillapod against your chest while standing creates a psudo-chest harness, and as long as you breathe properly it works well

    Posted 2 years ago #
  23. jonnyapple

    Goldfingers
    Joined: May '09
    Posts: 3,400

    offline

    I was in a convocation yesterday, too, and they were very photographer-friendly; great light, too, as they handed out the diploma covers next to a wall that was about 70% windows. Sorry about the bad experience, tcole.

    Some great advice here. Welcome to the forum, bjrichus.

    About the monopod, I have one and like it, including for panning on moving subjects. I prefer my tripod because it holds itself up. Lazy, I guess. ;-)

    Posted 2 years ago #
  24. LoveTheBerry

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '10
    Posts: 156

    offline

    *Another thought,....using the "VRII" on a tripod CAN cause more issues that not having it at all. I was told to turn off the "VRII" while using the tripod.

    *To foto's thought,...I carry my 70-200 2.8 with me at all times and have never had an issue. The ThinkTank belt has an awesome lens holder system that allows me to have the lens of choice vs. lens that with me.

    *High ISO on a D3s is not much of an issue with noise as with other cameras. If you are a "Pro" and making a living on this,..why not invest in your equipment? I remeber a story about a Wedding Photographer that had an "Issue" with a client. When it went to court, the judge asked about the equipment used. The photographer was using a entry level camera and lens, a Superstore instead of a Lab for printing and lost their BEHIND in court. As I said in the past,..would I want to have my surgeon using "entry level" forcepts, cautery, devices? No,..I want him/her to have the best and whatever they are comfortable with.

    *Lastly,..I love reading your comments. You all are very talented and a great resource for information and bouncing ideas. Thanks and have a Merry Christmas (not too politically correct,..huh?)

    Posted 2 years ago #
  25. bjrichus

    preferred member
    Joined: Nov '10
    Posts: 921

    offline

    @Gelu88: "I would add this wonderful post..." Absolutely. I see much of it is about how to set your stance up like a tripod! The first one (elbows in) is normally the #1 tip we - all of us - have forgotten at some time or another ;) I like the idea of improvising with a Gorillapod and I'll look into using one of those in the future.

    @jonnyapple: Thanks for the welcome. You had better light than I did. 1/60th was about the best shutter speed I could count on. About being lazy, I did a group shot for my office of about 60 people. I used the tripod to mount the camera and used the ML3 remote to fire it. It let me concentrate on entertaining the large group and setting up the shots. Not at all lazy... ESSENTIAL even in broad daylight.

    @LoveTheBerry: Some of us are not professionals, but enthusiasts. D3s or D7000 bodies and F2.8 or faster glass isn't something we can just go out and buy knowing that we can write off the cost against our corporation taxes next April; My gear comes out of my net pay. I take your point however as good gear can go a long way to prevent these issues. Have a Merry Christmas to you and yours too - take lots of great shots. :)

    Posted 2 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

12Next »

Reply »

You must log in to post.

NikonRumors Forum (http://nikonrumors.com/forum) is proudly powered by bbPress
Disclaimer: This site has no affiliation with Nikon USA or any other subsidiary of Nikon. Please visit the official Nikon website at nikon.com
Copyright © 2008-2011 NikonRumors.com