New Nikon 35mm 1.4G discussion « Nikon Rumors Forum

The new Nikon Rumors Forum is now live at http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussions. This forum is now in "read only" mode until I figure a proper way to import all data over to the new platform. Please register over at the new forum.


Nikon Rumors Forum

where there’s smoke there’s forum fire

Register or log in - lost password?

Nikon Rumors Forum » Nikon Lenses

New Nikon 35mm 1.4G discussion

(67 posts) (21 voices)
  • Started 2 years ago by Gareth
  • Latest reply from ajm057
  • Related Topics:
    1. How much would you pay for a new 35 F1.4G FX lens
    2. Nikon D600 samples with 45mm F2.8P, AF-D 18-35mm, 80-200mm F/2.8D
    3. Filter recommendation for Nikon 135mm f/2 DC?
    4. nikon l120 discussion
    5. Torn between the Nikon 16-35mm and Nikon 24-70mm

Tags:

  • 35mm f/1.4 g AFS
  • 35mm F1.4G
123Next »
  1. Gareth

    preferred member
    Joined: Sep '10
    Posts: 591

    offline

    I'm very interested in this lens. I am hoping for many things, one of them being a reasonably compact size.

    I posted this on the blog, but many will miss it;

    after having a play with that 35mm pic layered on a 24mm 1.4 and 50 1.4, i have come to some conclusions.

    first, you don’t need photoshop to see.

    the front element is very far forward (much more so than 24 1.4 and 50 1.4).

    second.

    the pic seems to be at a slightly different angle to the ones on nikonusa.com.

    if i just shrink the pic down so the contacts are the same size as the ones on the 24mm pic, the 35mm is significantly longer than the 24mm.

    but as i said, the curves are harder than the 24, leading me to think it is at a different angle. so i adjusted the pic so that the face plate is the same size as the 24mm (not using the same dimensions) and assuming the face plates are the same size (this is possible).

    after doing this the mount lined up perfectly and the back curve of the lens lined up perfectly, and the af contacts lined up perfectly with the 24mm.

    leading to my conclusion that they are the almost same size. the 24 is slightly wider at the far end (very slight).

    Photobucket

    the 35 is on top in black at 30% opacity. the 24 is underneath in red at 100% opacity.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  2. shivaswrath

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 841

    offline

    i think this lens will be a winner DEPENDING ON PRICE!

    The 24 1.4 is way too expensive for fast AND wide at $2199 or whatever.

    The 85 1.4 is stupidly expensive too at $1799 or whatever.

    If this lens can come in at $1099, it'll be worth it. . .otherwise, it's just too expensive to justify IMO.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  3. NSXType-R

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 2,803

    offline

    Too expensive!!!

    Posted 2 years ago #
  4. Abhinav

    preferred member
    Joined: Aug '10
    Posts: 202

    offline

    As rumors suggests it will be priced at $1800 or around .I will rather get 85mm,if I ever get one .

    Posted 2 years ago #
  5. shivaswrath

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 841

    offline

    jesus, $1800, that's just stupid. . .

    what's weird, I've seen prices drop on the 16-35/4 almost by $200 since it's introduction. . .I wonder if all of these lenses have that much movement in pricing after the early adopters gobble them up?

    I'm sorry, but I'd cough up the extra $300 and get the 24 1.4 for a truly wide and fast experience. . .

    Posted 2 years ago #
  6. Gareth

    preferred member
    Joined: Sep '10
    Posts: 591

    offline

    have you tried the 24? i have tried 5 copies. and for my shooting style it definitely wasn't what i wanted. it distorts heads horribly at close distances unless they are bang in the middle of the frame. i don't put my subject bang in the middle of the frame unless i have no other choice. many copies seem to have af troubles as well.

    35mm = less distortion

    1.4 = great for low light and isolation.

    nikon = af

    now that af just needs to be very fast and very accurate and then i will spend the $1800.

    also needs great colour reproduction and corner to corner sharpness at 1.4 (lol assuming the subject is 2mm deep on the focal plane from one edge of the shot to the other).

    if it does all of this it will be worth the 1800, and many people will buy it. it is not an amateur lens, most people who buy it will be using it to make money. eg photojournalists.

    i am going to use it for

    birthday parties
    low light 'chef-at-work' style shots
    sports team group photos

    will it pay for itself?

    i have no doubt

    Posted 2 years ago #
  7. Abhinav

    preferred member
    Joined: Aug '10
    Posts: 202

    offline

    shivaswrath said:
    jesus, $1800, that's just stupid. . .

    what's weird, I've seen prices drop on the 16-35/4 almost by $200 since it's introduction. . ..

    Nikon loves to price lenses with "N" coating like Gold .

    Posted 2 years ago #
  8. smarterchild

    preferred member
    Joined: Jan '10
    Posts: 678

    offline

    This lens attracts me. I find 24 to wide for a prime sometimes on my film cameras and 50 to tight when shooting for fun. Nikon has made it hard this year to deicde what to get :/ either the 85 or this and save for the d4 or d800

    Posted 2 years ago #
  9. Gareth

    preferred member
    Joined: Sep '10
    Posts: 591

    offline

    Oh i cant wait to try this on sunday

    price is $1,799.95

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0042X9LB0?ie=UTF8&tag=nikorumo-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B0042X9LB0

    officially here

    http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/lens/singlefocal/wide/af-s_35mmf_14g/index.htm

    Posted 2 years ago #
  10. Gareth

    preferred member
    Joined: Sep '10
    Posts: 591

    offline

    OMG

    look at the samples

    http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/lens/singlefocal/wide/af-s_35mmf_14g/sample.htm#sample1

    sold

    Posted 2 years ago #
  11. noxin

    preferred member
    Joined: Nov '09
    Posts: 246

    offline

    I've been looking for a lens just like this to be released for a while now. I was leaning to the manual version then I heard about this announcement. I'd be first in line, but that 1800 bucks seems quite steep. I may look at sticking with a used manual 35/1.4 or getting the 35 / 2.0 and the Sigma 20/1.8 and 24/1.8, and 30/1.8 all for the price of this lens. But seriously, is the image quality and bokeh that much better than the 35/2.0 or manual 35/1.4 lens?

    Posted 2 years ago #
  12. Drab

    preferred member
    Joined: Aug '10
    Posts: 540

    offline

    @ sub f/4 many lenses trump the 35 AF-D. So I expect this lens to be no different (CLARIFICATION EDIT: I expect the 1.4 would also trump the 2 sub f/4 and possibly higher).

    I've never used the 35 MF, so I have no idea about that.

    That said, the 35 f/2 is very small, very light, very cheap, and excellent for center-subject photography at all f stops. It fails when you care about the edges (not just the corners) when not stopped down to ~4 (YMMV on where it gets better).

    Posted 2 years ago #
  13. adamz

    The Predator
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 3,461

    offline

    it's a little bit more expensive than I expected, but I'm eager to see a comparison test between this and 35/1.8, as I'm in market for 35mm lens this year (DX)
    the images at nikon imaging are nice, but I wonder why they didn't go with f1.4, as that's the only reason You gonna buy this lens

    Posted 2 years ago #
  14. adamz

    The Predator
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 3,461

    offline

    it's a little bit more expensive than I expected, but I'm eager to see a comparison test between this and 35/1.8, as I'm in market for 35mm lens this year (DX)
    the images at nikon imaging are nice, but I wonder why they didn't go with f1.4, as that's the only reason You gonna buy this lens

    Posted 2 years ago #
  15. shivaswrath

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 841

    offline

    shit, saw sample pics, I'm sold. . .ok, like it more than the 24 1.4. . .more contrasty renditions and colors.

    WOW.

    can anyone read EXIF on the pics and let us know body it was shot with?
    http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/lens/singlefocal/wide/af-s_35mmf_14g/sample.htm#sample1

    Posted 2 years ago #
  16. shivaswrath

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 841

    offline

    Gareth said:
    have you tried the 24? i have tried 5 copies. and for my shooting style it definitely wasn't what i wanted. it distorts heads horribly at close distances unless they are bang in the middle of the frame. i don't put my subject bang in the middle of the frame unless i have no other choice. many copies seem to have af troubles as well.

    35mm = less distortion

    1.4 = great for low light and isolation.

    nikon = af

    now that af just needs to be very fast and very accurate and then i will spend the $1800.

    also needs great colour reproduction and corner to corner sharpness at 1.4 (lol assuming the subject is 2mm deep on the focal plane from one edge of the shot to the other).

    if it does all of this it will be worth the 1800, and many people will buy it. it is not an amateur lens, most people who buy it will be using it to make money. eg photojournalists.

    i am going to use it for

    birthday parties
    low light 'chef-at-work' style shots
    sports team group photos

    will it pay for itself?

    i have no doubt

    No doubt - yeah, haven't tried it, but I've heard horror stories re: sample variation and distortion. Distortion, however, doesn't phase me as I use DxO to automatically correct things (once they get a module for the lens+body I am referring to).

    Independent of that, this will be a nice walk around lens for FX users and I'm stoked about it. . .

    Posted 2 years ago #
  17. heartyfisher

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,701

    offline

    shivaswrath said:
    shit, saw sample pics, I'm sold. . .ok, like it more than the 24 1.4. . .more contrasty renditions and colors.

    WOW.

    can anyone read EXIF on the pics and let us know body it was shot with?
    http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/lens/singlefocal/wide/af-s_35mmf_14g/sample.htm#sample1

    Mixture of D700 and D3S

    I am not looking any more... Too nice! I am going to ignore it and forget I ever saw those pictures. For FF that 35 1.4 is a must have lens! luckily I dont have a FF !! ok time for the mind wipe!

    Posted 2 years ago #
  18. pcraigs

    member
    Joined: Nov '09
    Posts: 44

    offline

    If you dont mind vignetting or dark corners the 35mm F1.8 AF-s is a really cheaper and good alternative.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  19. Abhinav

    preferred member
    Joined: Aug '10
    Posts: 202

    offline

    shiva : so you're getting this lens :D

    Posted 2 years ago #
  20. dazey

    junior member
    Joined: Sep '10
    Posts: 8

    offline

    I have a converted pre-ai 35mm f1.4 (the radioactive thorium glass one!) which I love. I have been waiting for the AF version to arrive for ages, but at the price of the new one, I am not sure I can justify upgrading. The samples don't really look that much better than mine. I expect the new one to be more controlled wide open but for some reason Nikon have chosen not to give us any samples so perhaps its not as good as I was expecting.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  21. jpascuaphoto

    new member
    Joined: Sep '10
    Posts: 4

    offline

    My first post. Just joined the forum! Pre-ordered the 35mm 1.4 and am excited. I've rented the new 24mm 1.4 a few times for weddings and felt it was a little too wide for me for the getting ready shots and reception shots. Everything else about it was just awesome. So, I'm crossing my fingers that the 35mm will function exactly the same!

    Posted 2 years ago #
  22. adamz

    The Predator
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 3,461

    offline

    gratz jpascuaphoto and welcome to the forum

    Posted 2 years ago #
  23. Gareth

    preferred member
    Joined: Sep '10
    Posts: 591

    offline

    i'm going to have a hard time waiting for this to drop down from the initial full price, but the prices on kakaku at present (sometimes coneco is a bit cheaper) are;

    AF-S NIKKOR 85mm f/1.4G ¥169,877

    AF-S NIKKOR 24mm f/1.4G ED ¥197,800

    the new release price of the 35 1.4 is ¥241,500, but i expect it to drop down to right in the middle of the other two, so maybe

    AF-S NIKKOR 35mm f/1.4G ¥183,838

    I can buy two sb-700 when they come down in price for that 60 000 saving.

    But the waiting.

    .

    .

    Posted 2 years ago #
  24. Gareth

    preferred member
    Joined: Sep '10
    Posts: 591

    offline

    oh

    i just looked on coneco

    it already on the way, looks like i wont have to wait long

    **Link Removed**

    already reservable for

    ¥184,700

    Posted 2 years ago #
  25. shivaswrath

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 841

    offline

    Abhinav said:
    shiva : so you're getting this lens :D

    let's hope, haha!

    Posted 2 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

123Next »

Reply »

You must log in to post.

NikonRumors Forum (http://nikonrumors.com/forum) is proudly powered by bbPress
Disclaimer: This site has no affiliation with Nikon USA or any other subsidiary of Nikon. Please visit the official Nikon website at nikon.com
Copyright © 2008-2011 NikonRumors.com