Nikon and Canon High Megapixel flagships? « Nikon Rumors Forum

The new Nikon Rumors Forum is now live at http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussions. This forum is now in "read only" mode until I figure a proper way to import all data over to the new platform. Please register over at the new forum.


Nikon Rumors Forum

where there’s smoke there’s forum fire

Register or log in - lost password?

Nikon Rumors Forum » Nikon DSLR

Nikon and Canon High Megapixel flagships?

(8 posts) (7 voices)
  • Started 2 years ago by smarterchild
  • Latest reply from kanuck
  • Related Topics:
    1. What was the moment you realized that you needed to move up to FX?
    2. Best wide/standard FX prime - 24mm 28mm 35mm 50mm
    3. How much the actual cost for upgrading to FX?
    4. i own D7000 and FX Lenses, upgrade to d600?
    5. Beginners Lens Question

Tags:

  • fx
  1. smarterchild

    preferred member
    Joined: Jan '10
    Posts: 678

    offline

    http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/09/canon-nikon-flagships-in-2011/

    Post over on Canonrumors.com. Wonder what camera nikon will be thinking about releaseing...

    Posted 2 years ago #
  2. DaveyJ

    preferred member
    Joined: Jun '10
    Posts: 452

    offline

    The ONLY thing many of us look for on a D700 replacement is HD video about in the category of the D7000. The high mega-pixel mentality is very misleading. I own and shoot a number of DSLR cameras and every time Canon releases a new flagship camera I go test it to see if it is worth buying. What Nikon DOES need to fix is the price on a camera like the D3x which may wok for big budget pros but the reason that camera costs so much is the level of hand work and detail. The camera could have been sold at a lower price, have the same quality within reason, but the market simply does not have a place for a DSLR camera sold at any appreciable volume at over $4,000 for the body.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  3. Krevlin

    preferred member
    Joined: Jun '10
    Posts: 316

    offline

    Nikon is not cheap, they've never been, which is why many consumers go to Canon, also Canon can afford to have lower prices since it's bigger and have more production facilities.

    Plus the D3X competes with medium format and it's 8K price is well below those cameras and since most people rent MF cameras the D3X is priced so some shooters who don't need higher MPs could own it.

    Nikon is very photographer oriented so they make cameras for certain types of photographer.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  4. kanuck

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,405

    offline

    I just posted a link that I'm sure a lot of you saw in that the D800 rumors are out again this time calling for a February 2011 date now based on a French Book that will come out then. I have heard so much junk on the D700 refresh that I usually don't read into it much anymore, but this rumor had me wondering. Either way, the D800 wouldn't be Nikon flagship camera anyways, just mimic the D3x best features, with maybe a touch better ISO performance and video? Come to think of it, it would be better! haha

    Posted 2 years ago #
  5. NikoDoby

    The Terminator
    Joined: May '09
    Posts: 6,598

    offline

    Old news. We've know that canon has been working on a 30 plus megapixel replacement for the 1Ds for about a year now. Sony is also rumored to be working on a high mp sensor for the a900 replacement so naturally that always gets associated with a potential Nikon model too. I've even heard of 40 and 50mp DSLR models being "tested/prototyped"! Nothing concrete though, just a bunch of rumors :^)

    Posted 2 years ago #
  6. TaoTeJared

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '10
    Posts: 2,422

    offline

    Seems like everything doubles every four years or is at least running at 4mp increase every 2. 16, 18, 22, 24, 28, 32- just mostly hard drive fillers for me. Watched a friend this weekend sell 25 photos at an art show - all shot with a D70s. Next to her was a guy touting he took them with a Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III and he didn't sell a thing.
    Tech be damned!

    Posted 2 years ago #
  7. spraynpray

    preferred member
    Joined: Feb '10
    Posts: 1,514

    offline

    I thought that the concensus was that we have enough megapixels now, and that what we need is wider dynamic range and lower noise?

    Posted 2 years ago #
  8. kanuck

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,405

    offline

    Either way, I think photographers are in for more than a few treats over the next few years as digital cameras start to possibly match slide film quality. Some may argue that we already have slide film quality if your photoshop skills are good enough. Remember how amazed your were when the D3 first came out? The specs seemed unreal so prepare to become wowed again! :)

    Posted 2 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.

NikonRumors Forum (http://nikonrumors.com/forum) is proudly powered by bbPress
Disclaimer: This site has no affiliation with Nikon USA or any other subsidiary of Nikon. Please visit the official Nikon website at nikon.com
Copyright © 2008-2011 NikonRumors.com