<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: Anyone ever seen and F like this?</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3534</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=3534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>vidrazor on "Anyone ever seen and F like this?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3534#post-61460</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>vidrazor</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">61460@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Thanks for those links. They dispel that notion about them.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rusty on "Anyone ever seen and F like this?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3534#post-61435</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Rusty</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">61435@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>here is a link to the F serial numbers, they do not correspond with exact years.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.destoutz.ch/typ_production_data_f.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.destoutz.ch/typ_production_data_f.html</a></p>
<p>Here is a link to the F2 serial numbers.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.destoutz.ch/typ_production_data_f2.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.destoutz.ch/typ_production_data_f2.html</a></p>
<p>Rusty
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>vidrazor on "Anyone ever seen and F like this?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3534#post-61429</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>vidrazor</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">61429@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Thanks for the info. Yes, my body's serial is 7359508, so that coincides with Ade Barkah and Rusty's information. The APOLLO, eh? :-)</p>
<p>Someone once told the first two digits in the serial number pertained to the year the camera was made. Does anyone know if that's correct? If so this would be a 1973 body, and my 7856364 F2 would be a 1978 model.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the info.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rusty on "Anyone ever seen and F like this?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3534#post-61154</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Rusty</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">61154@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>These models with some of the F2 refinments were called The "APOLLO" Just the F range update coming to an end before the F2 took over production totally. Ran 1972-1974.</p>
<p>Rusty
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mike Gunter on "Anyone ever seen and F like this?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3534#post-61147</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 20:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Mike Gunter</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">61147@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Hi,</p>
<p>+1 confused.</p>
<p>Are you referring to the change in addition of the plastic coating of the rapid winding crank and self-timer? Perhaps Ade has the skinny on that. I do recall a racket when they were wound.</p>
<p>I bought/carried several cameras before/after those dates, but don't recall. Some were Nikkormats. </p>
<p>After 40 years, I wouldn't be surprised if some cameras were cannibalized to repair others, too.</p>
<p>My best,</p>
<p>Mike
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ade Barkah on "Anyone ever seen and F like this?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3534#post-61145</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ade Barkah</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">61145@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>@vidrazor:</p>
<p>Your levers are indicative of Nikon F bodies produced from mid-1972 onwards (serial number 735xxxx and above).
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>sevencrossing on "Anyone ever seen and F like this?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3534#post-61143</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>sevencrossing</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">61143@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Could it be an F that  been repaired with a F2 winder and self-timer lever
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>vidrazor on "Anyone ever seen and F like this?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3534#post-61141</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 15:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>vidrazor</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">61141@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>"...it's for people who want to shoot for a long time without being restricted by 24 or 36 frames."</p>
<p>Unless you were joking, the second picture was merely a reference. The top picture is what I was referring to.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NSXType-R on "Anyone ever seen and F like this?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3534#post-61140</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 15:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NSXType-R</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">61140@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I haven't seen one, but it's for people who want to shoot for a long time without being restricted by 24 or 36 frames.  I guess you could connect a motor drive on it too.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>heartyfisher on "Anyone ever seen and F like this?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3534#post-61134</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 03:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>heartyfisher</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">61134@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Huh ? what levers?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>vidrazor on "Anyone ever seen and F like this?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3534#post-61131</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 01:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>vidrazor</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">61131@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p><a href="http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i312/vidrazor/das-f.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i312/vidrazor/das-f.jpg</a></p>
<p>I bought this used F back around 1976, to replace my previous F that I had hosed. It had the winder and self-timer lever from the F2, unlike a typical F:<br />
<a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/Nikon_F_IMG_1947.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/Nikon_F_IMG_1947.jpg</a></p>
<p>I don't remember where I bought this, perhaps Olden Camera in Manhattan. Anyway I've always been curious why it had these levers. Anyone know? Thanks.
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
