<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: Nikon TC-17E III &amp; Nikon TC-14E III rumors</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=6440</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=6440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>msmoto on "Nikon TC-17E III &amp; Nikon TC-14E III rumors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=6440#post-99722</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 06:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>msmoto</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">99722@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Incidentally...another 70-200 plus the TC-20EIII on PAD yesterday,<br />
The 2000px version is here:   <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/fantinesfotos/7447148346/sizes/o/in/photostream/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/fantinesfotos/7447148346/sizes/o/in/photostream/</a>
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>E_ADLER on "Nikon TC-17E III &amp; Nikon TC-14E III rumors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=6440#post-99698</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>E_ADLER</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">99698@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Thanks all :)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ronin.1 on "Nikon TC-17E III &amp; Nikon TC-14E III rumors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=6440#post-98784</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ronin.1</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">98784@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I would like to see the 1.7 TC brought up-to-date with nano coatings &#38; etc. </p>
<p>I have a 70-200 f2.8 VRII with a 1.4 TC II that work well on my D7K, but I would like to stretch things a bit more and think the 1.7 probably would be more flexible than the 2, the 2 is a more recent refresh.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>msmoto on "Nikon TC-17E III &amp; Nikon TC-14E III rumors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=6440#post-98560</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>msmoto</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">98560@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>For the TC-20EIII on 70-200mm f/2.8 VRII go here</p>
<p><a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2226" rel="nofollow">http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2226</a></p>
<p>I put up another example today
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>aznick on "Nikon TC-17E III &amp; Nikon TC-14E III rumors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=6440#post-98556</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>aznick</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">98556@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Thanks sevencrossing, I'll search for the thread.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>sevencrossing on "Nikon TC-17E III &amp; Nikon TC-14E III rumors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=6440#post-98551</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>sevencrossing</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">98551@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>aznick <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=6440#post-98540">said</a>:</cite><br />
I'm considering the TC-20E III to use with my 70-200 f/2.8.<br />
Does anyone here use that combination?<br />
What is your experience with it?
</p></blockquote>
<p>there is whole thread on it some were</p>
<p>It is  "quite good" but you need to stop down to f 8</p>
<p>focusing is a tad slow </p>
<p>but its a lot lot cheaper  than the 200-400 f 4
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>aznick on "Nikon TC-17E III &amp; Nikon TC-14E III rumors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=6440#post-98540</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>aznick</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">98540@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I'm considering the TC-20E III to use with my 70-200 f/2.8.<br />
Does anyone here use that combination?<br />
What is your experience with it?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>sevencrossing on "Nikon TC-17E III &amp; Nikon TC-14E III rumors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=6440#post-98536</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>sevencrossing</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">98536@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>msmoto <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=6440#post-98530">said</a>:</cite><br />
.....an f/4 600mm is pricey and thus.....</p>
<p>Thanks, Adam
</p></blockquote>
<p>the N 400 2.8 is not exactly cheap
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>msmoto on "Nikon TC-17E III &amp; Nikon TC-14E III rumors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=6440#post-98530</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>msmoto</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">98530@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>adamz <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=6440#post-98523">said</a>:</cite><br />
msmoto - N400/2.8 + TC14 is 560mm f4 :)
</p></blockquote>
<p>Mmmmmm....yes, I guess you are correct.  I was switching back and forth and well....confusion....interestingly enough, the Exif data always shows it as 550mm for some reason.</p>
<p>So, allow me to restate this, in approximation.....an f/4 600mm is pricey and thus.....</p>
<p>Thanks, Adam
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>adamz on "Nikon TC-17E III &amp; Nikon TC-14E III rumors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=6440#post-98523</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>adamz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">98523@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>msmoto - N400/2.8 + TC14 is 560mm f4 :)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>msmoto on "Nikon TC-17E III &amp; Nikon TC-14E III rumors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=6440#post-98520</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>msmoto</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">98520@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Here is the TC-14E II on the 400mm f/2.8 VRII Nikkor, D4, at 1/800s f/13, ISO 800</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/fantinesfotos/7398198076/" title="ROAD AMERICA by Fantinesview, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8159/7398198076_4ae13f8c8c_z.jpg" alt="ROAD AMERICA" /></a></p>
<p>The 2000px size is here</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/fantinesfotos/7398198076/sizes/o/in/photostream/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/fantinesfotos/7398198076/sizes/o/in/photostream/</a></p>
<p>If one considers the price of an 800mm f/4.0 lens, the TC-14E II is a heck of a deal.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>adamz on "Nikon TC-17E III &amp; Nikon TC-14E III rumors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=6440#post-98519</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>adamz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">98519@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>there were some rumors around 1 year ago, but that's all. as sevencrossing wrote - 1.7II and 1.4II are really good TC's and there's really a small room for improvements in both of them
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>sevencrossing on "Nikon TC-17E III &amp; Nikon TC-14E III rumors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=6440#post-98504</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 05:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>sevencrossing</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">98504@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>The  x2 type II converter got very poor reviews </p>
<p>but this is not the case with x1.7 and the x1.4</p>
<p>both get quite good reviews </p>
<p>so we not see a new generation of these converters
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>E_ADLER on "Nikon TC-17E III &amp; Nikon TC-14E III rumors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=6440#post-98488</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 01:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>E_ADLER</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">98488@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Hi,<br />
I would like to buy the Nikon TC-17E II or the Nikon TC-14E II.<br />
Any rumors or info about the next generation in 1.4X and 1.7X category?<br />
Thanks :)<br />
E_ADLER
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
