LOL - this is so stupid. I've lost some respect for Jodie Foster.
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/37649591/ns/today-entertainment/
OMG - Are you a Papparazzo, too?
(10 posts) (7 voices)-
Posted 2 years ago #
-
I don't know, I think I'm on Jodie's side. The kid had to have been annoying as hell for her to confront him like that. If he wasn't a paparazzi I'm sure the D3S his mom bought him and the fact he was following her around makes me think he deserved a good bruising. That'll learn him :^)
Posted 2 years ago # -
Yeah, I think I mighta busted him up a bit, too, if he was crowding me and my kids. But to claim he was a PappaZ becaue he had a big camera and a long lense is laughable.
Posted 2 years ago # -
The kid is lucky it wasn't me he was harassing. I have very little tolerance for that kind of behavior. When I take someones picture I generally get their permission before or after. If after I will immediatly delete the picture if they ask. I like taking pictures of kids being kids, and with the sensitivity of the subject I always ask parents permission.
Posted 2 years ago # -
He had a long lens and was crowding her? What was he shooting for? A nose wart?
Seriously, no person has a right to privacy in public places. That includes people who earn they money by being idolized by their fans. If they don't want people following them and taking pictures of them, then they need to stay out of site, or give up their career.
Can't have fans when you want their money and have them ignore you when you want your privacy in public places.
Posted 2 years ago # -
JorPet said:
He had a long lens and was crowding her? What was he shooting for? A nose wart?Seriously, no person has a right to privacy in public places. That includes people who earn they money by being idolized by their fans. If they don't want people following them and taking pictures of them, then they need to stay out of site, or give up their career.
Can't have fans when you want their money and have them ignore you when you want your privacy in public places.
are you saying that if you choose to be an actor you have to give up the right to being able to enjoy yourself in public without being constantly photographed?
lol that seems a bit harsh to me.
Posted 2 years ago # -
JorPet said:
He had a long lens and was crowding her? What was he shooting for? A nose wart?For a person not really into photography (or is she?) a 24-70 might also look like tele lens.
I do agree that when people choose to lead a life of a celebrity they have to agree to some sort of public attention, but having jerks who will go out of their way to get a picture of you on the toilet, etc. isn't really what they should have to tolerate.
In addition there are mentally unstable unpredictable fans who might want the celebrity all to themselves. At one point Jodie Foster's career in acting was pulled to a halt by one of those: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hinckley,_Jr.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Agree - when a person expects millions for being a fan favorite, they have to expect some loss of privacy - but the PappaZ crap about getting photos of people in their back yards, or "private" moments is crossing the line.
Posted 2 years ago # -
[Jonny jumps on his vespa and speeds away from the pitchfork-bearing forum members]
Posted 2 years ago # -
Uhh, Jonny, that whan't you who Little Miss Foster busted up, was it?
Posted 2 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.
