<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: &#039;wonder camera&#039; (currently sci-fi, don&#039;t worry!)</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2303</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=2303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>kyoshinikon on "&#039;wonder camera&#039; (currently sci-fi, don&#039;t worry!)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2303#post-38819</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 13:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kyoshinikon</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">38819@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>The scariest part is that Canon is the one behind this :)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PB PM on "&#039;wonder camera&#039; (currently sci-fi, don&#039;t worry!)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2303#post-38668</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 04:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>PB PM</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">38668@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>People most likely thought we would be crazy saying we can get clean ISO1600 shots, let alone ISO 102400!
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ShadeofBlue on "&#039;wonder camera&#039; (currently sci-fi, don&#039;t worry!)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2303#post-38662</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 01:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ShadeofBlue</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">38662@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Things like this make me wonder how outlandish ISO 102400 would have sounded 20 years ago.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Pierre on "&#039;wonder camera&#039; (currently sci-fi, don&#039;t worry!)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2303#post-38656</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 22:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">38656@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>What is it we would need to worry about if the 'wonder camera' was not currently sci-fi?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kyoshinikon on "&#039;wonder camera&#039; (currently sci-fi, don&#039;t worry!)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2303#post-38632</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kyoshinikon</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">38632@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><blockquote><p><cite>LensWork <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2303#post-38562">said</a>:</cite><br />
That new Canon bears a very striking resemblance (shape &#38; style wise) to a point-n-shoot film camera Canon had about 25 years ago <a href="http://www.collection-appareils.fr/canon/images/canon_autoboy.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.collection-appareils.fr/canon/images/canon_autoboy.jpg</a>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It actually reminds me of the nikon pronea in appearance with a little canon rebel and apple (no buttons!) tossed in.  I doubt it can do f/1.4 throughout that range...</p>
<p>The concept doesn't seem too far off actually considering the superzooms we have now (who would of imagined Sigmas 50-500mm auto 20 years ago and that is in the interchangeable lens department, the FinePix HS10 has the equivalent to 24-720mm and Nikons P100 isn't far behind). Also optical zoom is becoming quite common in most lower end cameras, making glass elements obsolete...</p>
<p>Also the gigapixel trend, the "framerates" that DSLR's are adopting, and the rising mpx can account to the idea being taken seriously in a decade or two... A hasselblad with a phase 5 65mpx back is often claimed to not need any lens longer than an 80mm because you can just crop and crop and crop. I could believe that they will have 200-300mpx 35mmish or smaller sensors in 30ish years If newer technology doesn't change the way cameras capture images again, and with the rise of optical zoom could make a camera like this possible...
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Adam on "&#039;wonder camera&#039; (currently sci-fi, don&#039;t worry!)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2303#post-38575</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 20:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">38575@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Why does this look familiar??? hmm toilet brush holder and mirror???
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Anonymous on "&#039;wonder camera&#039; (currently sci-fi, don&#039;t worry!)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2303#post-38562</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 18:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">38562@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>That new Canon bears a very striking resemblance (shape &#38; style wise) to a point-n-shoot film camera Canon had about 25 years ago <a href="http://www.collection-appareils.fr/canon/images/canon_autoboy.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.collection-appareils.fr/canon/images/canon_autoboy.jpg</a> .
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kauyeung on "&#039;wonder camera&#039; (currently sci-fi, don&#039;t worry!)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2303#post-38561</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 18:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kauyeung</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">38561@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Yes.  I probably need one of those in twenty years for I won't be able to handle anything above 100mm.  They just too heavy by then.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Geoff on "&#039;wonder camera&#039; (currently sci-fi, don&#039;t worry!)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2303#post-38556</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">38556@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Oops - sorry, wrong forum.  If someone could move to the appropriate forum (weird/fun?), that would be cool :)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Geoff on "&#039;wonder camera&#039; (currently sci-fi, don&#039;t worry!)"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2303#post-38554</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">38554@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Check this out:<br />
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/canon-wonder-camera-concept-promises-single-lens-perfection-vid/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/canon-wonder-camera-concept-promises-single-lens-perfection-vid/</a></p>
<p>No specs or anything like that, just a bit of fantasy from Canon really.  I'm not suggesting it's necessarily a good idea.  I just found it an interesting concept and I like gadgets and crap like that, so I thought I'd share it with you guys :)</p>
<p>The video also features a Panasonic 'life wall', which I don't need at all, but feel like I do, if just for potential coolness factor.  A bit like the iPhone 4 then, which I still don't own ....(yet?) :)
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
