Thank you so much for the post. It's really useful.

[url=http://simulationpretpersonnel.com][color=#000000][u]pret personnel enligne[/u][/color][/url][color=#000000] - Pret personnel en ligne et de [/color]

Thank you so much for the post. It's really useful.

[url=http://simulationpretpersonnel.com][color=#000000][u]pret personnel enligne[/u][/color][/url][color=#000000] - Pret personnel en ligne et de [/color]

Thanks guys. I know this is a personal thing and that it is only relevant is you don't shoot raw. For the time being, I'm shooting jpg. I have enough learning how to use the camera!

seba - basically shoot raw and do the PP jobs after, unless You really wanna use only jpg, than You have to adjust the settings in body, as for my standard settings on d90, I use:
- image quality: raw+basic jpg
- image size - small (does affect only jpgs)
- color space: adobe
- d-lighting - auto
- b3 - set to 8mm
- a2 - wide
- b4 - w/o changes
- fps - set to high
- matrix metering - most of the times, or spot when the light varies too much across the frame
- af - for static af-s, for dynamic af-c or af-a
this settings works pretty well for all kind of animal pictures

Things like sharpness and saturation are subjective, not objective. It's a matter of personal preference for how YOU want YOUR photos to look. Some like B&W, some like flat neutral colors, some like me like the colors to pop out at you. The same is true with sharpness. Just go on our photo a day thread or any such place where various people post photos. If you see 100 photos you will see almost 100 different opinions about them being too saturated, saturated just right, over sharpened ect. ect.

Despite what anyone tells you, these things are up to the shooter and up to whomever is viewing what you do. In addition to this, when viewing on the web, the monitor the viewer is using will also depend on what they are seeing. If you have a standard flat panel monitor (say under $500), you not seeing true black as those TN and other cheaper monitors cannot display it. They come close but not quite. The more expensive flat panels (usually $600 and more), do a better job. Flat panels must also be calibrated properly. CRT's don't have these issues much.

Sorry got a little off topic but it goes to show that these things are very subjective.

Hi all!

I've seen some recommendations suggesting to increase the sharpness above the default and similar stuff with color saturation, etc. What is our experience? Thanks.