<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: I think the Pentax Q could have Ricoh thinking HP did it, should we</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4046</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 08:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=4046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "I think the Pentax Q could have Ricoh thinking HP did it, should we"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4046#post-67868</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">67868@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Too bad this isn't a Pentax forum. Please use the Nikon 1 discussion thread.</p>
<p><a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3889" rel="nofollow">http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3889</a><br />
<a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3713" rel="nofollow">http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3713</a>
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CaryTheLabelGuy on "I think the Pentax Q could have Ricoh thinking HP did it, should we"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4046#post-67846</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CaryTheLabelGuy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">67846@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>While Nikon 1 is also over-priced, it does offer more than the Q in the tech dept. Also, the 1 Nikkor glass looks pretty good. I imagine Nikon will re-evaluate the pricing structure after release.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bmxdad on "I think the Pentax Q could have Ricoh thinking HP did it, should we"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=4046#post-67844</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bmxdad</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">67844@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Honestly I was looking at the new $800 Pentax Q and who are they kidding, A toy camera for $800 sugg retail.  Just like the HP touchpad WAY overpriced, it's a toy camera and even have toy lenses</p>
<p>Anyway Ricoh do the HP thing and clear it out at maybe $200 - 300, lick your wounds and move on, just don't follow HP in giving up on everything, you can still sell a few DSLR's</p>
<p>Sadly the new Nikon offer does not look much better and also overpriced</p>
<p>BTW I bought a HP touchpad, it's not bad, but certainly no Ipad</p>
<p>Pete
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
