<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: Nikon 70- 200 F/2.8 VR or VRII</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=7881</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=7881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>msmoto on "Nikon 70- 200 F/2.8 VR or VRII"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=7881#post-107149</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>msmoto</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">107149@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Please do a search before starting threads.</p>
<p>This is covered here</p>
<p><a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4218" rel="nofollow">http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4218</a>
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>framer on "Nikon 70- 200 F/2.8 VR or VRII"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=7881#post-107148</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>framer</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">107148@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Are you using it for DX or FX?</p>
<p>If DX buy the VR and save the money.  I have the VR and it works perfect for 98% of my FX needs. Only going slightly soft in the corners.  If you crop to an 4x5 format you're fine.  Add a TC14E II and you good in the corners on FX.  The older VR is still a great lens.</p>
<p>framer
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>sevencrossing on "Nikon 70- 200 F/2.8 VR or VRII"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=7881#post-107146</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>sevencrossing</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">107146@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I have the VRII and have never had any problems. If you can afford it, get a new VRII, it is one of Nikon best  lenses. If you are short of cash the original VR is by all   accounts  an excellent lens but try it first, you  can never be sure of its history
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>epthomas on "Nikon 70- 200 F/2.8 VR or VRII"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=7881#post-107139</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>epthomas</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">107139@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I am looking at purchasing a used Nikkor 70-200 /2.8.  My question is, should I go for the older VR or the newer VRII.  I have read about the focal length issues with the VRII and also the older VR version is cheaper on EBay than VRII.  Any recommendations are appreciated.
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
