Capture NX3 nearing? « Nikon Rumors Forum

The new Nikon Rumors Forum is now live at http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussions. This forum is now in "read only" mode until I figure a proper way to import all data over to the new platform. Please register over at the new forum.


Nikon Rumors Forum

where there’s smoke there’s forum fire

Register or log in - lost password?

Nikon Rumors Forum » Nikon Software

Capture NX3 nearing?

(40 posts) (26 voices)
  • Started 2 years ago by ericbowles
  • Latest reply from DaddySS
  • Related Topics:
    1. Color Efex 3 for Capture NX2 No longer sold on both Nik and Nikon website
    2. Capture NX2 and OSX Lion?
    3. Raw differences between ViewNX2 and Adobe
    4. What software do you prefer?
    5. Capture-> photoshop?

Tags:

  • 10.7
  • Capture
  • Capture NX2
  • Capture NX3
  • Lion
  • Mac OSX
  • Nik
  • Nikon Capture NX2 bundled with D300
  • Nikon Capture NX3 release
  • NX2
  • NX3
« Previous12
  1. DutchNikon

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '11
    Posts: 241

    offline

    Well , you can pre-order a book on capture NX3 on a Belgian Site ( the book is written in Dutch) ... (the EAN Number is 9789043022422) and they say they will start distributing it at December 1st this year..., other suppliers say febe. 1st 22012... :-)

    Posted 1 year ago #
  2. lenlesmac

    new member
    Joined: Dec '11
    Posts: 1

    offline

    I don't get it. This article says CNX2 is now compatible with Lion 10.7: http://www.pixiq.com/article/nikon-update-capture-nx2-and-view-nx But I tried it this morning and still can't install it with the same PowerPC error. What gives? Has anyone gotten this to work. The download for Capture NX2 2.3 is here: http://support.nikonusa.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/17613

    Help...

    Posted 1 year ago #
  3. Shreds

    new member
    Joined: Jan '12
    Posts: 2

    offline

    Dont bother, it still doesnt work

    Posted 1 year ago #
  4. SkintBrit

    preferred member
    Joined: Jul '10
    Posts: 1,149

    offline

    I've got an invite to a training day, and to handle the D4 and 85 1.8 at Nikon's UK HQ at the end of the month, while I'm there I've got the option of buying a heavily discounted copy of Capture NX2. Worth doing or wait for NX3?

    Posted 1 year ago #
  5. scoobysmak

    preferred member
    Joined: May '10
    Posts: 226

    offline

    I admit I am in the same boat but I wont get the extreme discount you will. I would be very tempted in your shoes. If its under $50 with your discount, I believe the update from capture to capture 2 was only aprox $60. I can not confirm this and I might have it mixed up with other software but if you can get NX 2 now and just do an update then you would have the best of both worlds for about the same price. I would do a bit more research if a deal like that came my way but I highly doubt Nikon is going to invite me to a training day anytime soon.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  6. SkintBrit

    preferred member
    Joined: Jul '10
    Posts: 1,149

    offline

    Thanks scooby, I think they offer copies to delegates for £80-90, a lot more than small change but a lot less than the £150 that I would normally have to spend.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  7. spraynpray

    preferred member
    Joined: Feb '10
    Posts: 1,514

    offline

    Can you tell me what capture 2 offers that Lightroom 3.6 doesn't? I hear it has some NIK Software-like facilities.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  8. SkintBrit

    preferred member
    Joined: Jul '10
    Posts: 1,149

    offline

    spraynpray said:
    Can you tell me what capture 2 offers that Lightroom 3.6 doesn't? I hear it has some NIK Software-like facilities.

    Not me, I don't own either. Anyone else?

    Posted 1 year ago #
  9. mr.wesley

    new member
    Joined: Feb '12
    Posts: 1

    offline

    spraynpray said:
    Can you tell me what capture 2 offers that Lightroom 3.6 doesn't? I hear it has some NIK Software-like facilities.

    I've been trying and re-trying all the different software options, and while each of them have their own great strengths, I keep coming back to NX2 for the simple reason that when shooting in RAW what you see in camera is what you see in NX2, whereas with all the others, you have to do some tweaking to get your raw file to look the way you shot it.

    For NX3, if it's coming, I'm hoping it provides an interface and functionality similar to that of Hasselblad's Phocus (which, from what I can tell, is derived from LR, Capture One, and Aperture) and includes tethered shooting capabilities. That would be brilliant!

    Posted 1 year ago #
  10. toneil14741

    new member
    Joined: Feb '12
    Posts: 1

    offline

    CNX2 works with Lion. However, it must be installed on snow leopard first. I heard about this before I upgraded to Lion. I purposely ordered my Macpro with Snow Leopard, installed CNX2, then Lion and no problems (other than it still be slow as heck). I look forward to CNX3 and hope it fixes speeds on Macs. The ONLY S/W I have issue with on MAC but I still use this s/w exclusively.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  11. ericbowles

    senior member
    Joined: Jun '09
    Posts: 56

    offline

    Apparently we still don't have any word on Capture NX3. I talked with a Nikon dealer recently who had actually seen a pre-alpha Capture NX3 demo nearly a year ago but apparently there are contractual issues between Nik and Nikon. I heard from a different source that Capture NX3 required a complete rework of the software design for the next step, but at that point would be extended to cameras beyond Nikon.

    Sorry about the long post here - but we have some incomplete information about a comparison of Capture and other programs.

    I don't use Lightroom ( I have LR4 - just no real need to use it) - just View and Capture for 99% of my images. I use CS5 on about 1% of my published images - mainly for cloning. I use Photo Mechanic for keywording and batch resizing. I have the Color Efex plugin from Nik and use it within Capture. I have Silver Efex from Nik and use it as a stand alone program.

    Our local camera club did a side by side comparison of Lightroom and Capture a year ago. We found both programs would handle more than 95-98% of the editing process of a full time pro. Each has places where you might want alternate programs, but for most photographers it is a matter of choice and personal preference not capability. If your workflow is built around earlier Adobe software, the learning curve may not justify a switch. For most people, a 30 day trial is a very poor way to evaluate the software. You simply won't be far enough along the learning curve to understand the full capability and workflow.

    First understand that Capture is for editing individual images that need an advanced edit. For downloading, rating, browsing, and quick edits View NX2 is preferred to Capture. View NX2 edits to the image are applied globally. In View, you can adjust White Balance, Picture Controls, and make other global edits to exposure, saturation, contrast, brightness, highlight protection, shadow recovery, etc. View NX2 handles resizing, JPEG creation, and can be used as a RAW converter. View handles some batch edits but can be a little slow. I use View NX2 for processing images from events and other high volume activities. Only 1-2% of my shots go into Capture NX2 for detailed editing.

    Capture NX2 provides two groups of edits. The Develop section was developed by Nikon and mirrors many of the camera settings. Steps in the Develop section are applied globally. The Develop section has some unique capability to make adjustments to the RAW file that cannot be made to processed files like JPEG, TIFF, etc. It's the section where you have the opportunity to adjust white balance, choose and adjust Picture Control settings, adjust Active D-Lighting, or use moire reduction. It also includes the quick adjustment tools that are in View NX2.

    The Adjust section of Capture NX2 was largely developed by Nik. All edits to NEF images are maintained as a list of editing steps. At any point in time you can go back to any editing step and make changes or remove the effect. Groups of edits can be retained as Versions - so a single image might have a list of versions that include B&W, Color, and other treatments. The edits are kept in a single NEF file. The original NEF file includes a small basic JPEG. The edited NEF file includes a medium sized JPEG as part of the file - kind of like a sidecar but with no need to manage the location as it is fully embedded. Photo Mechanic is able to extract and use a copy of this embedded JPEG.

    Capture includes a wide range of editing capabilities and the ability to apply those edits selectively. The software is known for the U-point technology developed by Nik, and smart selection tools to make any edit to just a specific part of the image. Many of the editing tools are basic edits applied in a very controlled manner. For example, Control Points can be used to adjust brightness, contrast, saturation, color channels, or white balance to specific areas of an image with a unique user interface. Or you can use other selection tools - gradients, vignette, brush, or area selections to apply an effect. Capture has some special tools that are unique. D-Lighting applied selectively can be a very nice addition to shadow recovery. And Capture provides both High Pass and UnSharp Mask methods of sharpening which can both be applied selectively. The integration of Color Efex is very nice - Color efex edits are completely integrated with Capture providing the ability to apply edits selectively.

    The latest version of Capture NX2 is significantly faster than earlier versions. It's a little slow with the large files of the D800, but for normal image processing is quite adequate when used for a single image. The latest version probably cut processing time in half compared to earlier versions.

    Capture is not a graphics editor. It has a small but functional cloning tool - a healing brush. Capture does not handle major cloning. It does not support combining multiple images. And it does not handle watermarks or putting type on an image.

    Capture NX2 is as close to a full pixel editor as Nikon and Nik could produce with a very user-friendly interface. Capture supports a wide range of workflow approaches. I know of a Canon Explorer of Light that converts his images and uses Capture NX2 for processing instead of Lightroom and Photoshop. There are lots of advantages of Capture but the straight forward interface and speed of editing can be pretty compelling. And if you like the Nik products, you will probably like Capture.

    Posted 11 months ago #
  12. hoxton fives

    new member
    Joined: Oct '12
    Posts: 2

    offline

    So now we have october 2012 and still no news for capture nx3. I really like cnx2 because I know it well and can do post-processing quickly. however, none of the great new nik plug-ins for sharpening etc. work with cnx2. So the first time in years I am considering moving to lightroom. Any news if there will be cnx3 soon?

    Posted 7 months ago #
  13. SkintBrit

    preferred member
    Joined: Jul '10
    Posts: 1,149

    offline

    I've not heard anything. It seems very strange to me that Nikon would, if for no other reason, miss a marketing opportunity and leave NX2 un-touched for such a long time. Every other company I can think of, updates it's software every couple of years, and charges it's users for the privilege. I'm greatful that I don't have that expense, but bemused none the less.

    Posted 7 months ago #
  14. earthsea

    senior member
    Joined: May '12
    Posts: 69

    offline

    I used to use capture NX2 all the time and loved it, it shipped free with my D300. When lightroom4 came along I downloaded the free trial version and did some comparison tests with the editing tools and concluded that lightroom's color pallet and sharpening tools gave lot better results. I also often use the manual option in Lens correction, also better than in NX2. Lightroom has a great key wording system where NX2 has none.
    NX2 does have one better aspect about it and that is you can use the develop tools with all the adjustments, where in LR you are limited to just a few main adjustments offered with the develop tools.
    When NX2 was first released it was well ahead of its time offering big bang for your buck, I have read some place that mega-bucks went into its development, but sadly it is slowly being left in the dust as lightroom4 seems to be becoming more and more popular. I can't help wonder if Nikon have made a consious desission not to update NX2 and just keep offering free VeiwNX2 instead as it has an adjustment panel supplied with it.
    If NX3 was released tomorrow I would certainly trial it and have a play but it would have to be pretty special before I would change back.

    Posted 7 months ago #
  15. DaddySS

    new member
    Joined: Jan '12
    Posts: 2

    offline

    I like the simplicity and ease of use of View and Capture. I have LR and PS but the first stop for me in post is always View, then Capture if necessary. Like Eric, I use PS for more significant pixel work but 90% of my shots go to View and done.

    I use LR primarily to find photos with keywords.

    Posted 7 months ago #

RSS feed for this topic

« Previous12

Reply

You must log in to post.

NikonRumors Forum (http://nikonrumors.com/forum) is proudly powered by bbPress
Disclaimer: This site has no affiliation with Nikon USA or any other subsidiary of Nikon. Please visit the official Nikon website at nikon.com
Copyright © 2008-2011 NikonRumors.com