<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: New 28 1.4</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=67</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 06:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=67" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>EdEnd on "New 28 1.4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=67#post-1543</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>EdEnd</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">1543@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>a 28/1.4 would sure be nice to have.... but probably too expensive for the amount of times I use it. I guess I'll stick with the 2.8 zoom for those occasions and just boost the iso :)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>LSE on "New 28 1.4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=67#post-1051</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 10:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LSE</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">1051@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I hope it is true. if nikon made AF-S versions of the nearly decade old 28 f/1.4 and 85 f/1.4 I'd place my order today.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>heartyfisher on "New 28 1.4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=67#post-656</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 07:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>heartyfisher</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">656@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I was thinking DX format.. sorry... since a DX 28mm is similar to 42mm FX It would be really nice to get a DX F1.4 28mm with 52mm filter size..</p>
<p>However, even with FX format .... hmm  ... thinking.... hmm....  may be its because of the extra space between the sensor and the lens where the mirror box is.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>tai on "New 28 1.4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=67#post-654</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 07:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tai</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">654@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>@heartyfisher, I'm guessing because of the wide field of view you need a larger filter size to prevent blocking the image with the filter which would cause vignetting.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>heartyfisher on "New 28 1.4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=67#post-651</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 07:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>heartyfisher</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">651@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>wonder why a 28 mm 1.4 needs to have 77/72mm filter size when a 50mm 1.4 needs only a 52mm filter size..???
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>HotDuckZ on "New 28 1.4"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=67#post-646</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>HotDuckZ</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">646@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p><a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&#038;message=31489736" rel="nofollow">http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&#038;message=31489736</a>
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
