Looking for for a very good 300+ lens « Nikon Rumors Forum

The new Nikon Rumors Forum is now live at http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussions. This forum is now in "read only" mode until I figure a proper way to import all data over to the new platform. Please register over at the new forum.


Nikon Rumors Forum

where there’s smoke there’s forum fire

Register or log in - lost password?

Nikon Rumors Forum » Nikon Lenses

Looking for for a very good 300+ lens

(31 posts) (11 voices)
  • Started 3 years ago by noxin
  • Latest reply from adamz
  • Related Topics:
    1. How do I know which are good Nikon lenses?
    2. Looking for a beginner macro lens for Nikon D3100
    3. I'm new here, I need your help. Which lens is good for D7000?
    4. Everyday lens with a D5000 (Or Any DX Camera)?
    5. Can anyone tell me how to disassemble a nikon AI lens?

Tags:

No tags yet.

« Previous12
  1. PB PM

    preferred member
    Joined: Jan '10
    Posts: 2,217

    offline

    I don't think that is the current version, does your have a push and pull zoom or a zoom ring? They all look very similar too, which makes it tough unless you know the small differences.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  2. JorPet

    preferred member
    Joined: Feb '10
    Posts: 261

    offline

    noxin said:
    .
    .
    .
    JorPet, I made the same upgrade as you D70 --> D700. I have the 80-200 AF ED lens and it still feels slow. Do you know how that focus would compare with the 80-400? Why do you think you would prefere the 70-200 with the converter over the 80-400?
    .
    .
    .

    I have a friend who has the previous version of the 70-200 and shoots with a D3s. Having used that lens it is both sharper and faster focusing than the 80-400. Most skiing shots can be taken at 200mm without a problem, focus speed and sharpness are bigger issues. I would then carry the converter if I ever had an issue where I thought I need more reach going to 120-340 (with the 1.7) would be fine and only drop to f4.8 through the full range.

    This is not to say that I don't like the 80-400. It is a good lens and on the D700 it is fast enough focusing to be able to track skiers in multiple shot bursts, even out to 400mm. Just could be better.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  3. kyoshinikon

    preferred member
    Joined: Jan '10
    Posts: 1,200

    offline

    The 80-200 mm F/2.8 AF (push and pull) is still pretty slow even on the D700 (I use the lens every single day) in comparison to the Vr1 70-200mm f/2.8... Not as slow as the kit 55-200mm Dx though

    Posted 3 years ago #
  4. PB PM

    preferred member
    Joined: Jan '10
    Posts: 2,217

    offline

    Yeah the early push and pull versions is the slowest of the 80-200mm F2.8D lenses, while the currently selling 80-200mm AF-D ED is the fastest.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  5. heartyfisher

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,701

    offline

    Re the 120-300 sigma.. It reviews very well. in terms of Zooms in this range it probably is the best. Thats why the price is so high. I would still go for a 300 F4 nikkor prime over that Zoom.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  6. adamz

    The Predator
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 3,461

    offline

    actually the 120-300/2.8 is a good option - when You close it down to f4 You get a decent quality shots (I would say very comparable to 300/4 wide open), it also handles quite well... the only thing that annoys me is the fact that the barrel twists in opposite direction as the nikon ones (canon style).

    Posted 3 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

« Previous12

Reply

You must log in to post.

NikonRumors Forum (http://nikonrumors.com/forum) is proudly powered by bbPress
Disclaimer: This site has no affiliation with Nikon USA or any other subsidiary of Nikon. Please visit the official Nikon website at nikon.com
Copyright © 2008-2011 NikonRumors.com