Nikkor 50 1.8 « Nikon Rumors Forum

The new Nikon Rumors Forum is now live at http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussions. This forum is now in "read only" mode until I figure a proper way to import all data over to the new platform. Please register over at the new forum.


Nikon Rumors Forum

where there’s smoke there’s forum fire

Register or log in - lost password?

Nikon Rumors Forum » Nikon Lenses

Nikkor 50 1.8

(44 posts) (12 voices)
  • Started 4 years ago by Connor Broaddus
  • Latest reply from NSXType-R
  • Related Topics:
    1. Just acquired two new Nikkor lenses!
    2. UWA for D7000 - used nikkor or used tokina - 12-24?
    3. Can I use my older Nikkors in a Panasonic GF2 (instead of a Nikon D700)?
    4. Nikkor 17-55 f/2.8 and Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 comparison
    5. Nikkor 24-70 availability

Tags:

  • 50 1.8
  • halloween outlet
  • nikkor
« Previous12
  1. trigger2007

    new member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 2

    offline

    Using the 50mm 1.4 - Awesome, cant say much more. Depth of field control is excellent, great bokeh.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  2. Connor Broaddus

    senior member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 66

    offline

    Thanks trigger2007.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  3. JMCS

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 110

    offline

    I'd go for the 35mm f/1.8. Anyone here remember the test shots of the D3 - in no crop modes, and the 35mm DX? There was falloff, but It look like it may have been intended as a full-frame lens, and then redesigned as a DX lens.

    My $0.02

    Posted 4 years ago #
  4. nemezote

    junior member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 9

    offline

    Id get the 35mm. It can AF on the D40 and its a normal 50mm lens after the 1.5 multiplier is applied.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  5. Connor Broaddus

    senior member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 66

    offline

    actually, since the 35 is made for DX, it's intended as a DX lens, meaning 35mm is 35mm period.

    I think...

    Posted 4 years ago #
  6. Connor Broaddus

    senior member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 66

    offline

    I've actually ended up going with the 50mm. I'll let you know how it goes for me and have some photos posted up soon enough, thank's for all the advice.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  7. adamz

    The Predator
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 3,461

    offline

    "actually, since the 35 is made for DX, it's intended as a DX lens, meaning 35mm is 35mm period."
    35mm lens is actually 52.5mm on DX, as the lens focal range is always displayed according to standard frame, doesn't matter either You use DX, APS, P&S or any other format.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  8. Connor Broaddus

    senior member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 66

    offline

    Oh. Wow, I feel stupid. Hahah.

    Thank you though.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  9. NSXType-R

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 2,803

    offline

    35mm is 52.5 because of the crop factor right?

    I never understood why there was a crop factor. Sure, the sensor is smaller and all, but it doesn't make much sense to me still.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  10. ChrisLange

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 359

    offline

    Look at it this way, if the sensor is smaller, there is less space being covered in light from the lens' image circle. Say any given lens provides you a 45 degree angle of view, that's on a full frame of 35mm film, or an FX sensor, project that same image onto a DX sensor, the same distance from the back of the lens, only a portion of that 45 degree field of view will be used. This is the same reason why a 35mm lens in medium format is ultra-wide, equivalent to about a 17mm lens in 35mm format, or a 11mm in DX

    Posted 4 years ago #
  11. NSXType-R

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 2,803

    offline

    Ah, I see. Makes more sense now.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  12. mb

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,160

    offline

    Actually 35mm is always 35mm, just as 50mm is always 50mm. The picture projected at the same distance from the so called nodal plain (center of the lens) will always be the same, but the diagonal on the sensor or the film frame is different in DX, FX or else, so the angle of view from the nodal plain (which depends on focal length) will be different. If this focal length is equal to a diagonal of the image (sensor in our case) that angle is 45º. Angle of 50º to 55º is considered to be equal to human eye, and it is so considered normal angle (50mm lens on FX 43mm diagonal and 35mm lens on DX 28mm diagonal will approximately make this angle). Anything wider than this (with shorter focal length) is therefore considered wide, and anything with smaller angle of view is considered long lens. Normal lens were always considered boring and were not used by most professionals, and 35 is probably the most used all-around length (about the same as 24 on DX).
    What really amazes me about this post is how much waves a little 50 f/1.8 lens (40 years old design with AF added just a couple of, well, decades or so ago) is making. And it is still sharper and optically better overall than the newest child of the most modern design such as this 35 f/1.8.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  13. Connor Broaddus

    senior member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 66

    offline

    Hey guys, I just got a chance to take pictures with my new lens, the Nikkor 50mm f1.8,

    Flower

    If you want to see more, go to http://www.flickr.com/connorbroaddusphotography

    thanks for all the advice and information, it's very appreciated. :)

    Posted 4 years ago #
  14. Willis

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 1,123

    offline

    Hey Connor nice shots. Go edit your post to drop the period from your link, its causing it to come up unfound. Glad you like the lens. For $100, its a no brainier. I'd still pick up the 35mm when you can get the scratch together, its a great lens.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  15. Connor Broaddus

    senior member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 66

    offline

    Thanks willis.

    Alright, it should work now.

    Yeah, I'm planning on that, i'm pretty much addicted to primes now.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  16. NSXType-R

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 2,803

    offline

    Just wondering, does the old 50mm 1.8 D have a plastic mount or a metal mount?

    Posted 4 years ago #
  17. Connor Broaddus

    senior member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 66

    offline

    It's a metal mount. Rockwell has a whole reveiw on it.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  18. mb

    preferred member
    Joined: Apr '09
    Posts: 1,160

    offline

    All old Nikon lenses have metal mount, Nikon has gone plastic just recently.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  19. NSXType-R

    preferred member
    Joined: Mar '09
    Posts: 2,803

    offline

    Alright, thanks.

    Posted 4 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

« Previous12

Reply

You must log in to post.

NikonRumors Forum (http://nikonrumors.com/forum) is proudly powered by bbPress
Disclaimer: This site has no affiliation with Nikon USA or any other subsidiary of Nikon. Please visit the official Nikon website at nikon.com
Copyright © 2008-2011 NikonRumors.com