So I am looking to upgrade from my D40, looking on my local craigslist I see a couple options:
D200 with 14k Actuations, body in great shape.. asking 550 (body only)
D300 with 50k Actuations, body in great shape.. asking 875 (body only)
I've done a bit of research and got the gist of the differences down I think (LV, Sensor Type, High ISO Performance, Better LCD Screen..maybe others..).
Usage: Landscape, CityScape Long Exposures, some wildlife. I'm really not going to be doing a lot of low light shooting...
Question: Considering the actuations, is the D300 REALLY going to be worth the extra $$ or the money saved going for the d200 better spend on some better glass??
btw for either camera, any glass suggestions? I've compiled this list to start with:
Nikon 50mm 1.8
Sigma 18-250 OS HSM
Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM Lens
I won't lie, I'm getting pretty excited at the prospect of more\cheaper glass options with either of the two above cameras over the D40...
Anyways, thanks in advance for any input!