Anyone have an opinion on this? I currently own a Nikon d60, and a Nikon F100. I will be using this lens on My F100, for indoor sports, so the fact that the 80-200mm dosn't have a motor isn't imperative. Reviews seem to be excellent for both, but I am questioning the durability of the 70-200mm. But the 70-200 is cheaper...
Sigma 70-200mm vs. Nikon 80-200mm?
(3 posts) (3 voices)-
Posted 4 years ago #
-
The problem is that sigma don't catch sharpness,some 6/10 sharpness is somewhere else
Nikkor is 2/10 sharp. Both have good MTF50 but i i were you i would change D60 to D90 and buy nikkorPosted 4 years ago # -
this topic was already discussed, search the forum
Posted 4 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.
