<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: SB700 (Speculation)</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=28" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=3#post-49249</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 14:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">49249@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I think i'll rename this old thread and close it because its just three pages of speculation before the SB-700 was real.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>t-mitch4 on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=3#post-49246</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 13:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>t-mitch4</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">49246@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>That is great news Gareth.<br />
May I ask in what country you reside?</p>
<p>Tom
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Gareth on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=3#post-49231</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 07:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">49231@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Just opened my two.</p>
<p>they are tidy little units, much smaller than the 900.</p>
<p>seemed to af assist fine on all points on d300s and d700 up to 200mm at 300mm it didn't lock on consistently.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>broxibear on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=3#post-46966</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>broxibear</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">46966@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Hey t-mitch4<br />
In the UK the date I was given by a couple of retailers was Nov 17th ?<br />
There are a lot of SB-600's out there so I'm waiting to see what price impact the release of the SB-700 will have on the SB-600...at the moment it's £100 cheaper than the SB-700 pre-order price.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>t-mitch4 on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=3#post-46960</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>t-mitch4</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">46960@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Well, the SB-700 has been announced.<br />
Have any of you seen any reports or heard of a release date other than "Late November"?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Tom
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>shivaswrath on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=3#post-22359</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>shivaswrath</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22359@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>AND if you get 2 SB900's. . .you can probably accomplish the same thing with 2 SB700's? lol. . .</p>
<p>If you can set the SB700 up as a slave to a D200/300/700 body, usually meets most of the requirements. . .of filling up shadows and preventing the 'coon eye. . .
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PB PM on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=3#post-22358</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>PB PM</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22358@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Most likely because most women don't think logically. In any case, people who are not interested in photography have a hard time understanding why we would want to spend more than $300 on a camera, let alone a lens or flash unit.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jonnyapple on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=3#post-22356</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jonnyapple</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22356@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>warprints <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&#38;page=2#post-22083">said</a>:</cite><br />
Just would like to get 2 SB700s instead of one SB900 (anticipated price rounding error ignored).</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Spoken like a scientist. Why doesn't my wife understand statements like this?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ns1337 on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=3#post-22348</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ns1337</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22348@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>NSXType-R <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&#38;page=2#post-22068">said</a>:</cite><br />
I dunno, now that I got the 35mm 1.8, it doesn't really need a flash, but for the 18-135 I would love to have a bit of bounce flash.  I'm waiting for it to be announced too, I don't want to buy the SB600 just to have the SB700 or it's replacement be announced.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>NSX, I don't agree with that. I have a f/1.4 lens and while it allows fast shutter speeds, it doesn't get rid of those crappy shadows indoor. You need bounce no matter what the aperture is, unless you like people looking like raccoons.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>warprints on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=3#post-22083</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>warprints</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22083@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I'm really wanting the new UI, more than anything else - low end vs. high end.   Just would like to get 2 SB700s instead of one SB900 (anticipated price rounding error ignored).
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NSXType-R on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=3#post-22068</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 18:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NSXType-R</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22068@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I dunno, now that I got the 35mm 1.8, it doesn't really need a flash, but for the 18-135 I would love to have a bit of bounce flash.  I'm waiting for it to be announced too, I don't want to buy the SB600 just to have the SB700 or it's replacement be announced.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>soap on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=3#post-22009</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 12:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>soap</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22009@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>gd <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&#38;page=2#post-21994">said</a>:</cite><br />
I do find this thread mildly amusing as an example of "analysis paralysis" and "waiting for the next model".
</p></blockquote>
<p>Au contraire ;)<br />
I fear there is no reason to wait for the 700, that the replacement will possibly be more limited than the current, and would gobble up all the 600's I could find if I were in the market for the low-end of Nikon's CLS.  ;)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>warprints on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=3#post-22007</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 12:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>warprints</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22007@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>gd <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&#38;page=2#post-21994">said</a>:</cite><br />
I do find this thread mildly amusing as an example of "analysis paralysis" and "waiting for the next model". No doubt when the SB700 is eventually released, the wait for the SB800 will start ..........</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Au contraire.  (sp?)   If I have to wait much longer, I'll just by an SB900.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gd on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=3#post-21994</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 06:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gd</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">21994@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I do find this thread mildly amusing as an example of "analysis paralysis" and "waiting for the next model". No doubt when the SB700 is eventually released, the wait for the SB800 will start ..........</p>
<p>... oh wait a minute ... I have one of those already!
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=3#post-21857</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">21857@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>"any special message for all the kids watching at home?" </p>
<p>"Stay out of trouble."
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>soap on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=2#post-21854</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>soap</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">21854@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>/me believes it is more likely Nikon will surprise us with a full-featured SB-700 than that alphanikonrex is going to get the (important) cultural reference.<br />
  ;)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=2#post-21853</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">21853@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>"I'd buy that for a dollar!"
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>soap on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=2#post-21849</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>soap</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">21849@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Yes, large numbers get ridiculous quickly:</p>
<p><img src="http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/4397/car8.jpg" />
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>warprints on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=2#post-21842</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>warprints</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">21842@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>ND - actually, I'd be happy if its an SB600 with the SB900 style interface.   I'm easy to please.   I'd prefer SB800 capabilities with the SB900 UI, without the size and extra weight.   </p>
<p>Jonny - I hear ya, but personally I don't like it when they use really big numbers - starts to sound like something being sold on an infomercial.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jonnyapple on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=2#post-21838</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jonnyapple</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">21838@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>I know I'd be happier with the features of that new flash if they called it the SB-7000. That's like ten times better.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=2#post-21836</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">21836@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>And when it finally does come out you guys will complain it doesn't match your expectations :^)</p>
<p>Actually with the way Nikon has been kind of unpredictable with their recent naming conventions I'd guess the SB600 replacement won't be called 700.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>warprints on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=2#post-21835</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>warprints</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">21835@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>1337 - I've been waiting so long, I think I'll just pretend to start waiting all over again.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ns1337 on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=2#post-21800</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ns1337</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">21800@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>And I'm also waiting for the SB-700 to buy a flash. I'm glad it's not urgent seeing how people have been waiting for the past year or so.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=2#post-7778</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7778@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>You can type in all sorts of words and get sponsored hits. Just a way to drum up traffic. Search for "Nikon D800" or "Nikon D900" and the same thing happens. Doesn't mean anything I'm affraid. :(
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>D40_Owner on "SB700 (Speculation)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=28&amp;page=2#post-7763</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>D40_Owner</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7763@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Sponsored results for "Nikon SB-700" searches from B&#38;H show up on Google. Results for "SB-700" show up on all major search engines(although this may be for photo album refills). Try Searching for "SB-700" or "Nikon SB-400" from Google, Bing and Yahoo. </p>
<p>I am planning to purchase a SB-600 to replace/supplement my SB-400 sometime in the next few months and it would be great for a upgraded model to come out before then.
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
