So pretty much you're selling me a lens cap, a body cap and a manual? I've always wanted a vintage lens cap!

Deal!

Hey, what! Ok, fine. I accept Master Card, Visa, and American Express. ;^)

"Everything included in original packaging except for camera body." :^)

The Pani GF-1 is practically a first of it's kind, however it is a great first. If I was a camera nut with a lot of money, then I would get one. But since I'm a camera nut with not very much money I will have to pass.

These mirror-less interchangeable lens camera's are an awesome concept, and each year they will only get better.

alpha's got an F2 he'll sell you for fitty bucks NSX ;^)

What the hell do you mean lucked out? Nikon never said they'd stop making film cameras, and that's what I'm assuming too. I'm looking forward for a F7 with 51 point autofocus points!

That means I can pick up a F6 for cheap!

Yes, that one of my big questions!

Nikon lucked out with the F's, as they died out at the F6.

It looks like somebody's going to have to come up with technology better than digital, as otherwise Nikon's screwed!

That's the advantage of the Canon naming system, though it will eventually get annoying: 5D Mark MMMMCMXCIX

Haha, what happens with the D3 reaches the D9? Does it eventually go to D40 again? :D

It will happen sooner than you think alpha :^(

Bright frame finders are perfect (non-macro/long lens), mirrors are very good (no exceptions), but those others are indeed evil.

LOL, I can just imagine myself saying "sigh those were the good old days" 50 years from now when everyone is discussing the brand new Dx! ;^)

Then I can complain about missing my rangefinder AND DSLR cameras....sigh those where the good ol days.

Honestly, I'm not into the EP-1 or the GF1. I tried an EP-1 and it was way too slow for my liking. DSLR for now at least.

Future in my opinion does not belong to SLR, as the technology evolves I am sure they will be replaced with cameras similar to Panasonic GF1.
They will probably have electronic viewfinders along with live–view and with highly sensitive sensors and high resolution LCD screens you will be able to see better even at almost complete darkness.
Without moving parts, especially heavy mirror, you will have no vibrations, fewer mechanical malfunctions, lower weight, faster FPS and closer lens to sensor distance which means less retro–focus problems such as distortion and better IQ with wide lenses.

Yes I too miss the rangefinder days :^( I was thinking of getting the GF1 for my wife but we'll see what Olympus announces with the EP2 on October 30.

Having enjoyed shooting the Contax G2 rangefinder, I prefer them to SLRs for everything except macro/copy and long lens photography. But, that's predicated on a bright rangefinder, not some evil thing on the back of the camera. The advantages of a rangefinder were 1) bright finder with frame lines (you see around the scene and stay in touch - no mirror black-out) 2) because there is no mirror, lenses can be designed differently for improved performance at smaller sizes 3) smaller body, less obtrusive, quieter (no mirror) and lighter. Putting SLR lenses on a rangefinder doesn't make sense to me, nor do cameras without optical viewfinders. I would love an M-9 or a digital G2 (I don't hold out hope for either).

If I had gotten into rangefinders before I owned a decent film SLR I might have loved them, but as it is now I can't imagine switching.

Nikon F80 + 35 f2 is small enough for me, clearly not a pocket camera but I don't wear baggy enough jeans to pocket a rangefinder either.

If Nikon came out with a rangefinder now I don't know why I would buy it. Until there is a revolution in sensor tech my wife and I are happy enough with her Canon P&S, and I don't need yet another camera. (and don't mention F-mount lenses - I'll bet all takers $100 there will not be a F-mount rangefinder) (email @ soapssuckerbet@cleansoap.org if you want to participate in the bet)
;)

DpReview was sure smitten with the new Panasonic GF1, special when used with the 20mm pancake lens.

What is your thoughts about a camera like this one and would you use it with a 20mm lens(app 28mm DX, 40mm FX)

And would you like to see Nikon make one, if so should it be micro4/3 or micro APS-C format

Pete