<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: Is RAW really non-destructive.</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3248</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=3248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "Is RAW really non-destructive."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3248#post-55869</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">55869@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Why bring up the old thread AND start a new discussion? Just add to the discussion that's already in progress. You don't have to start a new thread.<br />
<a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=23&#038;page=3#post-45083" rel="nofollow">http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=23&#038;page=3#post-45083</a>
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TaoTeJared on "Is RAW really non-destructive."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3248#post-55865</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>TaoTeJared</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">55865@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>There is no ability to change focus.  I think he must have been referring to using software to blur out areas?  Hell if I know.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Pierre on "Is RAW really non-destructive."</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=3248#post-55863</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">55863@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I tried to quote something from an old post but it did not worked so I open this thread.</p>
<p>I keep reading that RAW is not destructive but I wonder if this is true for all of the in-Camera settings (Active D-Lighting, noise reduction, color-balance, picture control (sharpening, contrast, brightness, saturation, hue, and vignette control)). There is not cost on committing to any of them?</p>
<p>In:</p>
<blockquote><p><cite>speye_21 <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=23&#38;page=3#post-45083">said</a>:</cite>…the whole point of RAW is you have the 'raw' information from the camera's sensor stored in a file - the closest thing you'll ever have to the real thing at the moment the image was recorded.  It's the equivalent of a camera negative, but better because you can use software to enhance or recover details whether it be color, luminance, focus, or other attributes.  RAW is non-destructive.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What is this thing about focus setting that can be reversed? Is this the lenses focus fine-tuning? Can you really bring back soft focus without resolving to phony sharpening tricks?
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
