<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nikon Rumors Forum &#187; Topic: Several Fuji Films Discontinued?</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2183</link>
		<description>where there’s smoke there’s forum fire</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 11:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/forum/rss.php?topic=2183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>NSXType-R on "Several Fuji Films Discontinued?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2183#post-36552</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NSXType-R</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">36552@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>No!</p>
<p>Don't discontinue them yet, I haven't even yet gained enough experience to be using high end film!
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "Several Fuji Films Discontinued?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2183#post-36538</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">36538@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Hmm, then why bother with a name change if it's the same film? Just leads to confusion doesnt it? It's been a while since i've kept up with all the name changes with all the various films. I can understand if its a new formula or something but not if its just repackaging
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ChrisLange on "Several Fuji Films Discontinued?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2183#post-36480</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 23:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ChrisLange</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">36480@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>as far as I know, 160s will become 160ns, and 160c will become 160nc</p>
<p>these have been the names of these films in japan for a while now, so I'd imagine they're just bringing the rest of the world up to speed.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "Several Fuji Films Discontinued?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2183#post-36458</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">36458@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>It seems like enough people complained about them getting rid of 800z that Fuji did change their minds and are not getting rid of it after all :^) Their 160 films are going to now become 160ns. Supposedly it's the same film so I don't understand how 160s and c can be "combined" into one film? </p>
<p>Fuji also said they are not going to kill any of their instant films. YES!
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kanuck on "Several Fuji Films Discontinued?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2183#post-36456</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kanuck</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">36456@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>Thank god! Love that Provia and Velvia!
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NikoDoby on "Several Fuji Films Discontinued?"</title>
			<link>http://nikonrumors.com/forum/topic.php?id=2183#post-36449</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">36449@http://nikonrumors.com/forum/</guid>
			<description><p>OK so this came up in another thread and I wanted to know if anyone else has heard any confirmation on which films are really dying and which are just being repackaged? Any of you retail guys confirm these film deaths? I know the rumors have been floating around for a few months now. According to film boy Chris Lange they are just repackaging from single to multi-rolls?</p>
<p>Fuji made an announcement that 800Z was dead last year but apparently changed their minds(?) to keep it but now they are apparently killing it? The T64 and 160s and c are going to be killed off this year too. I've heard about a new 160 but don't know what to believe now. Any of you that work in camera stores confirm this list please</p>
<p>Discountinued</p>
<p>Velvia 50 4×5 quickload<br />
Velvia 100 4×5 quickload<br />
Velvia 100F 4×5 quickload<br />
Provia 100F 4×5 quickload<br />
Color 160s and 160c: 35, 120, 220, 4×5, 8×10, and 4×5 quickload<br />
Color 800z: 35mm 5pack, 120 and 220<br />
T64 in all formats<br />
Neopan 400 in 120</p>
<p>Not gone only new packaging:</p>
<p>Provia 100F 4×5 and 8×10 now in 20 sheet boxes<br />
Provia 100F 120 now in 5-packs<br />
Arcos 100 120 now in 5-packs<br />
Arcos 100 4×5 now in 20 sheet boxes.<br />
Velvia 50, 100, 100F 4×5 and 8×10 now in 20 sheet boxes<br />
Velvia 50, 100, 100F now in 5-packs
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
