<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: DPReview reviews Canon 60D, includes small noise comparison with D7000</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2820</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=2820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>jbl on "DPReview reviews Canon 60D, includes small noise comparison with D7000"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2820#post-48305</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 02:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jbl</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">48305@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Wow the pentax looks good!
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Vall on "DPReview reviews Canon 60D, includes small noise comparison with D7000"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2820#post-48271</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Vall</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">48271@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Actually, I prefer the rendering of Canon 60D while looking at the brush to the left (Martini bottle). However if I change the part to the tree on Bailey's bottle I strongly favor Nikon (all ISOs), while when looking at the queen card's face I prefer the 50D. There are also places that Pentax looks best to me. </p>
<p>I guess that means we can call them fairly even in that regard (considering the lens difference). :-)</p>
<p>Remember also that is'a a JPEG comparison by default. And Nikon lacks a bit of sharpening at deafults as I heard.. We'll see it all when they publish the D7k review.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>paeataa on "DPReview reviews Canon 60D, includes small noise comparison with D7000"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2820#post-48270</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>paeataa</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">48270@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>It seems to me that the 60D is doing a better job in this comparison.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Vall on "DPReview reviews Canon 60D, includes small noise comparison with D7000"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2820#post-48255</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Vall</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">48255@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>They added the Pentax K5 to the list :-)</p>
<p><a href="http://dpreview.com/news/1011/10111103comparedata.asp" rel="nofollow">http://dpreview.com/news/1011/10111103comparedata.asp</a>
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Digitalfiend on "DPReview reviews Canon 60D, includes small noise comparison with D7000"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2820#post-48141</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Digitalfiend</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">48141@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Sorry if this was already posted but I just noticed that DPReview has posted up their Canon 60D review.  Under the "Noise &#38; Noise Reduction" section, there is a small comparison table and one of the cameras is the D7000:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos60d/page11.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos60d/page11.asp</a></p>
<p>Just thought I'd share.
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
