No Mirror Lock-up on D90 « Nikon Rumors Forum

The new Nikon Rumors Forum is now live at http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussions. This forum is now in "read only" mode until I figure a proper way to import all data over to the new platform. Please register over at the new forum.


Nikon Rumors Forum

where there’s smoke there’s forum fire

Register or log in - lost password?

Nikon Rumors Forum » Nikon DSLR

No Mirror Lock-up on D90

(18 posts) (7 voices)
  • Started 3 years ago by ted2001
  • Latest reply from alphanikonrex
  • Related Topics:
    1. Cleaning my mirror/focus screen
    2. New Pellix Mirror Patent Filed By Sony
    3. Dirty Sensor from New on D600?
    4. PHOTO-A-DAY: October 2012
    5. D5100 users, viewfinder to sensor misalignment, how many of you?

Tags:

No tags yet.

  1. ted2001

    preferred member
    Joined: Jul '09
    Posts: 726

    offline

    I just noticed that you can only lock-up the mirror on a D90 to clean the sensor. I always used mirror lock-up with F3 for long exposures and was surprised not to have the feature in my D90. I wonder if it could be implemented through a s/w or f/w upgrade? or another reason to buy D300s (along with better use of AIS lenses).

    Posted 3 years ago #
  2. mb

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,160

    offline

    Exposure Delay Mode gives similar results ... and it is easier to use

    Posted 3 years ago #
  3. kellenfreeman

    preferred member
    Joined: Sep '09
    Posts: 128

    offline

    Wait, I don't understand. What is the advantage of this?

    Posted 3 years ago #
  4. mb

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,160

    offline

    What is the advantage of what?

    Posted 3 years ago #
  5. alphanikonrex

    I'm under 18!
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,999

    offline

    kellenfreeman said:
    Wait, I don't understand. What is the advantage of this?

    In mirror lock-up mode, the camera's mirror goes up first, and then the shutter opens to reduce blur with long exposures.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  6. ted2001

    preferred member
    Joined: Jul '09
    Posts: 726

    offline

    The reflex mirror on an SLR is a source of vibration. Most people who shoot rangefinders feel they can get about one shutter speed better performance than an SLR because of the mirror. Locking the mirror up reduces vibration.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  7. mb

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,160

    offline

    ted2001 said:
    The reflex mirror on an SLR is a source of vibration. Most people who shoot rangefinders feel they can get about one shutter speed better performance than an SLR because of the mirror. Locking the mirror up reduces vibration.

    So does Exposure Delay Mode, it brings mirror up, waits for vibrations to set down and then fires the shutter.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  8. alphanikonrex

    I'm under 18!
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,999

    offline

    Actually I use exposure delay mode instead of mirror lockup. Not as quick to access, but its faster than waiting 30 seconds for my D300 to take a picture as I don't have a cable release.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  9. mb

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,160

    offline

    I use both, remote control and Exposure Delay Mode.
    You could shorten the self-timer delay ...

    Posted 3 years ago #
  10. jonnyapple

    Goldfingers
    Joined: May '09
    Posts: 3,400

    offline

    alphanikonrex said:
    In mirror lock-up mode, the camera's mirror goes up first, and then the shutter opens to reduce blur with long exposures.

    Alpha, that's mostly right. It depends on your tripod how long it takes for the vibrations from the mirror to go away but for long exposures (>5s is a conservative number), mirror lockup is less important than for exposures in the 1/4s range. It's because if the shutter is open 10 times as long as it takes for the vibrations to go away, you get almost all the light for your exposure from a shake-free camera.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  11. alphanikonrex

    I'm under 18!
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,999

    offline

    mb said:
    You could shorten the self-timer delay ...

    But then I forget and mess up later when I'm trying to take a self-portrait or something :^)

    Posted 3 years ago #
  12. mb

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,160

    offline

    alphanikonrex said:
    But then I forget and mess up later when I'm trying to take a self-portrait or something :^)

    Or you can get the remote, not too expensive I think and it makes much difference when shooting from a tripod 8)

    Posted 3 years ago #
  13. alphanikonrex

    I'm under 18!
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,999

    offline

    mb said:
    Or you can get the remote, not too expensive I think and it makes much difference when shooting from a tripod 8)

    $50 for a wired remote is annoying compared to the good ol' ML-L3.

    Oh, what are the significant differences between the MC-30 and the MC-36? Anything particularly useful?

    Posted 3 years ago #
  14. nikyvee

    senior member
    Joined: Aug '09
    Posts: 83

    offline

    Wait a minute, guys. As a expectant D90 owner, let me get this straight. Now how do you do the long exposure method? Btw, in addition to the D90, I am getting the ML-L3 remote controller.

    TIA,
    Nick V

    Posted 3 years ago #
  15. ted2001

    preferred member
    Joined: Jul '09
    Posts: 726

    offline

    I played around this afternoon and am satisfied with both approachs. The ML-L3 works perfectly, as does delay. Just makes an old dog learn new tricks. Arrff.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  16. Bibz

    new member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 4

    offline

    I have a D90, expose delay works great. It might not wait as long as the mirror lockup before it opens the shutter (i'd say it waits about 2 seconds) but it enough for most of the vibration to die.

    By the way, instead of buying the official expensive wireless remote, you might want to take a look here : http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.6236

    Much cheaper and it works.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  17. ted2001

    preferred member
    Joined: Jul '09
    Posts: 726

    offline

    I paid about $18 for the Nikon ML-L3, seemed pretty reasonable to me. Even comes in a little case.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  18. alphanikonrex

    I'm under 18!
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,999

    offline

    ted2001 said:
    I paid about $18 for the Nikon ML-L3, seemed pretty reasonable to me. Even comes in a little case.

    I got mine for about the same price. Too bad it doesn't work with the D300 :^(

    Posted 3 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.

NikonRumors Forum (http://nikonrumors.com/forum) is proudly powered by bbPress
Disclaimer: This site has no affiliation with Nikon USA or any other subsidiary of Nikon. Please visit the official Nikon website at nikon.com
Copyright © 2008-2011 NikonRumors.com