I was curious to know you guy's opinion on the merits of the new 70-200 VR II vs. the older 2003 70-200. I'm pretty close to pulling the trigger. Here's my dilemma: 1. I don't own a FX camera. 2. If I did own an FX camera, I'd almost certainly be using my 24-70 lens on it, with the 70-200 on a second (DX) body. 3. If I owned 2 FX bodies, I still would probably use the 70-200 on a DX body because it's reach I'm after (My 105mm can fill in for the times that I need a sharp tele lens without reach).
Knowing that, is there any reason to invest in the new 70-200?