DX wide angle lenses « Nikon Rumors Forum

The new Nikon Rumors Forum is now live at http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussions. This forum is now in "read only" mode until I figure a proper way to import all data over to the new platform. Please register over at the new forum.


Nikon Rumors Forum

where there’s smoke there’s forum fire

Register or log in - lost password?

Nikon Rumors Forum » Nikon DSLR

DX wide angle lenses

(16 posts) (12 voices)
  • Started 3 years ago by Labradorman
  • Latest reply from ted2001
  • Related Topics:
    1. How do I know which are good Nikon lenses?
    2. 18-200mm filters
    3. Could a D300s replacement have a 1.4 crop factor and work with present DX lenses
    4. How things have stayed the same: From a camera review from 1999
    5. What was the moment you realized that you needed to move up to FX?

Tags:

No tags yet.

  1. Labradorman

    new member
    Joined: Feb '10
    Posts: 1

    offline

    I am interested in adding a good quality DX wide angle lens to my collection to use with my D80 camera. My existing lenses are 50mm 1.8, 16-85mmVR and 70-300mmVR. I have a interest in landscape and wide angle photography. I have a strict budget around 1000.00 and wanted to know what my options are. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  2. NSXType-R

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 2,803

    offline

    Nikkor 12-24 or 10-24. I hear the Tokinas are good though.

    I don't own any of those lenses though.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  3. PB PM

    preferred member
    Joined: Jan '10
    Posts: 2,217

    offline

    The Nikon 12-24mm and Tokina 12-24mm F4 DX lenses are good, about par, with the Tokina costing a lot less.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  4. adamz

    The Predator
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 3,461

    offline

    labradorman - welcome to the forum, please do a search on this forum, as this topic has been recently discussed

    Posted 3 years ago #
  5. Henry Nikon Fan

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 152

    offline

    I own the 10-24mm and use it on my D300 and love it. I have several other Nikkors, but the 10-24mm stays on my body almost half the time. I use 2 other primes, 18-200mm most of the other time. I have the 70-300mm VR, but I do not use it much.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  6. jonnyapple

    Goldfingers
    Joined: May '09
    Posts: 3,400

    offline

    Search is hard to use on this site sometimes. Here's the thread Adam's talking about:
    http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=142
    edit: on second glance, that's not it. I'll look some more.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  7. jonnyapple

    Goldfingers
    Joined: May '09
    Posts: 3,400

    offline

    Here we go:
    http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=604

    Posted 3 years ago #
  8. shivaswrath

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 841

    offline

    OMG, please search OP, Tokina 11-16 2.8 (rant rave rave rant). . .

    Posted 3 years ago #
  9. Willis

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 1,123

    offline

    If I were looking for the old thread, I wouldn't have found it.

    I recommend the Tokina 11-16. Especially since you already have the 16-85.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  10. ted2001

    preferred member
    Joined: Jul '09
    Posts: 726

    offline

    I've also got the 16-85 and 70-300. I very highly recommend Nikon's 10-24.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  11. Graphicnatured

    senior member
    Joined: Jan '10
    Posts: 89

    offline

    As I said in another thread, I triple the Tokina 11-16. Absolutely love it.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  12. shivaswrath

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 841

    offline

    I would not recommend the 10-24 Nikon - over priced, slow, and soft. . .yawn. . .

    Posted 3 years ago #
  13. stm93

    member
    Joined: Feb '10
    Posts: 22

    offline

    Tokina 11-16 here, no contest

    Posted 3 years ago #
  14. SquamishPhoto

    preferred member
    Joined: Feb '10
    Posts: 1,076

    offline

    I just sold my 12-24DX because I upgraded to FX. The lens was awesome while I used it. Took some amazing landscapes with it. Just sold it to my brother for $600, so you could look at the 12-24 as good option used since its easy to find cheap.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  15. ted2001

    preferred member
    Joined: Jul '09
    Posts: 726

    offline

    I've got the 10-24 and differ about it's sharpness. Mine is excellent. The Tokina might also be an excellent lens, but it is more limited in it's application. The Nikon has very fast auto-focus and zooms to 36mm making it usable for more than just ultra-wide shooting. I find mine very handy for street shooting in close quarters, like San Francisco's China Town.

    Whether or not you like Ken Rockwell (I can now hear the roars), he has a good discussion of theses two lenses. He likes them both.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  16. ted2001

    preferred member
    Joined: Jul '09
    Posts: 726

    offline

    btw, the Tokina is in stock at both Adorama and B&H. $600, but the 77mm multi-coated B&W filter in thin mount is $116.

    Posted 3 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.

NikonRumors Forum (http://nikonrumors.com/forum) is proudly powered by bbPress
Disclaimer: This site has no affiliation with Nikon USA or any other subsidiary of Nikon. Please visit the official Nikon website at nikon.com
Copyright © 2008-2011 NikonRumors.com