alphanikonrex said:
I was looking at his portraits again and I noticed he cuts off the heads many times in his composition. Anybody know what's up with that?
Emphasizes the face. (and not the $500 haircut).
where there’s smoke there’s forum fire
Camera used? Check out the Platons' Portraits, Movies, Matt Damon. Camera is in the reflection. Doesn't look like a Hassey to me.
Platon used a Leica when he took photos of Putin for Time Magazine's Man of the Year, according to Platon's interview about the photo shoot http://www.worldpressphoto.org/images/stories/videos/Interviews2009/index.php
soap said:
Emphasizes the face. (and not the $500 haircut).
Makes sense to me. Also maybe to get in the clothes while keeping the frame tight?
warprints said:
Platon used a Leica when he took photos of Putin for Time Magazine's Man of the Year, according to Platon's interview about the photo shoot http://www.worldpressphoto.org/images/stories/videos/Interviews2009/index.php
Listen to the interview. Platon is brilliant.
(Oh yeah, go to the link warprints posted ➤ 2008 Awards ➤ Look for Putin's Picture. If you don't want to listen to the whole thing then I would listen from 5 minutes on.)
Warprints, Platon uses Hasselblad cameras. I think he uses the same 555ELD or similar EL Series Hassey for all his portraits. He's well know for using Hasselblads. The portrait of Putin was in fact taken with a Hasselblad camera. If you listen carefully to the interview you posted, Platon does say he picks up his Leica.
However, he did so to shoot documentary style photos while he was waiting for the Time reporter to finish his interview with Putin. The portrait session was done with a Hasselblad. If you look at the link in alpha's first post to the New Yorker Portfolio the last picture is of him shooting Tony Blair with his Hasselblad.
NSXType-R said:
Really?In the short audio clips in the second link, he asks them to sit down, and I would assume he has something set up around the chair.
Jeez OK sit stand whatever. The point is he catches these world leaders very quickly. Again if you look at the last photo in the New Yorker Portfolio you will see that his "studio" is against a wall in a some kind of corridor. One or two strobes, his Hasselblad and that's it.
NikoDoby said:
Warprints, Platon uses Hasselblad cameras. I think he uses the same 555ELD or similar EL Series Hassey for all his portraits. He's well know for using Hasselblads. The portrait of Putin was in fact taken with a Hasselblad camera. If you listen carefully to the interview you posted, Platon does say he picks up his Leica.However, he did so to shoot documentary style photos while he was waiting for the Time reporter to finish his interview with Putin. The portrait session was done with a Hasselblad. If you look at the link in alpha's first post to the New Yorker Portfolio the last picture is of him shooting Tony Blair with his Hasselblad.
Jeez OK sit stand whatever. The point is he catches these world leaders very quickly. Again if you look at the last photo in the New Yorker Portfolio you will see that his "studio" is against a wall in a some kind of corridor. One or two strobes, his Hasselblad and that's it.
Okay okay. :D
He I know he has very short times with them, but nonetheless he does have a bit of a setup.
Interesting guy and interesting work, however, the more I look at it the less I like the work. Wide-angle portrait shots, no background or halo background. His style rather formulaic and seems somehow to disregard the subject.
Ted, I tend to agree, but that style is his "hook". For many portraits, it works - Jesse James (not cowboy, but motorcyle guy) would look good in this style, but I don't think the queen of England would come across too well.
More hook than substance, but a career making hook none-the-less. I think that's Queen (and I agree).
I don't know how much I'm admiring his photographic skill.
I'm admiring his social skill. He became "equal" with Putin. That is quite a feat!
Platon was born and brought up in London, he is of Greek descent but is by all accounts British, he studied photography at the Royal College of Art, I met him once years ago before his career took off in the USA. He uses mainly film, scans it and tweeks it on photo shop. I think there are quite a few photographers, myself included, who learnt about photography in the old days before digital, I would say the digital versus film debate is over, I mean its a bit like debating whether working with water colours is better than working with oil paints, its just different in my view, each has their advantages. I like digital, its a fantastic medium, I also like film. Platon uses black and white film and in that equation to achieve his desired result is his choice of film and how it is developed, simple lighting and a unique focal length lens which I think he prefers not to reveal, Im thinking it could be a modified lens, at first glance it looks like a normal wide angle or a fisheye but its very difficult to achieve those perspectives with commercially available lenses,its quite unique and I haven't seem anyone who has been able to successfully copy that and plenty have tried. Im reminded of the nudes by Bill Brandt which were taken with a camera which looked like a fisheye or wide angle, except it wasn't, I interviewed Bill Brandt in 1983 shortly before he died and he still owned the camera which he used for his distorted nudes, it had a lens that he had modified himself so it was unique to his style of photography and so impossible to emulate really, and that is how he liked it!!
You must log in to post.