<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: Camera Industry finalizing a 5 star rating for camera phone  quality</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3409</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=3409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>casperwb on "Camera Industry finalizing a 5 star rating for camera phone  quality"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3409#post-59211</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>casperwb</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">59211@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>we lost a star today, she got voted 8 stars,</p>
<p> however to comment on the phone stars, I think things other that the camera will sell the phone.</p>
<p>Smart phones are the go now, and I think those features will sell the phone, the camera is secondary.</p>
<p>hopefully I am wrong.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gelu88 on "Camera Industry finalizing a 5 star rating for camera phone  quality"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3409#post-59160</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 03:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gelu88</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">59160@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>NikoDoby <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3409#post-59130">said</a>:</cite><br />
Totally worthless ranking system. Do you really think a manufacturer would slap a 1 star label on their camera? Or would anything other then the most expensive model get 5 stars?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Good point, but i am assuming that since this is run by the "International Imaging Industry Association" and not one company, they will have a objective system, also in their example device they showed got 2.5 stars, which bodes well. I would assume a "1 star" cameraphone would be a 1.3Mp camera you find on a cheap flip phone, and i COULD imagine a manufacturer submitting such a phone for testing but who's saying they'd advertise the results? ;)</p>
<p>In addition they say they will certify DxO Labs or Imatest to do the testing, so while no holy grail, i am willing to assume some limited objective value to the score. </p>
<p>Obviously we'll see what happens when it actually comes out, if the iphone 4 gets anything over a 3.5, i'll be dissapointed.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JorPet on "Camera Industry finalizing a 5 star rating for camera phone  quality"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3409#post-59157</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JorPet</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">59157@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>With phones, people get really ticked off if they don't get what the manufacturer said they would get.  If a company says a camera is 5 star and it isn't, they will get creamed in the blogosphere and that has a real affect on phone sales.  Cell phones are very transient in nature.  Very few have life expectancies on store shelves of more than 6-9 months.  If they get a bad rap coming out of the gate there isn't time for that to fade before the whole model is replaced.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Regulator75 on "Camera Industry finalizing a 5 star rating for camera phone  quality"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3409#post-59136</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Regulator75</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">59136@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Intel has been using this Star rating for a while now, it could work...</p>
<p><a href="http://www.intel.com/consumer/products/processors/ratings.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.intel.com/consumer/products/processors/ratings.htm</a>
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Drab on "Camera Industry finalizing a 5 star rating for camera phone  quality"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3409#post-59135</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Drab</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">59135@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>NikoDoby <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3409#post-59130">said</a>:</cite><br />
Totally worthless ranking system. Do you really think a manufacturer would slap a 1 star label on their camera? Or would anything other then the most expensive model get 5 stars?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, they will use 1 stars.  But (as you kinda mention) it will tell the consumer nothing other than the price of the phone.  Cheap phones will get a "1 star camera".  Midrange phones will get a "3 star camera", etc.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "Camera Industry finalizing a 5 star rating for camera phone  quality"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3409#post-59130</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">59130@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Totally worthless ranking system. Do you really think a manufacturer would slap a 1 star label on their camera? Or would anything other then the most expensive model get 5 stars?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gelu88 on "Camera Industry finalizing a 5 star rating for camera phone  quality"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3409#post-59128</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gelu88</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">59128@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Depends on how they categorize it. If 5/5 rating is what a D3000 or mirrorless camera can produce, i doubt anyone will complain. Remember that this is primarily a cameraphone rating system.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TaoTeJared on "Camera Industry finalizing a 5 star rating for camera phone  quality"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3409#post-59127</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>TaoTeJared</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">59127@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Good idea.  It's better than nothing what everyone has now.  Scoring is all subjective and still will be manipulated by spin doctors but for the non-photo junkie, I'm guessing it is a welcome addition.  </p>
<p>The problem will all "star" system is that the quality always increases with time - 5 star today = 1 star tomorrow.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gelu88 on "Camera Industry finalizing a 5 star rating for camera phone  quality"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3409#post-59126</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gelu88</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">59126@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Very interesting idea, given the uselessness of megapixels and the difficulty of understanding the various factors that make a technically "good" camera, i'm curious to see how well this rating system works.</p>
<p>It's designed for cameraphones and compact cameras, so i would imagine that anything above a pro compact will score a 5/5.</p>
<p>"The test combines a host of technical measurements--detail, sharpness, chromatic aberration, lens distortion, and more--then links that analysis with subjective human assessments to ensure the measurements really are relevant. A detailed formula boils the various factors down into a single rating.</p>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-20046234-264.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-20046234-264.html</a>
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
