New 85mm f1.4 Discussion « Nikon Rumors Forum

The new Nikon Rumors Forum is now live at http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussions. This forum is now in "read only" mode until I figure a proper way to import all data over to the new platform. Please register over at the new forum.


Nikon Rumors Forum

where there’s smoke there’s forum fire

Register or log in - lost password?

Nikon Rumors Forum » Nikon Lenses

New 85mm f1.4 Discussion

(43 posts) (21 voices)
  • Started 2 years ago by NikoDoby
  • Latest reply from shivaswrath
  • Related Topics:
    1. AF-S Nikon 85mm 1.4G feedback
    2. Prime lens swap?
    3. 85mm F1.4G in addition to the 35mm?
    4. Upcoming Nikon Announcement on April 19th
    5. Sigma 85mm F/1.4 Anyone tried it yet?

Tags:

  • 85mm
  • f/1.4
  • New 85mm f1.4
  • Nikon
« Previous12
  1. NikoDoby

    The Terminator
    Joined: May '09
    Posts: 6,598

    offline

    No it doesn't so send it to me and I'll bury it for you :-)

    Posted 2 years ago #
  2. shivaswrath

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 841

    offline

    yeah the more I look at sample images, the more I don't like the bokeh. .it's in between the nervousness of the 35 1.8 and the 50 1.4.

    I think the VR must have been dropped for optical reasons, because I'm sure Nikon tried it out and saw that it wouldn't cut it. . .(only reason I could see why they would do that). . .

    Posted 2 years ago #
  3. heartyfisher

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,701

    offline

    shivaswrath said:
    yeah the more I look at sample images, the more I don't like the bokeh. .it's in between the nervousness of the 35 1.8 and the 50 1.4.

    I think the VR must have been dropped for optical reasons, because I'm sure Nikon tried it out and saw that it wouldn't cut it. . .(only reason I could see why they would do that). . .

    Maybe.. but I think if there was a VR version of that lens it would be a totally different lense design and formula so its not a simple thing of just "dropping" VR

    Posted 2 years ago #
  4. JorPet

    preferred member
    Joined: Feb '10
    Posts: 261

    offline

    That image from Niko reminds me of a Gee Bee for some reason...

    I haven't liked the bokeh I have seen on the new lens either. It seems to create distinct "water droplet" like circles in the background (not around a light source). Seems a bit ugly to me.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  5. shivaswrath

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 841

    offline

    now the 55-300 VR has nice bokeh. . .haha, of course, right?!

    Stoked about the 24-120 and hopefully an updated 70-300 VR3 (around the next FX announcement)!

    Posted 2 years ago #
  6. TaoTeJared

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '10
    Posts: 2,422

    offline

    Now there is a ton of sample photos out there:

    So I have been saving up and will sell some stuff to either:
    A) buy the new 85 1.4
    or
    B) Buy the older version AND the new 24-120 f4.
    or
    C) Keep my 85mm 1.8 and get the new 24-120 f4.
    or
    D) Keep the 85 1.8, Tokina 24-70 2.8, & old 24-120mm vr and just get over it.

    Both 85s are great, but is the newer one's image quality worth that much more?

    Any thoughts? Been thinking about this for a week and my head hurts.

    Background: I shoot mainly available light, love very fast lenses for bokeh, D300, buy lenses to either sell for more or hold forever.

    Thanks everyone!

    Posted 2 years ago #
  7. jonnyapple

    Goldfingers
    Joined: May '09
    Posts: 3,400

    offline

    I'd do option C or D and pocket the difference to upgrade to the D400 when it comes out (or a D700 if the price drops even further?).

    I have to say I have no experience with either 85 1.4, so I'm basing my suggestion on when I had the 50 1.2. I thought the dof was too thin and found myself usually shooting at f/2 or f/2.8. I would rather spend to have better low-light performance on my camera. I love the 85 1.8, too.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  8. NSXType-R

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 2,803

    offline

    Wow, that 3100 with a 85mm 1.4 is beautiful.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  9. smarterchild

    preferred member
    Joined: Jan '10
    Posts: 678

    offline

    Id say wait till you have a FF body to get the 85. I had my 50 for my DX right before i got my FF and i have to say, you get the benifit of the 1.4 fast prime lenses on the FF. Get the 24-120 F4 and pocket money for the D700 and save up for the new or old 85 1.4 and just use the 85 1.8.

    im not dissing primes on DX, i just feel to get the whole feel of the 1.4 lenses. the depth of field is MUCH greater in FX

    EDIT: I have the new 85 1.4 AF-S ordered and its been about 3 weeks now. Once i get it in 1 or 2 weeks. ill post some examples up

    Posted 2 years ago #
  10. PrimeLine

    junior member
    Joined: Sep '10
    Posts: 5

    offline

    Just an opinion: "smartchild" gets my vote. I've always emphatically believed it's first about the quality of the "glass". The most expensive lens/new glass isn't always the best glass! There is some truly great glass and still very useful older lenses out there. Still, try to buy the best glass you can afford...be pragmatic about it, focus and evaluate your needs; not to the needs of others. Excellent "glass" on an "acceptable" camera body, with rare exception, is always preferable to an "excellent" camera body mounted with simply an "acceptable lens. The object is to merge the "excellent" factor of both over time. A lens can be a longterm investment. Attempt to purchase "to your needs" and expanding creativity. Think of next year; will your purchase provide for growth? Best wishes.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  11. TaoTeJared

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '10
    Posts: 2,422

    offline

    I already decided I'm not going to buy the D300 upgrade this time around and focus on glass for another two years. I have been upgrading my glass for 2 years and the 85mm and 24-120 F4 is all I have left that is high dollar.

    I am really interested if anyone has tried the new 85mm afs vs the old 85mm afd and if it is really worth it. If the AFS is just marginally better then I'll save the money and get the AFD version.

    Here is my glass path so you have an idea what I have tried and am keeping.

    Nikon 50mm F1.4 Sell Swap to a 50mm f1.8
    Nikon 85mm D F1.8 Sell Upgrade to 85mm f1.4
    Nikon 24-120mm F3.5 Sell Upgrade to 24-120 VR F4
    Sigma 30mm F1.4 Sell
    Nikon 24-85mm ED G F3.5 Sell
    Tokina 28-70mm F2.6 Sell
    Nikon 180mm ED F2.8 Sell

    Sigma 15mm F2.8 Keep
    Tokina 17mm F3.5 Keep
    Nikon 24mm F2.8 Keep
    Nikon 35mm F1.8 Keep
    Nikon 60mm F2.8 Keep
    Nikon 105mm VR F2.8 Keep
    Tokina 12-24mm F4 Keep
    Nikon 70-200mm VR F2.8 Keep
    Nikon 70-300mm VR F4.5 Keep

    Posted 2 years ago #
  12. smarterchild

    preferred member
    Joined: Jan '10
    Posts: 678

    offline

    Tao, i will link you a great review for the 85 1.4. Isaw it the other day and made me glad i got the new one.

    http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/blog/2010/09/85mm_review/

    http://nikonrumors.com/2010/10/09/nikon-af-s-85mm-f1-4g-lens-hands-on.aspx

    http://www.flickr.com/groups/afs85mmf14g/discuss/72157624844286995/

    In my eyes aftere seeing some comparrasion. i noticed the difference easily. Also kenrockwells review of this lens is pretty interesting, He mentioned that this lens has NO coma at night 1.4 shooting. The other lens that does not have any is the 58 or whatever noct 1.2.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  13. TaoTeJared

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '10
    Posts: 2,422

    offline

    @Smarterchild - Great link! That just makes everything just harder. :)

    Posted 2 years ago #
  14. smarterchild

    preferred member
    Joined: Jan '10
    Posts: 678

    offline

    Glad to help make you more confused :)

    Posted 2 years ago #
  15. shivaswrath

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 841

    offline

    nice job admin on the review page!!

    Posted 2 years ago #
  16. TaoTeJared

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '10
    Posts: 2,422

    offline

    +1 on that Admin!

    I'm still debating... The bokeh and sharpness wide open is unbelievable.

    Hard to imagine they improved the lens that much but they did. If only my pockets were deeper I would get all of Nikon's 1.4s now.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  17. broxibear

    preferred member
    Joined: Oct '10
    Posts: 254

    offline

    Came across a very interesting comparison between the 85mm f/1.4D and Nikon AF 85mm f/1.8D
    nikonjin.com/forum/printthread.php?tid=272&page=1

    The current UK prices are 85mm f/1.8D £300 / 85mm f/1.4D £1360

    Posted 2 years ago #
  18. shivaswrath

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 841

    offline

    I ended up going the other way....decided to skip the af-s, and just got the 85 1.4d used for $700....60% savings over af-s?

    Been impressed with af so far on the d3 with the af-d version, color rendition is awesome, and bokeh is of course legendary ....guess one of those cases where getting the old used worked out wiser than new retail?

    I also recently had my swm die on my 50 1.4afs at a wedding-took 12 days for nikon to repair, but I missed a lot of shots...that's laregly what inspired me to go old school and rely on the af of my d3 rather than trust the swm again....

    Posted 2 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

« Previous12

Reply

You must log in to post.

NikonRumors Forum (http://nikonrumors.com/forum) is proudly powered by bbPress
Disclaimer: This site has no affiliation with Nikon USA or any other subsidiary of Nikon. Please visit the official Nikon website at nikon.com
Copyright © 2008-2011 NikonRumors.com