<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: Canon&#039;s new 120 mp CMOS</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2456</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 07:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=2456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "Canon&#039;s new 120 mp CMOS"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2456#post-41584</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">41584@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>The same thing was said about lenses not being able to "resolve" higher than 12mp and that the megapixel "race" was over etc, etc.</p>
<p>This announcement is adding more fuel to the "canon is going to buy Pentax and develop a medium format camera" rumor.</p>
<p><a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2159" rel="nofollow">http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2159</a>
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Drab on "Canon&#039;s new 120 mp CMOS"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2456#post-41576</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Drab</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">41576@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>jonnyapple <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2456#post-41575">said</a>:</cite><br />
Where's the advantage if you're out-resolving your lenses?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Could just as easily ask "Where's the advantage if your lenses are better than your sensor?"</p>
<p>;)</p>
<p>But, to be serious, one will almost assuredly always be better than the other.  The greatest problem I see with super-density sensors is for landscape and macro shooters.  Anyone who routinely tightens their aperture will start trading in resolution for depth-of-field more quickly as the diffraction point creeps lower and lower.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jonnyapple on "Canon&#039;s new 120 mp CMOS"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2456#post-41575</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jonnyapple</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">41575@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Where's the advantage if you're out-resolving your lenses?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>monty11 on "Canon&#039;s new 120 mp CMOS"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2456#post-41567</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 05:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>monty11</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">41567@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Now this is interesting: <a href="http://www.photographyblog.com/news/120_megapixel_canon_cmos_sensor/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+photographyblog+PhotographyBLOG" rel="nofollow">http://www.photographyblog.com/news/120_megapixel_canon_cmos_sensor/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+photographyblog+PhotographyBLOG</a>
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
