<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: Need Help with which lens I should invest in next. (Macro or Telephoto)</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3570</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=3570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>adamz on "Need Help with which lens I should invest in next. (Macro or Telephoto)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3570#post-61736</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 12:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>adamz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">61736@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>do a forum search
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>sevencrossing on "Need Help with which lens I should invest in next. (Macro or Telephoto)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3570#post-61733</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 11:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>sevencrossing</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">61733@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Welcome to the forum</p>
<p>for macro work ,you do not really need auto anything, so  for  value for money look at old second hand Nikkor Micro lens. I use a  30 year old 55mm f 2.8. The bees knees in Macro is the Nikon Micro-Nikkor 200 mm - F/4.0</p>
<p>for Wildlife the "trick" is to get close, rather than use a long lens, so do, at least, consider a hide, rather than a lens </p>
<p> A friend has a Sigma 150-500, his results are rubbish, but that may  be him ,rather than the lens</p>
<p>Most profession wild life photographs seem to use 300; 400 or 600 primes the two former often used with 1.5 or 1.7 teleconverters </p>
<p>I use a Nikon 70 -200 f 2.8 with a x 2 converter, not ideal, but I  already had the 70 -200 for portraiture</p>
<p>some / all of this has been discussed before, so beware of the terminator
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>elmo0823 on "Need Help with which lens I should invest in next. (Macro or Telephoto)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3570#post-61731</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 10:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>elmo0823</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">61731@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Hi I have just started into photography and love it. I have a D5000 with a 35mm DX, a 18-55 DX VR, and a 55-200 DX VR. I am looking into getting my next lens and wanted some opinions. I am looking into two options because I have found that I love macro photography and wildlife photography.</p>
<p>First the macro lens. I have been looking at the nikon 105 macro and the 85 dx macro. I was also told that the tamron 60mm is a great one. Which one do you suggest and why?</p>
<p>Second the wildlife. I have been able to get good photos of the wildlife I have found but I have found I don't have the reach that I need sometimes. I have read that the 150-500 sigma is a great lens for the price. If you have any other suggestions that would be great.</p>
<p>Thanks.
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
