Because the D3x is a 24mp camera that is 7500. If nikon releases a d800 at 24 mp and has better iso. It is a kick in the ass of all those photographers who paid 7-8 grand on the d3x. I'm thinking the D400 will be a mini d3s at 2500 but the d800 under the rumors to cost more as a mini d3x
D800 Coming In Feb 2010
(57 posts) (31 voices)-
Posted 2 years ago #
-
It may be a kick in the pants for D3x users, but then they have a higher end camera. They've also had that sensor for almost two years now. Technology and time march on, such is life. That's like saying D2X users got a kick in the pants when the D300 came out.
Posted 2 years ago # -
I mean it can be. But i doubt at the price of 2000-or 2500. Id say close to 3grand. and have the D400 in the 1800-2100 range as a FX camera
Posted 2 years ago # -
Since the D300s is basically replaced by a 1200$ camera
Posted 2 years ago # -
People who bought a D3X don't tend to get kicked in the pants by such developments. They just buy the next best thing as soon as its released and then go on with their rather fortunate lives. ;]
Posted 2 years ago # -
-
Im going with the d900 in 2012.
Just straight skipping the 800 to mess with all the people on NRPosted 2 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.
