<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: Need recommendations for a wide-angle on a DX sensor for panoramic interiors</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4753</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=4753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>heartyfisher on "Need recommendations for a wide-angle on a DX sensor for panoramic interiors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4753#post-76863</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 07:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>heartyfisher</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">76863@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>If you are using nodal ninja you dont really need a very wide angle lens at all. Its more important that the lens has as little distortion and CA as possible. I would suggest maybe a 20 or 24 mm prime would be a much better option. use it in portrait mode and grab your set of images then stitch them together. I used to do this for my 360deg real estate "virtual Tours" images.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>phaedarus on "Need recommendations for a wide-angle on a DX sensor for panoramic interiors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4753#post-76823</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>phaedarus</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">76823@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>dav34 <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4753#post-76788">said</a>:</cite><br />
10.5 fisheye. I use this combo with nodal ninja and the result are great. just a lot of CA to correct. All my photographic work here : *LINK REMOVED* are made with a D300 and a fisheye.</p>
<p>This my domain of predilecion, would be happy to answer other question you will have about panoramic photography.</p>
<p>David</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks for the responses.</p>
<p>David, how many shots do you usually bracket? The D7000 is only capable of 3 frames per session. Do you see this as sufficient for most interior situations?</p>
<p>Also, what do you think about the Rokinon 8mm? It's half the cost of the other brand of lenses. *LINK REMOVED*
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>tcole1983 on "Need recommendations for a wide-angle on a DX sensor for panoramic interiors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4753#post-76815</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tcole1983</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">76815@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Nikon 10-24?  Don't have to worry about the fisheye then and I think I would take it over the Sigma.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>sevencrossing on "Need recommendations for a wide-angle on a DX sensor for panoramic interiors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4753#post-76811</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>sevencrossing</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">76811@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>TheX-Man <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4753#post-76792">said</a>:</cite><br />
I think the sigma 10-20mm f4.5-f5.6, budget friendly &#38; good PQ.  (not sure how good it is with Panos though)
</p></blockquote>
<p>I used to use this lens for panos with a D90 I did the sticking  with elemets. it was fine. I cant  see  the point in using a fish eye as any corrextion will narrow the field of view
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>spraynpray on "Need recommendations for a wide-angle on a DX sensor for panoramic interiors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4753#post-76807</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>spraynpray</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">76807@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>+1
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>donaldejose on "Need recommendations for a wide-angle on a DX sensor for panoramic interiors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4753#post-76803</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>donaldejose</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">76803@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I use the Tokina 11-16 mm 2.8 AT-X lens for interiors with my D7000.  You might want to research it.  I think it is very good.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TheX-Man on "Need recommendations for a wide-angle on a DX sensor for panoramic interiors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4753#post-76792</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>TheX-Man</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">76792@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I think the sigma 10-20mm f4.5-f5.6, budget friendly &#38; good PQ.  (not sure how good it is with Panos though)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dav34 on "Need recommendations for a wide-angle on a DX sensor for panoramic interiors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4753#post-76788</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dav34</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">76788@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>10.5 fisheye. I use this combo with nodal ninja and the result are great. just a lot of CA to correct. All my photographic work here : *LINK REMOVED* are made with a D300 and a fisheye.</p>
<p>This my domain of predilecion, would be happy to answer other question you will have about panoramic photography.</p>
<p>David
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>phaedarus on "Need recommendations for a wide-angle on a DX sensor for panoramic interiors"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4753#post-76787</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>phaedarus</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">76787@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>The topic basically says it all.</p>
<p>I'm looking for a budget wide-angle lens that will enable me to do a decent job with shooting interior panoramic images using a D7000 and a Nodal Ninja.</p>
<p>The destined format will be the web, not print.</p>
<p>Any recommendations?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
