<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: D800 AF problem</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=5600</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=5600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>msmoto on "D800 AF problem"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=5600#post-92228</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 17:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>msmoto</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">92228@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Hey, guys, this is on <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=5517&#038;page=5" rel="nofollow">http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=5517&#038;page=5</a>
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>round-table on "D800 AF problem"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=5600#post-92092</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 23:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>round-table</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">92092@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Looks like Nikon is now learning of this issue.  See this excellent technical 'white paper' about the problem at this webpage:  <a href="http://www.falklumo.com/lumolabs/articles/D800Focus/OuterSensors.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.falklumo.com/lumolabs/articles/D800Focus/OuterSensors.html</a><br />
Although the paper gets very technical, the last paragraph '4. Conclusion' best describes the potential extent of this issue.  In the 'breaking news' paragraph in paragraph 4, there is a link to a "Benkoop" post that has good photo examples of the problem before and after an adjustment by a Nikon technician.  I will now test my D800 for this issue.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>eqroger on "D800 AF problem"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=5600#post-88048</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>eqroger</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">88048@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>hello<br />
here is Korea and I am Korean.</p>
<p>I've checked five D800 bodies and it has same problem.<br />
left af point has problem</p>
<p>if you want see , use 85mm/f1.4/6m is best to check or 50mm/f1.4/3m is also good.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=newproduct_nikon&#038;no=46871" rel="nofollow">http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=newproduct_nikon&#038;no=46871</a></p>
<p>first picture, middle point shot(body adjustment 0)</p>
<p>second picture, left point shot(body adjustment 0)</p>
<p>arrow means depth!</p>
<p>Nikon Korea says it's not defective product and NO one-to-one exchange.<br />
And no official position yet.</p>
<p>check your body!
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
